CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 123Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychiatric care and mental health services

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A real‐world study of the effectiveness of DBT in the UK National Health Service

Feigenbaum, Janet D., Fonagy, Peter, Pilling, Stephen, Jones, Alan, Wildgoose, Amanda, Bebbington, Paul E.·2012·British Journal of Clinical Psychology
DOI 10.1111/j.2044-8260.2011.02017.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives. Dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) has gained widespread popularity as a treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD), and its efficacy has been demonstrated in several trials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of DBT delivered by staff with a level of training readily achievable in National Health Service care settings for individuals with a Cluster B personality disorder. Design. Randomized control trial methodology was used to compare DBT to treatment as usual (TAU). Method. Forty‐two participants entered the trial. Diagnostic and outcome measures were undertaken at assessment, at 6 months, and at 1 year. The clinical outcomes in routine evaluation – outcome measure (CORE‐OM) were utilized as the primary outcome measure. Results. Both the DBT and TAU groups improved on the range of measures employed. The DBT group showed a slightly greater decrease in CORE‐OM risk scores, suicidality, and post‐traumatic stress disorder symptom severity. However, the TAU group showed comparable reductions in all measures and a larger decrease in para‐suicidal behaviours and risk. Conclusions. DBT may be an effective treatment delivered by community outpatient services for individuals with a Cluster B personality disorder. Further studies are needed to consider the impact of experience and adherence to DBT in improving outcome.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-8260.2011.02017.x

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 61 references

3 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Beck A. T., 1996, Manual for the beck depression inventory‐II
  2. First M. B., 1998, Structured clinical interview for DSM‐IV Axis I disorders – Patient edition (SCID‐I
  3. Linehan M. M., 1987, Treatment history inventory (THI)
  4. Moran P., 2005, Meeting the health social care and wellbeing needs of individuals with a personality disorder
  5. NICE, 2009, Borderline personality disorder: Treatment and management
  6. Singleton N., 1998, Study on psychiatric morbidity among prisoners

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–123 of 123

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Feigenbaum, J. D., Fonagy, P., Pilling, S., Jones, A., Wildgoose, A., & Bebbington, P. E.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Feigenbaum, Janet D.
ORCID
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-05-20
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
121-141
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
DOI
10.1111/j.2044-8260.2011.02017.x
OpenAlex
W1873376911
Cited by
123
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0510-10228)
  • Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
dialectical behavior therapy, borderline personality disorder, cluster B personality disorders, treatment effectiveness, suicidality, post-traumatic stress disorder, risk score, usual care, National Health Service
MeSH terms
Adult, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Behavior Therapy, Borderline Personality Disorder, Community Health Services, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Personality Disorders, State Medicine, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review