Cited by 1,416Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Effectiveness of partial hospitalization in the treatment of borderline personality disorder: a randomized controlled trial

Bateman, Anthony, Fonagy, Peter·1999·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the effectiveness of psychoanalytically oriented partial hospitalization with standard psychiatric care for patients with borderline personality disorder. METHOD: Thirty-eight patients with borderline personality disorder, diagnosed according to standardized criteria, were allocated either to a partially hospitalized group or to a standard psychiatric care (control) group in a randomized controlled design. Treatment, which included individual and group psychoanalytic psychotherapy, was for a maximum of 18 months. Outcome measures included the frequency of suicide attempts and acts of self-harm, the number and duration of inpatient admissions, the use of psychotropic medication, and self-report measures of depression, anxiety, general symptom distress, interpersonal function, and social adjustment. Data analysis used repeated measures analysis of covariance and nonparametric tests of trend. RESULTS: Patients who were partially hospitalized showed a statistically significant decrease on all measures in contrast to the control group, which showed limited change or deterioration over the same period. An improvement in depressive symptoms, a decrease in suicidal and self-mutilatory acts, reduced inpatient days, and better social and interpersonal function began at 6 months and continued until the end of treatment at 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: Psychoanalytically oriented partial hospitalization is superior to standard psychiatric care for patients with borderline personality disorder. Replication is needed with larger groups, but these results suggest that partial hospitalization may offer an alternative to inpatient treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.156.10.1563

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bateman 1999 found a very large, statistically significant difference in favour of MBT-PH for depression (SMD -1.98; N = 38, 95% CI -2.78 to -1.19; Analysis 1.14).

    “Bateman 1999 report data indicating a very large, statistically significant difference in favour of MBT-PH (SMD -1.98; N = 38, 95% CI -2.78 to -1.19; Analysis 1.14).”

    From Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. (2012) · cites this paper as Bateman 1999

  • Two trials (Bateman 1999; Zanarini 2008) did not mention blinding of outcome assessors, and their risk of bias was judged unclear.

    “Two trials did not mention blinding of outcome assessors (Bateman 1999;Zanarini 2008), and the risk of bias was judged 'unclear'.”

    From Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. (2012) · cites this paper as Bateman 1999

  • MBT has been compared with control groups in two trials, one testing MBT in a partial hospitalisation (MBT-PH; Bateman 1999) and one testing MBT in an outpatient setting (MBT-out; Bateman 2009).

    “It has been compared with control groups in two trials, one testing MBT in a partial hospitalisation (MBT-PH; Bateman 1999) and one testing MBT in an outpatient setting (MBT-out; Bateman 2009).”

    From Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. (2012) · cites this paper as Bateman 1999

  • Bateman 1999 reported a very large, significant effect of less interpersonal pathology in partially-hospitalised MBT patients (SMD -2.22; N = 38, 95% CI -3.04 to -1.39; Analysis 1.10).

    “Bateman 1999 report data indicating a very large, significant effect of less interpersonal pathology in partially-hospitalised MBT patients (SMD -2.22; N = 38, 95% CI -3.04 to -1.39; Analysis 1.10).”

    From Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. (2012) · cites this paper as Bateman 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P.
Affiliations
St Ann's Hospital (GB)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1999-10-01
Volume
156
Issue
10
Pages
1563-1569
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2119720111
Cited by
1,416
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 74
FWCI
38.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, partial hospitalization, psychoanalytic psychotherapy, group therapy, suicide attempts, self-harm, hospitalization, psychotropic drug use, depressive symptoms, social adaptation, interpersonal functioning
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Borderline Personality Disorder, Day Care, Medical, Depressive Disorder, Female, Health Status, Hospitalization, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Length of Stay, London, Male, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychoanalytic Therapy, Psychotherapy, Group, Psychotropic Drugs, Self Mutilation, Social Adjustment, Suicide, Attempted, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review