Cited by 50Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Can trainees effectively deliver dialectical behavior therapy for individuals with borderline personality disorder? Outcomes from a training clinic

Rizvi, Shireen L., Hughes, Christopher D., Hittman, Alexandra D., Vieira Oliveira, Pedro·2017·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a 6-month course of comprehensive dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) provided in a training clinic with doctoral students as therapists and assessors. METHOD: = 29.52 [SD = 9.64]) are reported. Reliable change indices and clinical significance were calculated for measures. Finally, our results were benchmarked against a "gold standard" randomized clinical trial (RCT; McMain et al., 2009). RESULTS: Analyses with both the full sample and the treatment completers indicate significant reductions in mental health symptomatology that were reliable, clinically and statistically significant, and comparable in effect size to the benchmarked RCT. CONCLUSION: This DBT training clinic produced good outcomes, comparable to that of a large RCT. Results have implications for who can provide DBT treatment, as well as improving access to DBT in community settings where training clinics may be located.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.22467

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study at the Dialectical Behavior Therapy Clinic at Rutgers University, therapist trainees delivering DBT achieved similar outcomes to a benchmarked gold-standard RCT.

    “Indeed, in a study conducted at the Dialectical Behavior Therapy Clinic at Rutgers University (DBT-RU), it was found that therapist trainees delivering DBT could achieve similar outcomes to a benchmarked gold-standard RCT (58).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rizvi, S. L., Hughes, C. D., Hittman, A. D., & Vieira Oliveira, P.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Rutgers University
Corresponding author
Rizvi, Shireen L.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-21
Volume
73
Issue
12
Pages
1599-1611
ISSN
  • 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4679
OpenAlex
W2589693427
Cited by
50
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
FWCI
5.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (SRG‐0‐126‐11)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
dialectical behavior therapy, borderline personality disorder, trainee therapists, doctoral students, treatment effectiveness, reliable change index, clinical significance, access to psychotherapy, community mental health services
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adult, Behavior Therapy, Borderline Personality Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Benchmarking, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review