Cited by 54Cancer survivorship and careWomen's cancer prevention and managementCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From Despair to Hope: A Longitudinal Study of Illness Perceptions and Coping in a Psycho-Educational Group Intervention for Women with Breast Cancer

Abstract

Objectives This study examined the cross‐sectional and longitudinal relationships of illness perceptions, coping, and distress in women with breast cancer. Illness perceptions and coping at baseline and changes in these variables over time served as possible predictors of distress at two follow‐up points. Design and methods Fifty‐seven women with breast cancer who participated in a psychosocial aftercare programme completed a questionnaire before the start of the intervention, directly after the end of the intervention, and 1 year after the start of the intervention. Study variables were assessed with the Illness Perception Questionnaire‐Revised (illness perceptions), the COPE (coping), and the Hopkins Symptom Check List (distress). Results Results showed that 43% of variance in distress at baseline was explained by participants' illness perceptions. Cyclical timeline perceptions were the strongest predictor of distress at baseline. Longitudinal data revealed that after the end of the intervention, the intensity of general distress and breast cancer‐related emotions had decreased significantly. Partial correlations showed that baseline illness perceptions were unrelated to distress at follow‐up. However, changes in illness perceptions (perceptions about the cyclical and chronic timeline and symptoms associated with breast cancer) showed significant associations with distress at both follow‐up assessments. Associations of follow‐up distress with coping styles were less consistent. Conclusions Our results suggest that changes in illness perceptions are related to an improvement or worsening of patients' emotional well‐being over time. These findings hold promise for the development of interventions that specifically target patients' representations of their illness. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Research has shown that 15%–30% of breast cancer survivors continue to experience elevated distress following treatment. Illness perceptions and coping have been found to contribute to distress in women with breast cancer. What does this study add? Cyclical timeline beliefs affect distress in breast cancer both in cross‐sectional and longitudinal analyses. Baseline illness perceptions are less predictive of distress at follow‐up than changes in illness perceptions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02100.x

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1037/0022‐3514.53.2.273 · DOI
  2. Kleijn W. C., 2000, Ervaringen met een Nederlandse bewerking van de COPE vragenlijst [Experiences with a Dutch version of the COPE questionnaire], Gedrag en Gezondheid, 28, 213

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fischer, M. J., Wiesenhaan, M. E., Heijer, A. D., Kleijn, W. C., Nortier, J. W. R., & Kaptein, A. A.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Department of Surgery Diaconessenhuis Leiden The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Fischer, Maarten J.
Venue
British Journal of Health Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-09-24
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
526-545
ISSN
  • 1359-107X (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8287
OpenAlex
W2122916661
Cited by
54
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
breast cancer, illness perception, coping, psychological distress, breast cancer survivors, emotional well-being
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aftercare, Analysis of Variance, Attitude to Health, Breast Neoplasms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Emotions, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Help Groups, Stress, Psychological, Program Evaluation, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review