Cited by 62Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentChaos, Complexity, and EducationDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Detecting and modelling developmental transitions

Hartelman, Pascal A. I., van der Maas, Han L. J., Molenaar, Peter C. M.·1998·British Journal of Developmental Psychology

Abstract

Catastrophe theory can be very useful in research concerning developmental transitions. It provides a number of canonical transition models as well as criteria which can be used for the detection of transitions in experimental research. In this contribution the relevance of using catastrophe theory in cognitive developmental research is discussed. In particular, emphasis is placed on the detection criteria and their operationalizations in conservation research, as well as to fitting techniques for canonical transition models with respect to their applicability and robustness., 19 October 1995, 8 August 1997

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-835x.1998.tb00751.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Structural analyses and dynamic growth modeling enable the precise examination of source(s) of variation within nonlinear systems of hierarchical complexity, particularly when such methods address intersectionality and do not generalize findings to all human beings or all members of a group.

    “structural analyses and dynamic growth modeling enable the precise examination of source(s) of variation within nonlinear systems of hierarchical complexity, particularly when such methods address intersectionality (Fischer & Kennedy, 1997;Hartelman, van der Maas, & Molenaar, 1998;Singer & Willett, 2003;van Geert, 1991van Geert, , 2003) ) and do not generalize findings to all human beings or all”

    From Malleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context1 (2019) · cites this paper as Hartelman, van der Maas, & Molenaar, 1998

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hartelman, P. A. I., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Molenaar, P. C. M.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Hartelman, Pascal A. I.
Venue
British Journal of Developmental Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-03
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
97-122
ISSN
  • 0261-510X (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-835X
OpenAlex
W2121946382
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Journal of Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Chaos, Complexity, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
catastrophe theory, developmental transitions, conservation research, cognitive development, model fitting, robustness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review