Cited by 1,487Advanced Bandit Algorithms ResearchOptimization and Search ProblemsSimulation Techniques and Applications

Bandit processes and dynamic allocation indices

Gittins, J. C.·1979·Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology

Abstract

Summary The paper aims to give a unified account of the central concepts in recent work on bandit processes and dynamic allocation indices; to show how these reduce some previously intractable problems to the problem of calculating such indices; and to describe how these calculations may be carried out. Applications to stochastic scheduling, sequential clinical trials and a class of search problems are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1979.tb01068.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Finding an analytical solution to the Bayes-optimal policy in MDPs is extremely challenging and only possible for a few special cases.

    “Finding an analytical solution to Equation 9 is extremely challenging and indeed only possible for a few special cases (Duff, 2003; Gittins, 1979), which made it historically near impossible to investigate such problems within the framework of rational analysis.”

    From Meta-learned models of cognition (2024) · cites this paper as Gittins, 1979

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gittins, J. C.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Gittins, J. C.
Venue
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
Published
1979-01-01
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
148-164
ISSN
  • 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9868
OpenAlex
W3125634603
Cited by
1,487
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 46
FWCI
14.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Sussex
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Optimization and Search Problems
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
Keywords
sequential allocation, stochastic scheduling, sequential clinical trials, search problems, sequential decision making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review