Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 357

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biosurfactant production: emerging trends and promising strategies

Singh, P., Patil, Y., Rale, V.·2019·Journal of Applied Microbiology
DOI 10.1111/jam.14057
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Biosurfactants are economically most sought after biotechnological compounds of the 21st century. However, inefficient bioprocessing has mitigated the economical commercial production of these compounds. Although much work is being done on the use of low-cost substrates for their production, a paucity of literature exists on the upcoming bioprocess optimization strategies and their successes and potential for economical biosurfactant production. This review discusses some of the latest developments and most promising strategies to enhance and economize the biosurfactant production process. Recent market analysis, developments in the field of optimally formulated cost credit substrates for enhanced product formation and subsequent process economization are few of the critical aspects highlighted here. Use of nanoparticles and coproduction of biosurfactant along with other commercially important compounds like enzymes, are other upcoming bioprocess intensification strategies. The recent developments discussed here would not only give an overview of pertinent parameters for economic biosurfactant production but would also bring to fore multiple strategies that would open up new avenues of research on biosurfactant production. This would go a long way in making biosurfactants a commercially successful compound of the current century.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jam.14057

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Amin, 2013, A Two-stage immobilized cell bioreactor with Bacillus subtilis and Rhodococcus erythropolis for the simultaneous production of biosurfactant and biodesulfurization of model oil, Petro Sci Technol, 31, 2250, 10.1080/10916466.2011.565292 · doi:10.1080/10916466.2011.565292
  2. Colla, 2016, Surface response methodology for the optimization of lipase production under submerged fermentation by filamentous fungi, Brazilian J Microbiol, 47, 461, 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.01.028 · doi:10.1016/j.bjm.2016.01.028
  3. Ji, 2016, Production of rhamnolipids with a high specificity by Pseudomonas aeruginosa M408 isolated from petroleum-contaminated soil using olive oil as sole carbon source, Ann Microbiol, 66, 1145, 10.1007/s13213-016-1203-9 · doi:10.1007/s13213-016-1203-9
  4. Kalyani, 2014, Production optimization of Rhamnolipid biosurfactant by Streptomyces coelicoflavus (NBRC 15399T) using Plackett-Burman design, Eur J Biotechnol Biosci, 1, 07
  5. Lins, 2016, Microbes in the Spotlight: Recent Progress in the Understanding of Beneficial and Harmful Microorganisms, 339
  6. Liu, 2013, Effects of Fe nanoparticles on bacterial growth and biosurfactant production, J Nanopart Res, 15, 1
  7. Luo, 2013a, Optimization of medium composition for lipopeptide production from Bacillus subtilis N7 using Response Surface Methodology, Microbiol Biotechnol Lett, 41, 52, 10.4014/kjmb.1207.07020 · doi:10.4014/kjmb.1207.07020
  8. Magalhães, 2018, Use of different agroindustrial waste and produced water for biosurfactant production, Biosci, Biotechnol Res Asia, 15, 17, 10.13005/bbra/2604 · doi:10.13005/bbra/2604
  9. Mahanti, 2017, Microbial Biotechnology, 413, 10.1007/978-981-10-6847-8_18 · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-6847-8_18
  10. Oliveira, 2015, Review: sophorolipids a promising biosurfactant and its applications, Int J Adv Biotechnol Res, 6, 161
  11. Onwosi, 2013, Rhamnolipid biosurfactant production by Pseudomonas nitroreducens immobilized on Ca2+ alginate beads and under resting cell condition, Annals Microbiol, 63, 161, 10.1007/s13213-012-0456-1 · doi:10.1007/s13213-012-0456-1
  12. Patil, 2015, Handbook on Climate Change Adaptation, 2079, 10.1007/978-3-642-38670-1_49 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38670-1_49
  13. Patil, 2016, Primary Screening of actinomycetes in prospects with biosurfactant production from animal fat waste, Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci, 5, 92, 10.20546/ijcmas.2016.502.010 · doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2016.502.010
  14. Pinto, 2018, Production in bioreactor, toxicity and stability of a low-cost biosurfactant, Chem Eng, 64, 595
  15. Raheb, 2011, The stable rhamnolipid biosurfactant production in genetically engineered Pseudomonas strain reduced energy consumption in biodesulfurization, Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery Util Environ Eff, 33, 2113, 10.1080/15567030903503167 · doi:10.1080/15567030903503167
  16. Raza, 2016, Response surface optimization in biosurfactant production by using a renewable growth substrate, Indian J Biotechnol, 15, 217
  17. Sahebnazar, 2018, Enhancement of Pseudomonas aeruginosa growth and rhamnolipid production using iron-silica nanoparticles in low-cost medium, J Nanostructures, 8, 1
  18. Sahoo, 2011, Optimization of culture conditions for biosurfactant production from Pseudomonas aeruginosa OCD1, J Adv Sci Res, 2, 32
  19. Santos, 2016b, Strategy for waste management in the production and application of biosurfactant through surface response methodology, Clean Technol Environ Policy, 18, 787, 10.1007/s10098-015-1052-4 · doi:10.1007/s10098-015-1052-4
  20. Sivapathasekaran, 2017, Origin, properties, production and purification of microbial surfactants as molecules with immense commercial potential, Tenside Surfact Det, 54, 92

Cited by

See all 357

Metadata

Authors
Singh, P., Patil, Y., & Rale, V.
Venue
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2018-08-26
Volume
126
Issue
1
Pages
2-13
ISSN
1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1111/jam.14057
OpenAlex
W2887929448
Cited by
357
References
76
FWCI
9.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.