Cited by 83Nursing Roles and PracticesGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesInterprofessional Education and Collaboration

Effects of substituting nurse practitioners, physician assistants or nurses for physicians concerning healthcare for the ageing population: a systematic literature review

Lovink, Marleen H., Persoon, Anke, Koopmans, Raymond T.C.M., Van Vught, Anneke J.A.H., Schoonhoven, Lisette, Laurant, Miranda G.H.·2017·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the effects of substituting nurse practitioners, physician assistants or nurses for physicians in long‐term care facilities and primary healthcare for the ageing population (primary aim) and to describe what influences the implementation (secondary aim). Background: Healthcare for the ageing population is undergoing major changes and physicians face heavy workloads. A solution to guarantee quality and contain costs might be to substitute nurse practitioners, physician assistants or nurses for physicians. Design: A systematic literature review. Data sources: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Psyc INFO, CENTRAL, Web of Science; searched January 1995–August 2015. Review methods: Study selection, data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted independently by two reviewers. Outcomes collected: patient outcomes, care provider outcomes, process of care outcomes, resource use outcomes, costs and descriptions of the implementation. Data synthesis consisted of a narrative summary. Results: Two studies used a randomized design and eight studies used other comparative designs. The evidence of the two randomized controlled trials showed no effect on approximately half of the outcomes and a positive effect on the other half of the outcomes. Results of eight other comparative study designs point towards the same direction. The implementation was influenced by factors on a social, organizational and individual level. Conclusion: Physician substitution in healthcare for the ageing population may achieve at least as good patient outcomes and process of care outcomes compared with care provided by physicians. Evidence about resource use and costs is too limited to draw conclusions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jan.13299

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased involvement of non-physicians such as Registered Nurses and Nurse Practitioners has long been recognized as an effective way to enhance access to primary care services.

    “Increased involvement of non-physicians such as Registered Nurses (RNs) and Nurse Practitioners (NPs) has long been recognized as an effective way to enhance access to primary care services.6-12”
  • Many studies with strong research designs have shown nursing-intensive primary care models to be safe and effective.

    “Many studies with strong research designs have shown nursing-intensive primary care models to be safe and effective.8,11,18-26”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lovink, M. H., Persoon, A., Koopmans, R. T. C. M., Van Vught, A. J. A. H., Schoonhoven, L., & Laurant, M. G. H.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • HAN University of Applied Sciences Nijmegen The Netherlands
  • HAN University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Corresponding author
Lovink, Marleen H.
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05-02
Volume
73
Issue
9
Pages
2084-2102
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2597348242
Cited by
83
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport of the Netherlands (321580)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Keywords
nurse practitioners, physician assistants, population aging, long-term care, primary care, implementation factors, patient outcomes, process of care, resource utilization (health care), health care costs, physician workload
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Geriatric Nursing, Humans, Long-Term Care, Male, Middle Aged, Nurse Practitioners, Physician Assistants, Primary Health Care, Quality of Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review