Cited by 53Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchInclusion and Disability in Education and SportPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Contact with Primary Care: The Experience of People with Intellectual Disabilities

Perry, Jonathan, Felce, David, Kerr, Mike, Bartley, Stuart, Tomlinson, Judith, Felce, Janet·2014·Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

Abstract

Background: People with intellectual disabilities experi‐ence disparities in their health and health care. Annual health checks are intended to counter such disparity by improving access to primary health care. However, little is known about their experience of having a health check or other types of contact with primary care services. Materials and Methods: The findings of two studies which used focus groups were combined. 102 people with intellectual disabilities participated in the focus groups. Results: Participants' experiences of primary care services generally, and health checks in particular, were positive. However, unanimity was rare on any of the topics discussed and a number of areas of dissatisfaction emerged. Conclusions: Further studies with larger and more representative samples are necessary as feedback from people with intellectual disabilities about their experience of contact with primary care staff might help to enhance GP knowledge about their health requirements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jar.12072

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perry, J., Felce, D., Kerr, M., Bartley, S., Tomlinson, J., & Felce, J.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Public Health Wales (GB)
Corresponding author
Perry, Jonathan
Venue
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-09-13
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
200-211
ISSN
  • 0952-9608 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-2322
  • 1468-3148
OpenAlex
W2111034435
Cited by
53
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
intellectual disability, primary care, annual health checks, patient experience, health disparities, health care access, general practitioners, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Consumer Behavior, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Primary Health Care, Professional-Patient Relations, Wales, Focus Groups, General Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review