Cited by 36Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionFamily and Disability Support Research

The Impact of Checking the Health of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities on Primary Care Consultation Rates, Health Promotion and Contact with Specialists

Felce, David, Baxter, Helen, Lowe, Kathy, Dunstan, Frank, Houston, Helen, Jones, Glyn, Grey, Jill, Felce, Janet +1 more·2008·Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

Abstract

Background Studies have found that health checking in primary care led to the identification of previously unrecognized morbidity among adults with intellectual disabilities. The aim here was to evaluate whether health checking stimulated increased consultation with the general practitioner or another member of the primary care team, increased health promotion actions undertaken outside the health check or increased contact with specialists. Method Data on the above three categories of activity were abstracted from the medical records of 77 adult participants with intellectual disabilities for eight 6‐month periods before and seven 6 month periods after they had undergone a health check. Comparisons of access to care before and after the health check were made using non‐parametric statistics. Results On average, participants had 5.4 and 1.8 primary care and specialist consultations per year respectively. There were no significant differences in either rate before and after the health check. The frequency of health promotion actions increased significantly after the health check from a mean of 1.2 to 2.2/year. Conclusions Comparison of the primary care and specialist consultations rates of people with intellectual disabilities with those for the general population might suggest that the former have greater access to these services. However, comparison to the general practitioner consultation rates of patients with other chronic conditions would seem to indicate that contact with primary care may not be commensurate with need. Attention to health promotion is inadequate. Further research is required to substantiate whether health checking increases health promotion and how increased health promotion activity would affect the health of this population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2008.00432.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Felce, D., Baxter, H., Lowe, K., Dunstan, F., Houston, H., Jones, G., Grey, J., Felce, J., & Kerr, M.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of Glamorgan (GB)
Venue
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-10-13
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
597-602
ISSN
  • 0952-9608 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-2322
  • 1468-3148
OpenAlex
W2168599010
Cited by
36
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
intellectual disability, primary care visits, health promotion, specialist referral, health care access, adults with intellectual disabilities, general practitioners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review