Cited by 10Dental Health and Care UtilizationDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Could Ethical Tensions in Oral Healthcare Management Revealed by Adults with Intellectual Disabilities and Caregivers Explain Unmet Oral Health Needs? Participatory Research with Focus Groups

Blaizot, Alessandra, Hamel, Olivier, Folliguet, Marysette, Herve, Christian, Meningaud, Jean‐Paul, Trentesaux, Thomas·2017·Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

Abstract

Background: Cognitively impaired patients often present poor oral health status that may be explained by ethical tensions in oral healthcare management. This participatory study explored such tensions among adults with intellectual disabilities and with caregivers. The second objective was to specify, with caregivers, the points that should be developed in a future study among dentists. Materials and Methods: Three focus groups involving adults with intellectual disabilities, family caregivers and professional caregivers were organized in France in 2013. Results: The thematic content analysis identified discrepancies between experiences and expectations, which were particularly marked for the dentist's competence and attitudes, the dentist's role in decisions, the dental care management and the French socio‐political context. Conclusions: These discrepancies could partly explain multiple attempts to find the ‘right’ dentist or the fact that care was abandoned, and could at least contribute to oral health needs being unmet.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jar.12231

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blaizot, A., Hamel, O., Folliguet, M., Herve, C., Meningaud, J., & Trentesaux, T.
Affiliations
  • Université Paris Cité (FR)
  • Laboratory of Medical Ethics and Forensic Medicine EA 4569 University of Paris Descartes Paris France
Corresponding author
Blaizot, Alessandra
Venue
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-11-04
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
172-187
ISSN
  • 0952-9608 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-2322
  • 1468-3148
OpenAlex
W2141347914
Cited by
10
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
intellectual disability, oral health, unmet oral health needs, ethical conflicts, dental care management, family caregivers, professional caregivers, access to dental care
MeSH terms
Adult, Dental Care, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Oral Health, Caregivers, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research, Community-Based Participatory Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review