CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 240Social and Intergroup PsychologyMedia Influence and HealthThemes in Literature Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The greatest magic of Harry Potter: Reducing prejudice

Open access
Vezzali, Loris, Stathi, Sofia, Giovannini, Dino, Capozza, Dora, Trifiletti, Elena·2015·Journal of Applied Social Psychology
DOI 10.1111/jasp.12279
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Recent research shows that extended contact via story reading is a powerful strategy to improve out‐group attitudes. We conducted three studies to test whether extended contact through reading the popular best‐selling books of H arry P otter improves attitudes toward stigmatized groups (immigrants, homosexuals, refugees). Results from one experimental intervention with elementary school children and from two cross‐sectional studies with high school and university students (in I taly and U nited K ingdom) supported our main hypothesis. Identification with the main character (i.e., H arry P otter) and disidentification from the negative character (i.e., V oldemort) moderated the effect. Perspective taking emerged as the process allowing attitude improvement. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed in the context of extended intergroup contact and social cognitive theory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jasp.12279

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 96 references

4 of the 96 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Bandura A., 2002, Media effects: Advances in theory and research, 121
  2. Beers M. J., 2006, The psychology of Harry Potter, 33
  3. Franklin N., 2006, The psychology of Harry Potter, 169
  4. Heilman E. E., 2009, Critical perspectives on Harry Potter
  5. Kelman H. C., 2003, Political psychology, 315
  6. Lolliot S., 2013, Advances in intergroup contact, 81
  7. Mulholland N., 2006, The psychology of Harry Potter
  8. Patrick C. J., 2006, The psychology of Harry Potter, 221
  9. Rowling J. K., 1998, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
  10. Senland A., 2007, Christian perspectives on Harry Potter: Tool of Satan or Christian parable?, Journal of Research in Character Education, 5, 149
  11. Whitney M. P., 2005, Children's moral reading of Harry Potter: Are children and adults reading the same books?, Journal of Research in Character Education, 3, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 240

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., Giovannini, D., Capozza, D., & Trifiletti, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
  • University of Greenwich (GB)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • University of Verona (IT)
Corresponding author
Vezzali, Loris
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07-23
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
105-121
ISSN
  • 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1816
DOI
10.1111/jasp.12279
OpenAlex
W1658184466
Cited by
228
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 1
FWCI
49.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Themes in Literature Analysis
Keywords
Harry Potter, extended contact, prejudice reduction, outgroup attitudes, stigmatized groups, perspective taking, identification with protagonist, disidentification, social cognitive theory, intergroup contact, immigrants, homosexuals, refugees

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review