The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping the Landscape of Future Research Themes in Supply Chain Management
Open accessAbstract
Supply chain researchers are confronted with a dizzying array of research questions, many of which are not mutually independent. This research was motivated by the need to map the landscape of research themes, identify potential overlapping areas and interactions, and provide guidelines on areas of focus for researchers to pursue. We conducted a three‐phase research study, beginning with an open‐ended collection of opinions on research themes collected from 102 supply chain management (SCM) researchers, followed by an evaluation of a consolidated list of themes by 141 SCM researchers. These results were then reviewed by 10 SCM scholars. Potential interactions and areas of overlap were identified, classified, and integrated into a compelling set of ideas for future research in the field of SCM. We believe these ideas provide a forward‐looking view on those themes that will become important, as well as those that researchers believe should be focused on. While areas of research deemed to become most important include big data and analytics, the most under‐researched areas include efforts that target the “people dimension” of SCM, ethical issues and internal integration. The themes are discussed in the context of current developments that the authors believe will provide a valuable foundation for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach
Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., & Zhao, X. (2010) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.06.001 · Cited by 3,310
Learning by Thinking: How Reflection Aids Performance
Di Stefano, G., Pisano, G., & Staats, B. R. (2015) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2015.12709abstract · Cited by 42 · cited 1×
“Reflection at the right time has been shown to be one of the most critical components of learning (Di Stefano et al. 2015).”
Background
Cited by
Digital transformation: A review and research agenda
Plekhanov, D., Franke, H., & Netland, T. H. (2023) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2022.09.007 · Cited by 606
Haddud, A., DeSouza, A., Khare, A., & Lee, H. (2017) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/jmtm-05-2017-0094 · Cited by 373
Friedman, N., & Ormiston, J. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121403 · Cited by 365
Defining Supply Chain Management: In the Past, Present, and Future
Min, S., Zacharia, Z. G., & Smith, C. D. (2019) · Journal of Business Logistics · doi:10.1111/jbl.12201 · Cited by 357
Why manufacturers adopt additive manufacturing technologies: The role of sustainability
Niaki, M. K., Torabi, S. A., & Nonino, F. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.019 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Wieland, A., Handfield, R. B., & Durach, C. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Logistics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-08-04
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 205-212
- ISSN
- 0735-3766 (ISSN-L)
- 2158-1592
- OpenAlex
- W2480813438
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 43.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mapping the Landscape of Future Research Themes in Supply Chain Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jbl.12131
- The paper
- Wieland, A., Handfield, R. B., & Durach, C. F. (2016). Mapping the Landscape of Future Research Themes in Supply Chain Management. Journal of Business Logistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12131
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.