Cited by 22Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlVestibular and auditory disorders

Norepinephrine transport inhibition for treatment of vasovagal syncope

SHELDON, ROBERT S., RITCHIE, DEBBIE, MCRAE, MAUREEN, RAJ, SATISH·2013·Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Norepinephrine transporter inhibitors, such as sibutramine, have been shown to prevent vasovagal syncope induced by tilt testing in healthy volunteers. As a test of concept we assessed whether sibutramine prevents fainting in highly symptomatic VVS patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was an open label, dose-ranging protocol of sibutramine 10, 15, and 20 mg daily for ≥4 weeks per dose, with progression dictated by response and tolerance. Responders were predefined as having >50% reduction in spell frequency, compared to baseline spell frequency. The cohort included seven subjects (6 women; 32 ± 7 years) who had a median of 593 faints over a median of 180 months. The patients had had 7 ± 4 previous treatment attempts without a satisfactory response. The mean duration of exposure to 10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg doses were 45 ± 33 days, 98 ± 89 days, and 137 ± 83 days. Six patients tolerated the maximum dose, and 1 patient dropped out due to adverse effects at 15 mg/day. The median frequency of spells at baseline, 10, 15, and 20 mg/day was 12, 4.4, 2.8, and 1 events/28 days (P = 0.0048). Five patients were responders and 2 were nonresponders. Among responders, the median frequency of spells at baseline, 10, 15, and 20 mg/day was 14, 4.8, 0.8, and 0.4 events per 28 days (P = 0.0089). No patients developed hypertension. CONCLUSION: In this open label series, sibutramine prevented vasovagal syncope in most highly symptomatic patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jce.12111

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an open-label prospective clinical study in seven very symptomatic patients who had not responded to any previous treatment, sibutramine achieved 94% suppression of syncopal episodes at 6 months.

    “In an open-label prospective clinical study in seven very symptomatic patients who had not responded to any previous treatment, sibutramine achieved 94% suppression of syncopal episodes at 6 months. 289”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SHELDON, R. S., RITCHIE, D., MCRAE, M., & RAJ, S.
Affiliations
  • Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta (CA)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
SHELDON, ROBERT S.
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-02-27
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
799-803
ISSN
  • 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8167
OpenAlex
W1495046225
Cited by
22
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
vasovagal syncope, norepinephrine reuptake inhibition, sibutramine, syncope prevention, syncope, dose-ranging
MeSH terms
Adult, Cyclobutanes, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Syncope, Vasovagal, Norepinephrine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review