The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The quest for accuracy of blood pressure measuring devices
Open accessAbstract
The accuracy of blood pressure (BP) measuring devices is fundamental to good practice and scientific research. International guidelines on BP measurement are provided for clinicians who diagnose and treat patients with hypertension, clinical researchers who conduct trials on the efficacy of BP lowering drugs and interventional strategies, epidemiologists who conduct population surveys to determine the demographic consequences of hypertension on society, and researchers who perform meta‐analyses on published research to further influence the practice of medicine and the provision of resources. Although the outcomes of the endeavors of all these groups are dependent on the accuracy of BP measurements, the equipment is often of doubtful accuracy and the methodology of measurement is often poorly described and frequently not standardized. Thus, the fundamental element of hypertension evaluation has been largely ignored by both clinical practitioners and scientific researchers. Here, the authors briefly review the development of efforts to improve and validate the accuracy of BP measuring devices and highlight the deficiencies that persist. We conclude that, to protect the public from the serious consequences of inaccurate BP measurements, the following steps are required: (1) regulatory requirement for mandatory independent validation of all BP measuring devices using a universal protocol; (2) accreditation of laboratories for the performance of BP device validations; (3) online evaluation of validation studies with detection of protocol violations prior to publication of results; and (4) establishment of an independent scientific forum for the listing of accurate BP measuring devices.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Current guidelines recommend HBPM as a method for the evaluation of BP in untreated individuals with suspected hypertension and for monitoring long-term BP control in treated hypertensive patients.
“Consequently, current guidelines recommend also HBPM as a method for the evaluation of BP in untreated individuals with suspected hypertension and, more so, for monitoring the long-term BP control in treated hypertensive patients [4,169]”
Citations
Cites
Zhou, B., Bentham, J., Di Cesare, M., Bixby, H., Danaei, G., Cowan, M. J., Paciorek, C. J., Singh, G., Hajifathalian, K., Bennett, J. E., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31919-5 · Cited by 2,579
Self-citationStergiou, G. S., Alpert, B., Mieke, S., Asmar, R., Atkins, N., Eckert, S., Frick, G., Friedman, B., Graßl, T., Ichikawa, T., et al. (2018) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000001634 · Cited by 278
Self-citationThe pursuit of accurate blood pressure measurement: A 35‐year travail
O'Brien, E., & Stergiou, G. S. (2017) · The Journal of Clinical Hypertension · doi:10.1111/jch.13005 · Cited by 39
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60265-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31134-5 · DOI
- O'Brien E, 1991, Blood Pressure Measurement (Handbook of Hypertension), 1
- 10.1097/00126097-200410000-00004 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(64)92408-0 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.284.6308.18 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(63)92929-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/0140-6736(90)93177-Q · DOI
- 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001635 · DOI
- 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10237 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283360eaf · DOI
- 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833eafd8 · DOI
- Turner MJ, 2010, Can we trust automatic sphygmomanometer validations?, J Hypertens, 28, 2353, 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833e1011 · DOI
- 10.7326/M14-1539 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parati, G., Stergiou, G. S., Bilo, G., Kollias, A., Pengo, M., Ochoa, J. E., Agarwal, R., Asayama, K., Asmar, R., Burnier, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000002922 · Cited by 178
Self-citationSharman, J. E., O’Brien, E., Alpert, B., Schutte, A. E., Delles, C., Hecht Olsen, M., Asmar, R., Atkins, N., Barbosa, E., Calhoun, D., et al. (2020) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000002246 · Cited by 139
Self-citationPadwal, R., Campbell, N. R. C., Schutte, A. E., Olsen, M. H., Delles, C., Etyang, A., Cruickshank, J. K., Stergiou, G., Rakotz, M. K., Wozniak, G., et al. (2019) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000002112 · Cited by 108
Self-citationSharman, J. E., Ordunez, P., Brady, T., Parati, G., Stergiou, G., Whelton, P. K., Padwal, R., Olsen, M. H., Delles, C., Schutte, A. E., et al. (2022) · Journal of Human Hypertension · doi:10.1038/s41371-022-00747-0 · Cited by 31
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Brien, E., Stergiou, G. S., & Turner, M. J.
- Affiliations
- University College Dublin (IE)
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
- University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- O'Brien, Eoin
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Hypertension
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1092-1095
- ISSN
- 1524-6175 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7176
- PMC
- PMC8031088
- OpenAlex
- W2884617283
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Hypertension (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
- Keywords
- blood pressure measurement, measurement accuracy, blood pressure measuring devices, hypertension, device validation, laboratory accreditation, measurement standardization
- MeSH terms
- Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Equipment Design, Humans, Hypertension, Reproducibility of Results, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Medical Device Legislation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review