Cited by 18Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesClinical practice guidelines implementationNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The quest for accuracy of blood pressure measuring devices

Open access
O'Brien, Eoin, Stergiou, George S., Turner, Martin J.·2018·The Journal of Clinical Hypertension

Abstract

The accuracy of blood pressure (BP) measuring devices is fundamental to good practice and scientific research. International guidelines on BP measurement are provided for clinicians who diagnose and treat patients with hypertension, clinical researchers who conduct trials on the efficacy of BP lowering drugs and interventional strategies, epidemiologists who conduct population surveys to determine the demographic consequences of hypertension on society, and researchers who perform meta‐analyses on published research to further influence the practice of medicine and the provision of resources. Although the outcomes of the endeavors of all these groups are dependent on the accuracy of BP measurements, the equipment is often of doubtful accuracy and the methodology of measurement is often poorly described and frequently not standardized. Thus, the fundamental element of hypertension evaluation has been largely ignored by both clinical practitioners and scientific researchers. Here, the authors briefly review the development of efforts to improve and validate the accuracy of BP measuring devices and highlight the deficiencies that persist. We conclude that, to protect the public from the serious consequences of inaccurate BP measurements, the following steps are required: (1) regulatory requirement for mandatory independent validation of all BP measuring devices using a universal protocol; (2) accreditation of laboratories for the performance of BP device validations; (3) online evaluation of validation studies with detection of protocol violations prior to publication of results; and (4) establishment of an independent scientific forum for the listing of accurate BP measuring devices.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jch.13279

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60265-3 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31134-5 · DOI
  4. O'Brien E, 1991, Blood Pressure Measurement (Handbook of Hypertension), 1
  5. 10.1097/00126097-200410000-00004 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0140-6736(64)92408-0 · DOI
  7. 10.1136/bmj.284.6308.18 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(63)92929-5 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0140-6736(90)93177-Q · DOI
  10. 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001635 · DOI
  11. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10237 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283360eaf · DOI
  13. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833eafd8 · DOI
  14. Turner MJ, 2010, Can we trust automatic sphygmomanometer validations?, J Hypertens, 28, 2353, 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833e1011 · DOI
  15. 10.7326/M14-1539 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
O'Brien, E., Stergiou, G. S., & Turner, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Corresponding author
O'Brien, Eoin
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-07
Volume
20
Issue
7
Pages
1092-1095
ISSN
  • 1524-6175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7176
OpenAlex
W2884617283
Cited by
18
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
blood pressure measurement, measurement accuracy, blood pressure measuring devices, hypertension, device validation, laboratory accreditation, measurement standardization
MeSH terms
Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Equipment Design, Humans, Hypertension, Reproducibility of Results, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Medical Device Legislation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review