Cited by 278Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A universal standard for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Collaboration Statement

Open access

Abstract

: In the last 30 years, several organizations, such as the US Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI), the British Hypertension Society, the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) Working Group on Blood Pressure (BP) Monitoring and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) have developed protocols for clinical validation of BP measuring devices. However, it is recognized that science, as well as patients, consumers and manufacturers would be best served if all BP measuring devices were assessed for accuracy according to an agreed single validation protocol that had global acceptance. Therefore, an international initiative was taken by AAMI, ESH and ISO experts who agreed to develop a universal standard for device validation. This statement presents the key aspects of a validation procedure, which were agreed by the AAMI, ESH and ISO representatives as the basis for a single universal validation protocol. As soon as the AAMI/ESH/ISO standard is fully developed, this will be regarded as the single universal standard and will replace all other previous standards/protocols.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hjh.0000000000001634

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. O’Brien, 1993, The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices, J Hypertens, 11, S43

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 278

Metadata

Authors
Stergiou, G. S., Alpert, B., Mieke, S., Asmar, R., Atkins, N., Eckert, S., Frick, G., Friedman, B., Graßl, T., Ichikawa, T., Ioannidis, J. P., Lacy, P., McManus, R., Murray, A., Myers, M., Palatini, P., Parati, G., Quinn, D., Sarkis, J., Shennan, A., Usuda, T., Wang, J., Wu, C. O., & O’Brien, E.
Affiliations
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
  • Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (DE)
  • Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia (DE)
  • General Electric (United States) (US)
  • Dräger (Germany) (DE)
  • Omron (Japan) (JP)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT)
  • Welch Allyn (United States) (US)
  • St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
  • Nihon Kohden (Japan) (JP)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Stergiou, George S.
  • Asmar, Roland
  • Atkins, Neil
  • Ioannidis, John P.
  • Myers, Martin
  • Palatini, Paolo
  • Parati, Gianfranco
  • Shennan, Andrew
Venue
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2018-03
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
472-478
ISSN
0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2787867538
Cited by
278
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10
FWCI
14.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR-RP-02-12-015)
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 HL999999)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N025342/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Keywords
blood pressure measuring devices, device validation, validation protocol, measurement accuracy, international standardization, AAMI, European Society of Hypertension, ISO, hypertension monitoring
MeSH terms
Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Humans, Hypertension, International Cooperation, Research Design, Reproducibility of Results, Sphygmomanometers, Consensus, Validation Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review