Cited by 42

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exosomal microRNA‐26b‐5p down‐regulates ATF2 to enhance radiosensitivity of lung adenocarcinoma cells

Han, Fushi, Huang, Dongdong, Huang, Xinghong, Wang, Wei, Yang, Shusong, Chen, Shuzhen·2020·Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine

Abstract

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), as the most common subtype of non‐small cell lung cancer, is responsible for more than 500 000 deaths worldwide annually. In this study, we identify a novel microRNA‐26b‐5p (miR‐26b‐5p) and elucidated its function on LUAD. The survival rate of parent LUAD cells and radiation‐resistant LUAD cells were determined using clonogenic survival assay. We overexpressed or inhibited miR‐26b‐5p in LUAD, and the correlation between activating transcription factor 2 (ATF2) and miR‐26b‐5p was determined using integrated bioinformatics analysis and dual‐luciferase reporter gene assay. Exosomes derived from A549 cell lines were then detected using Western blot assay, followed by co‐transfection with radiation‐resistant A549R cells. LUAD tissues and serum were collected, followed by miR‐26b‐5p relative expression quantification using RT‐qPCR. miR‐26b‐5p was identified as the most differentially expressed miRNA and was down‐regulated in LUAD. Radiation‐resistant cells were more resistant to X‐radiation compared with parent cells. miR‐26b‐5p overexpression and X‐irradiation led to enhanced radiosensitivity of LUAD cells. ATF2 was negatively targeted by miR‐26b‐5p. Exosomal miR‐26b‐5p derived from A549 cells could be transported to irradiation‐resistant LUAD cells and inhibit ATF2 expression to promote DNA damage, apoptosis and radiosensitivity of LUAD cells, which was verified using serum‐based miR‐26b‐5p. Our results show a regulatory network of miR‐26b‐5p on radiosensitivity of LUAD cells, which may serve as a non‐invasive biomarker for LUAD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcmm.15402

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1038/nature13385 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1093/jnci/djv059 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/cncr.30794 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/ijc.28290 · DOI
  5. 10.18632/oncotarget.6248 · DOI
  6. Hirata H, 2013, Association between egfr‐tki resistance and efficacy of radiotherapy for brain metastases from egfr‐mutant lung adenocarcinoma, Anticancer Res, 33, 1649
  7. 10.1038/nrd3179 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nm.2284 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.047 · DOI
  10. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0577 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/bjc.2016.179 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s13277-016-4964-7 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.gene.2018.05.008 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/bjc.2015.201 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1159/000487006 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nrc2681 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s13277-016-4906-4 · DOI
  18. 10.1126/scisignal.aac6479 · DOI
  19. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1433 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.mrrev.2015.07.001 · DOI
  21. Steffen JD, 2016, Fluorescent sensors of parp‐1 structural dynamics and allosteric regulation in response to DNA damage, Nucleic Acids Res, 44, 9771
  22. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.08.022 · DOI
  23. 10.1136/gutjnl‐2019‐318903 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/s41467-019-14100-6 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/s41388-019-0771-0 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/nrg.2016.134 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.054 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/hep.29374 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.04.044 · DOI
  30. 10.3892/ijo.2014.2386 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/cddis.2017.434 · DOI
  32. 10.1667/RR1851.1 · DOI
  33. 10.1371/journal.pone.0023802 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/onc.2015.22 · DOI
  35. 10.1155/2018/5109497 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.016 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/nm.3562 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.035 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/cncr.27895 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 42

Metadata

Authors
Han, F., Huang, D., Huang, X., Wang, W., Yang, S., & Chen, S.
Venue
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-05-31
Volume
24
Issue
14
Pages
7730-7742
ISSN
  • 1582-1838
  • 1582-4934
Cited by
42
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review