A Bad Workman Blames His Tweets: The Consequences of Citizens' Uncivil Twitter Use When Interacting With Party Candidates: Incivility in Interactions With Candidates on Twitter
Open accessAbstract
Existing studies focusing on politicians' adoption of Twitter have found that they use it primarily as a broadcasting tool. We argue that citizens' impolite and/or uncivil behavior is one possible explanation for such decisions. Social media conversations are rife with harassment and politicians are a prime target. This alters the incentive structure of engaging in dialogue on social media. We use Spanish, Greek, German, and U.K. candidates' tweets sent during the run-up to the recent European Parliament elections, and rely on automated text analysis and machine learning methods to measure their level of civility. Our contribution is an actor-oriented theory of political dialogue that incorporates Twitter's specific affordances, clarifying how and why Twitter's democratic promise may be limited.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hostility can be investigated in big data corpora by training a machine learning classifier to identify uncivil communication styles.
“Theocharis et al. (2016) have shown how hostility can be investigated in big data corpora by training a machine learning classifier to identify uncivil communication styles.”
From When debates break apart: discursive polarization as a multi-dimensional divergence emerging in and through communication (2023) · cites this paper as Theocharis et al., 2016
Cites
Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data
Barberá, P. (2015) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpu011 · Cited by 982 · see citing works
Self-citationThe dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network
González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., Rivero, A., & Moreno, Y. (2011) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00197 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
The Critical Periphery in the Growth of Social Protests
Barberá, P., Wang, N., Bonneau, R., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J., & González-Bailón, S. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143611 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Political Effects of the Internet and Social Media
Zhuravskaya, E., Petrova, M., & Enikolopov, R. (2020) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-050239 · Cited by 560 · see citing works
Which politicians receive abuse? Four factors illuminated in the UK general election 2019
Gorrell, G., Bakir, M. E., Roberts, I., Greenwood, M. A., & Bontcheva, K. (2020) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-020-00236-9 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Brüggemann, M., & Meyer, H. (2023) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtad012 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
- Authors
- Theocharis, Y., Barberá, P., Fazekas, Z., Popa, S. A., & Parnet, O.
- Affiliations
- University of Mannheim (DE)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Kantar Public; Brussels 1160 Belgium
- Venue
- Journal of Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-10-28
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1007-1031
- ISSN
- 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2220275476
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 39.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
- Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Keywords
- Twitter, political civility, online harassment, political candidates, political dialogue, social media affordances, European Parliament elections, political communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review