Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 215

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical and microbiological effects of probiotic lozenges in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: a 1‐year follow‐up study

Open access
Tekce, Merve, Ince, Gizem, Gursoy, Hare, Dirikan Ipci, Sebnem, Cakar, Gokser, Kadir, Tanju, Yılmaz, Selçuk·2015·Journal of Clinical Periodontology

Abstract

Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of lozenges containing L. reuteri as an adjuvant treatment to initial periodontal therapy for chronic periodontitis patients and to detect the level of L. reuteri colonization in the periodontal pockets of treated patients. Material and Methods: A total of 40 patients were selected and randomly divided into two groups. Each patient had at least two teeth with one approximal site each with a probing depth (PD) of 5–7 mm and gingival index (GI) of ≥2 in each quadrant. Group I received scaling and root planing (SRP) plus L. reuteri‐containing lozenges, and Group II received SRP plus placebo. The plaque index (PI), GI, bleeding on probing (BoP), PD and relative attachment level were measured. Microbiological sampling was performed at baseline and on days 21, 90, 180 and 360 and were analysed by culturing. The Bonferroni‐corrected paired sample t‐test, Bonferroni‐corrected Wilcoxon signed rank test and paired sample t‐test were used to evaluate intra‐group differences. The Bonferroni‐corrected Student's t‐test and the Mann–Whitney U‐tests were used to evaluate inter‐group differences. Results: After treatment, the measured PI, GI, BoP and PD were significantly (p < 0.05) lower in Group I compared with Group II at all time points. Similar observations were made for the total viable cell counts and the proportions of obligate anaerobes with the exception of day 360. In Group I, significantly fewer patients required surgery on ≥3 sites. Conclusion: L. reuteri‐containing lozenges may be a useful adjuvant agent to slow re‐colonization and improve clinical outcomes of chronic periodontitis. Further studies are required to clarify the optimal dose of the lozenges.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpe.12387

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 215

Metadata

Authors
Tekce, M., Ince, G., Gursoy, H., Dirikan Ipci, S., Cakar, G., Kadir, T., & Yılmaz, S.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
363-372
ISSN
  • 0303-6979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-051X
OpenAlex
W1970397496
Cited by
215
References
5
FWCI
15.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical and microbiological effects of probiotic lozenges in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: a 1‐year follow‐up study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jcpe.12387
The paper
Tekce, M., Ince, G., Gursoy, H., Dirikan Ipci, S., Cakar, G., Kadir, T., & Yılmaz, S. (2015). Clinical and microbiological effects of probiotic lozenges in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: a 1‐year follow‐up study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12387

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.