Cited by 14Body Image and Dysmorphia StudiesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Practitioner Review: Assessment and treatment of body dysmorphic disorder in young people

Open access
Krebs, Georgina, Rautio, Daniel, Fernández de la Cruz, Lorena, Hartmann, Andrea S., Jassi, Amita, Martin, Alexandra, Stringaris, Argyris, Mataix‐Cols, David·2024·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is a relatively common and highly impairing mental disorder that is strikingly underdiagnosed and undertreated in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). The only clinical guidelines for the management of BDD in youth were published nearly 20 years ago, when empirical knowledge was sparse. Fortunately, there has been a surge in research into BDD over the last 10 years, shedding important insights into the phenomenology, epidemiology, assessment and treatment of the disorder in young people. This review aimed to provide an overview of recent research developments of relevance to clinicians and healthcare policymakers. We summarise key findings regarding the epidemiology of BDD in youth, which indicate that the disorder usually develops during teenage years and affects approximately 2% of adolescents at any one point in time. We provide an overview of aetiological research, highlighting that BDD arises from an interplay between genetic and environmental influences. We then focus on screening and assessment strategies, arguing that these are crucial to promote detection and diagnosis of this under‐recognised condition. Additionally, we summarise the recommended treatment approaches for BDD in youth, namely cognitive behaviour therapy with or without selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The review concludes by highlighting key knowledge gaps and priorities for future research including, but not limited to, better understanding aetiological factors, long‐term consequences and treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpp.13984

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescents with BDD frequently experience co-occurring conditions such as major depressive disorder, OCD, anxiety disorders, and eating disorders.

    “Adolescents with BDD frequently experience co-occurring conditions such as MDD, OCD, anxiety disorders, and eating disorders [120].”

    From The Impact of Social Media & Technology on Child and Adolescent Mental Health (2025) · cites this paper as [120]

    The comorbidity section (p. 4) says approximately 70% of young people with BDD have an additional diagnosis and identifies depressive disorders, social anxiety disorder, and eating disorders as particularly common. Initial assessment (p. 5) also names OCD as a common co-occurring disorder. The paper says depression or depressive disorders, but does not specifically identify major depressive disorder (MDD). (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Untreated BDD often follows a chronic trajectory, increasing the risk of severe distress, functional impairment, and suicidality.

    “The disorder is frequently underdiagnosed due to limited clinical awareness and stigma, and untreated cases often follow a chronic trajectory, increasing the risk of severe distress, functional impairment, and suicidality [120].”

    From The Impact of Social Media & Technology on Child and Adolescent Mental Health (2025) · cites this paper as [120]

    The review reports that BDD is underdiagnosed partly because of limited clinician awareness and reluctance to disclose symptoms (screening and assessment, p. 5). It also describes substantial impairment and suicide risk in young people with BDD (Introduction, p. 1; impact and comorbidity, pp. 2–4). It does not establish that untreated cases often follow a chronic course or that remaining untreated increases those risks. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • BDD is frequently underdiagnosed due to limited clinical awareness and stigma.

    “The disorder is frequently underdiagnosed due to limited clinical awareness and stigma, and untreated cases often follow a chronic trajectory, increasing the risk of severe distress, functional impairment, and suicidality [120].”
  • BDD is often mistaken for typical adolescent body image concerns, leading to delays in diagnosis and treatment.

    “The disorder is often mistaken for typical adolescent body image concerns, leading to delays in diagnosis and treatment [120].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ahmadpanah, M., Arji, M., Arji, J., Haghighi, M., Jahangard, L., Sadeghi Bahmani, D., & Brand, S. (2019). Sociocultural attitudes towards appearance, self-esteem and symptoms of body-dysmorphic disorders among young adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , 16 , 4236.
  2. Albertini, R.S., & Phillips, K.A. (1999). Thirty-three cases of body dysmorphic disorder in children and adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry , 38 , 453 -459.
  3. Angelakis, I., Gooding, P.A., & Panagioti, M. (2016). Suicidality in body dysmorphic disorder (BDD): A systematic review with meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review , 49 , 55 -66.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krebs, G., Rautio, D., Fernández de la Cruz, L., Hartmann, A. S., Jassi, A., Martin, A., Stringaris, A., & Mataix‐Cols, D.
Affiliations
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Region Stockholm (SE)
  • Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Healthcare Services, Region Stockholm Stockholm Sweden
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
  • University of Wuppertal (DE)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Krebs, Georgina
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-05-08
Volume
65
Issue
8
Pages
1119-1131
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W4396744244
Cited by
14
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
body dysmorphic disorder, adolescents, child and adolescent mental health services, etiology, genetic and environmental factors, screening evaluation, cognitive behavioral therapy, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, underdiagnosis, treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Body Dysmorphic Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review