Cited by 77Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Reported prevalence of gestational diabetes in Scotland: The relationship with obesity, age, socioeconomic status, smoking and macrosomia, and how many are we missing?

Open access
Collier, Andrew, Abraham, E Christie, Armstrong, Julie, Godwin, Jon, Monteath, Kirsten, Lindsay, Robert·2017·Journal of Diabetes Investigation

Abstract

Aims/Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is defined as ‘carbohydrate intolerance of varying degrees of severity with onset or first recognition during pregnancy,’ and is associated with increased fetal and maternal risks. The aims of the present study were to investigate the prevalence of GDM in Scotland over 32 years (1981–2012), and using the data from 2012, to assess how GDM related to maternal body mass index, maternal age, parity, smoking, Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation, infant gender and macrosomia status. Materials and Methods: GDM prevalence along with anthropometric, obstetric and demographic data were collected on a total of 1,891,097 women with a delivery episode between 1 January 1981 and 31 December 2012 using data extracted from the Scottish Morbidity Record 02. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was undertaken to investigate their association with GDM. Results: A ninefold increase in GDM prevalence was observed from 1981 to 2012 (P < 0.001). GDM prevalence in 2012 was 1.9%. Maternal body mass index, age, parity status, Scottish index of multiple deprivation and fetal macrosomia were positively associated with GDM. Reported smoking status at booking was inversely associated with GDM. Multivariable analysis showed that fetal macrosomia was not associated with GDM status. Conclusions: The present study confirmed that the reporting of GDM is low in Scotland, and that GDM is associated with maternal body mass index, maternal age, multiparity and social deprivation. GDM was negatively associated with smoking and requires further investigation. The lack of association between GDM and macrosomia (following multivariate analysis) might reflect the screening processes undertaken in Scotland.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jdi.12552

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Scotland, Collier et al. analyzed Scottish Morbidity Record 02 between 1981 and 2012 and showed a 9-fold increase in GDM prevalence, with a result of 1.9% in 2012.

    “Collier et al. analyzed data from the Scottish Morbidity Record 02 between 1981 and 2012, and they showed 9-fold increase in the GDM prevalence during this time, with a result of 1.9% in 2012.”
  • In Scotland, BMI, maternal age, social deprivation, and multiparity were positively correlated with GDM.

    “In addition, they confirmed that BMI, maternal age, social deprivation, and multiparity were positively correlated with GDM [159].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. [1]Metzger BE, Coustan DR. Summary and recommendations of the Fourth International Workshop‐Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 1998; 21(Suppl 2): 161– 167. 9704245
  2. [2]World Health Organisation (WHO). Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy. Geneva: WHO 2013 Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/85975/1/WHO_NMH_MND_13.2_eng.pdf Accessed December 5, 2015. 24199271
  3. [3]Ovesen PG, Jensen DM, Damm P, et al Maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes. A nation‐wide study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 28: 1720– 1724. 25228278
  4. [4]Xiong X, Saunders L, Wang F, et al Gestational diabetes mellitus: prevalence, risk factors, maternal and infant outcomes. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2001; 75: 221– 228. 11728481
  5. [5]Lawlor DA, Smith GD, O'Callaghan M, et al Epidemiologic Evidence for the Fetal Overnutrition Hypothesis: findings from the Mater‐University Study of Pregnancy and Its Outcomes. Am J Epidemiol 2007; 165: 418– 424. 17158475
  6. [6]Stotland NE, Caughey AB, Breed EM, et al Risk factors and obstetric complications associated with macrosomia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 87: 220– 226. 15548393
  7. [7]Bellamy L, Casas J, Hingorani A, et al Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Lancet 2009; 373: 1773– 1779. 19465232
  8. [8]Engeland A, Bjørge T, Daltveit AK, et al Risk of diabetes after gestational diabetes and preeclampsia. A registry‐based study of 230,000 women in Norway. Eur J Epidemiol 2011; 26: 157– 163. 21298469 PMC3043244
  9. [9]Lawlor DA, Fraser A, Lindsay R, et al Association of existing diabetes, gestational diabetes and glycosuria in pregnancy with macrosomia and offspring body mass index, waist and fat mass in later childhood: findings from a prospective pregnancy cohort. Diabetologia 2010; 53: 89– 97. 19841891
  10. [10]Wright C, Rifas‐Shiman S, Rich‐Edwards J, et al Intrauterine exposure to gestational diabetes, child adiposity, and blood pressure. Am J Hypertens 2009; 22: 215– 220. 19023272 PMC2761640
  11. [11]Bilous R. Diagnosis of gestational diabetes, defining the net, refining the catch. Diabetologia 2015; 58: 1965– 1968. 26173673
  12. [16]Harley K, Jones C. Quality of Scottish Morbidity Record (SMR) data. Health Bull (Edin) 1996; 54: 410– 417. 8936810
  13. [17]Kendrick S, Clarke J. The Scottish record linkage system. Health Bull (Edinb) 1993; 51: 72– 79. 8514493
  14. [19]Stirrat LI, Denison FC, Love CDB, et al Screening and management of gestational diabetes mellitus in Scottish obstetric units: a national survey. Scot Med J 2015; 60: 37– 43. 25475973
  15. [20]Janghorbani M, Stenhouse EA, Jones RB, et al Is neighbourhood deprivation a risk factor for gestational diabetes mellitus? Diab Med 2006; 23: 313– 317. 16492216
  16. [21]Heslehurst N, Ells L, Simpson H, et al Trends in maternal obesity incidence rates, demographic predictors, and health inequalities in 36,821 women over a 15‐year period. BJOG 2007; 114: 187– 194. 17305899
  17. [22]Wendland E, Pinto M, Duncan B, et al Cigarette smoking and risk of gestational diabetes: a systematic review of observational studies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2008; 8: 53– 58. 19077324 PMC2632653
  18. [23]Terry PD, Weiderpass E, Östenson C, et al Cigarette smoking and the risk of gestational and pregestational diabetes in two consecutive pregnancies. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 2994– 2998. 14578229
  19. [24]Solomon C, Willett W, Carey V, et al A prospective study of pregravid determinants of gestational diabetes mellitus. JAMA 1997; 278: 1078– 1083. 9315766
  20. [25]Chiolero A, Faeh D, Paccaud F, et al Consequences of smoking for body weight, body fat distribution, and insulin resistance. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 87: 801– 809. 18400700
  21. [26]Buckley BS, Harreiter J, Damm P, et al Gestational diabetes mellitus in Europe: prevalence, current screening practice and barriers to screening. A review. Diabet Med 2012; 29: 844– 854. 22150506
  22. [27]Scott DA, Loveman E, McIntyre L, et al Screening for gestational diabetes: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2002; 6: 1– 161. 12433317
  23. [31]Meek CL, Lewis HB, Patient C, et al Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: falling through the net. Diabetologia 2015; 58: 2003– 2012. 26071759 PMC4526580

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collier, A., Abraham, E. C., Armstrong, J., Godwin, J., Monteath, K., & Lindsay, R.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Ayr (GB)
  • Institute for Applied Health Research Institute for Society and Social Justice Research Glasgow Scotland UK
  • Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
  • ISD Scotland Edinburgh UK
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Collier, Andrew
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-08-27
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
161-167
ISSN
  • 2040-1116 (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-1124
OpenAlex
W2467412204
Cited by
77
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Investigation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ResearchOnline (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, prevalence trends, maternal body mass index, maternal obesity, maternal age, parity, socioeconomic deprivation, smoking during pregnancy, macrosomia, GDM screening, Scotland
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Female, Fetal Macrosomia, Humans, Pregnancy, Scotland, Smoking, Social Class, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Diabetes, Gestational, Diabetes Complications, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review