Cited by 117Genital Health and DiseaseReproductive tract infections researchSexual function and dysfunction studies

2016 European guideline for the management of vulval conditions

van der Meijden, W.I., Boffa, M.J., ter Harmsel, W.A., Kirtschig, G., Lewis, F.M., Moyal‐Barracco, M., Tiplica, G.S., Sherrard, J.·2017·Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Abstract

Vulval conditions may present to a variety of clinicians, such as dermatologists, gynaecologists and general practitioners. Women with these conditions are best managed by a multidisciplinary approach, which includes clear referral pathways between disciplines or access to a specialist multidisciplinary vulval service. Informed consent is a prerequisite for all examinations, investigations and treatments. Consent is particularly important for intimate examinations of the anogenital area, and a chaperone should be offered in all cases. All efforts should be made to maintain a patient's dignity. Depending on symptoms and risk factors, screening for sexually transmitted infections (STI) should be considered. If the patient presents with vulval itch, particularly if also complaining of increased vaginal discharge, vulvaginal candidiasis should be excluded. Sexual dysfunction should be considered in all patients with vulval complaints, either as the cause of the symptoms or secondary to symptoms, and assessed if appropriate. This guideline covers several aspects, such as diagnosis and treatment, of the more common vulval conditions (relatively) often encountered at vulval clinics, i.e. vulval dermatitis (eczema), psoriasis, lichen simplex chronicus, lichen sclerosus, lichen planus, vulvodynia and vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jdv.14096

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Meijden, W. I., Boffa, M. J., ter Harmsel, W. A., Kirtschig, G., Lewis, F. M., Moyal‐Barracco, M., Tiplica, G. S., & Sherrard, J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Dermatology Beatrixziekenhuis Gorinchem The Netherlands
  • Sir Paul Boffa Hospital (MT)
  • Department of Gynaecology Roosevelt kliniek Leiden The Netherlands
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (DE)
  • St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
  • Hôpital Cochin (FR)
  • Dermatology 2 Colentina Clinical Hospital “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest Romania
  • Churchill Hospital (GB)
Venue
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-06
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
925-941
ISSN
  • 0926-9959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3083
OpenAlex
W2587034066
Cited by
117
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3
FWCI
13.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
vulvodynia, lichen simplex chronicus, lichen sclerosus, lichen planus, sexually transmitted infections, sexual dysfunction, informed consent, molecular chaperones, diagnosis and treatment
MeSH terms
Europe, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Vulvar Diseases, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review