Cited by 19Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management

Digital health interventions in dermatology—Mapping technology and study parameters of systematically identified publications

Open access
Reinders, Patrick, Augustin, Matthias, Kirsten, Natalia, Fleyder, Anastasia, Otten, Marina·2023·Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Abstract

Digital health interventions (DHI) potentially improve the efficiency and effectiveness of dermatological care. Currently, an overview clustering and characterizing the evidence on DHIs is missing. This systematic mapping of the literature aims to analyse published research on DHIs in dermatology to identify trends and gaps in research. For this purpose, a systematic search of the MEDLINE database was conducted in August 2022 to identify original publications on DHIs in dermatology. Data on country, targeted audience, DHI category, indication, outcome parameter and study design were extracted. Out of 12,009 records identified in MEDLINE, 403 studies were included in the final analysis. Studies on DHIs mainly performed in western countries, headed by the United States ( n = 133), Germany ( n = 32) and Spain ( n = 23). Of all identified DHIs, 261 targeted healthcare providers (HCP), 66 clients (e.g. patients, caregivers, healthy individuals) and 67 both clients and HCPs. A majority of DHIs focussed on establishing a diagnosis ( n = 254). Every other study analysed store‐and‐forward teledermatology ( n = 187), followed by artificial intelligence applications for image analysis ( n = 65). The most often analysed DHI category for clients was a support of health behaviour change ( n = 31). Monitoring of clients was targeted by 77 studies. Skin cancer ( n = 148), wounds ( n = 29) and psoriasis ( n = 29) were the most targeted indications by DHIs. Most studies analysed diagnostic performance ( n = 166), fewer studies analysed acceptance ( n = 92) and effectiveness ( n = 98). Usability ( n = 32) and efficiency ( n = 36) were investigated only to a small extent. Studies on DHIs in dermatology have focused on teledermatology and AI applications, with an emphasis on skin cancer diagnosis. Apart from that, a range of DHIs for different user groups, purposes and indications were identified, demonstrating the broad potential for DHIs in dermatology. Further research with a wider set of outcome parameters is needed to fully understand the potential of DHIs and ensure their sustainable implementation into dermatological care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jdv.19392

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reinders, P., Augustin, M., Kirsten, N., Fleyder, A., & Otten, M.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Reinders, Patrick
Venue
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-08-16
Volume
37
Issue
12
Pages
2440-2449
ISSN
  • 0926-9959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3083
OpenAlex
W4385477636
Cited by
19
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Novartis
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Keywords
digital health interventions, dermatology, teledermatology, store-and-forward telemedicine, artificial intelligence, skin cancer diagnosis, wound care, psoriasis, health behavior change, patient monitoring, diagnostic performance, technology acceptance, usability, research gaps
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Dermatology, Humans, Psoriasis, Skin Neoplasms, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review