Cited by 53Climate Change Policy and EconomicsGame Theory and Voting SystemsGame Theory and Applications

A MECHANISM DESIGN APPROACH TO CLIMATE-CHANGE AGREEMENTS

Martimort, David, Sand-Zantman, Wilfried·2016·Journal of the European Economic Association

Abstract

We take a mechanism design perspective to investigate how environmental agreements should account for multilateral externalities, incentive compatibility, and voluntary participation by sovereign countries. The optimal mechanism involves a tradeoff between a free rider problem in the effort provision of participating countries and the necessity of inducing countries to ratify the agreement. This mechanism can be approximated by a simple menu with attractive implementation and robustness properties. Limits on enforcement and commitment might nevertheless hinder the performance of this menu, making the “business as usual” scenario more likely.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jeea.12150

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combined with mechanism design, such approaches can be used to design methods for cooperation that lead to mutually beneficial outcomes, for example when formalizing procedures around international climate agreements.

    “Combined with mechanism design, 30 such approaches can be used to design methods for cooperation that lead to mutually beneficial outcomes, for example when formalizing procedures around international climate agreements [522,641].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [522]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martimort, D., & Sand-Zantman, W.
Affiliations
  • Paris School of Economics (FR)
  • Toulouse School of Economics ESSEC Business School
Venue
Journal of the European Economic Association
Published
2015-09-15
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
669-718
ISSN
1542-4766 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1922379506
Cited by
53
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the European Economic Association (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
Keywords
mechanism design, climate agreements, international climate policy, cooperative game theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review