Cited by 142Phytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesAgricultural and Biological ResearchFood and Agricultural Sciences

Optimization of Antioxidant Compounds Extraction from Fruit By-Products: Apple Pomace, Orange and Banana Peel: Optimization of Bioactive Compounds from By-Product

Open access
Hernández-Carranza, P., Ávila-Sosa, R., Guerrero-Beltrán, J.A., Navarro-Cruz, A.R., Corona-Jiménez, E., Ochoa-Velasco, C.E.·2016·Journal of Food Processing and Preservation

Abstract

The aim of this research was to optimize, by response surface methodology, antioxidant compounds extraction from apple pomace, orange and banana peel. The extracts were obtained at different temperatures and times. All by-products show a good content of vitamin C (12–102 mg of ascorbic acid/100 g dw), flavonoids (455–756 mg of catechin/100 g dw), phenolic compounds (227–689 mg of gallic acid equivalent/100 g dw), antioxidant capacity by 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH; 454–1,040 mg of Trolox/100 g dw) and ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP; 4–32 mM Fe2+/100 g dw) assays. Polynomial models obtained from each by-product showed a good fitting (0.81–0.97). Temperatures of 41–60C promote the major extraction of bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity from apple pomace. In orange peel, the optimum condition for vitamin C extraction was 20C (0.5 h); flavonoids, total phenols and antioxidant capacity (DPPH) were mostly extracted at 60C. In banana peel, the optimization indicates that major flavonoid concentration and antioxidant capacity (DPPH and FRAP assays) were at 60C (0.5 h). Practical Applications By-products are a good source of bioactive compounds that could be used to obtain products with added value; in this sense, the optimization of extraction of bioactive compounds with antioxidant capacity may be an important step in order to obtain the major concentration of antioxidant compounds with the less use of energy and cost. Therefore, the information presented in this study may be a good tool to apply in the industrial extraction of bioactive compounds from apple pomace, orange and banana peel.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jfpp.12588

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Banana peels contain 5-47 mg gallic acid equivalent/g dry matter (mg GAE/g DM) phenolics, which is 1.5-3 times more than in the flesh.

    “Banana peels contain 5-47 mg gallic acid equivalent/g dry matter (mg GAE/g DM) phenolics [98,99], which is 1.5-3 times more than in the flesh [100].”

    From Potential Valorization of Banana Production Waste in Developing Countries: Bio-Engineering Aspects (2024) · cites this paper as [99]

    The Optimization of Bioactive Compound Extraction from By-Products section reports banana-peel phenolics of 304–500 mg GAE/100 g dry weight, or 3.04–5 mg GAE/g. It supports the presence of phenolics but not the attributed 5–47 mg GAE/g range. The peel-versus-flesh ratio is attached to a different citation [100], so it is not assessed against this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. OCHOA-VELASCO, C.E., VALADEZ-BLANCO, R., SALAS-CORONADO, R., SUSTAITA-RIVERA, F., HERNÁNDEZ-CARLOS, B., GARCÍA-ORTEGA, S. and SANTOS-SÁNCHEZ, N.F. 2014. Evaluation of nitrogen content and plant grown promotion rhizobacteria in the bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cultivated in greenhouse. Proceedings 6° Food Science Biotechnology Safety, October 8-10, Monterrey NL, Mexico.
  2. SEYMOUR, G.B. 1993. Biochemistry in Fruit Ripening, pp. 95-98, Chapman and Hall, London.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hernández-Carranza, P., Ávila-Sosa, R., Guerrero-Beltrán, J. A., Navarro-Cruz, A. R., Corona-Jiménez, E., & Ochoa-Velasco, C. E.
Affiliations
  • Ingeniería en Alimentos, Facultad de Ingeniería Química, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, 14 Sur y Av. San Claudio; Ciudad Universitaria; Col. San Manuel 72420 Puebla Puebla México
  • Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (MX)
  • Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Alimentos y Ambiental; Universidad de las Américas Puebla; Calle Ex Hacienda s/n; Santa Catarina Mártir; Cholula Puebla 72810 México
  • Departamento de Bioquímica-Alimentos, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas; Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla; 14 Sur y Av. San Claudio, Ciudad Universitaria, Col. San Manuel Puebla Puebla 72420 México
Venue
Journal of Food Processing and Preservation
Published
2015-10-07
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
103-115
ISSN
0145-8892 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1911930177
Cited by
142
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Food Processing and Preservation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
fruit by-products, apple pomace, orange peel, banana peel, antioxidants, extraction optimization, extraction temperature, extraction time, vitamin C, flavonoids, phenolic compounds, DPPH radical scavenging, FRAP, bioactive compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review