The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explaining differences in flood management approaches in Europe and in the USA – a comparative analysis
Open accessAbstract
Flood risk management in Europe and worldwide is not static but constantly in a state of flux. There has been a trend towards more integrated flood risk management in many countries. However, the initial situation and the pace and direction of change is very different in the various countries. In this paper, we will present a conceptual framework that seeks to explain why countries opt for different flood risk management portfolios. The developed framework utilises insights from a range of policy science concepts in an integrated way and considers, among others, factors such as geographical characteristics, the experience with flood disasters, as well as human behavioural aspects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The lack of inter-basin cooperation in the Global South is especially acute in relation to flood risk governance [74,75].”
From Urban Stream and Wetland Restoration in the Global South—A DPSIR Analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [74]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
North, D. C. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808678 · Cited by 32,691
Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies
Perry, J. L., & Kingdon, J. W. (1985) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3323801 · Cited by 11,238
Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination
Haas, P. M. (1992) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300001442 · Cited by 7,894
Griggs, D., & Noguer, M. (2002) · Weather · doi:10.1256/004316502320517344 · Cited by 5,801
Theories Of The Policy Process
Weible, C. M. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003308201 · Cited by 2,319
The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe
Sabatier, P. (1998) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501768880000051 · Cited by 1,564
Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change
Stéphane Hallegatte, A. (2009) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.12.003 · Cited by 1,468
An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems
Easton, D. (1957) · World Politics · doi:10.2307/2008920 · Cited by 742
Burby, R. J. (2006) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716205284676 · Cited by 736
Hallegatte, S. (2008) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01046.x · Cited by 717
An introduction to the policy process: theories, concepts, and models of public policy making
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-1216 · Cited by 670
Flood maps in Europe – methods, availability and use
de Moel, H., van Alphen, J., & Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2009) · Natural hazards and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-9-289-2009 · Cited by 541
Cities and Flooding: A Guide to Integrated Urban Flood Risk Management for the 21st Century
Jha, A. K., Bloch, R., & Lamond, J. E. (2012) · Cited by 480
A System Analysis of Political Life
Prakash, A. (2015) · Cited by 469
Kwadijk, J., Haasnoot, M., MULDER, J. P. M., et al. (2010) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.64 · Cited by 444
Flood risk perception in lands “protected” by 100-year levees
Ludy, J., & Kondolf, G. M. (2012) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-011-0072-6 · Cited by 322
Flood insurance and floodplain management: the US experience
Burby, R. J. (2001) · Environmental Hazards · doi:10.1016/s1464-2867(02)00003-7 · Cited by 252
Meijerink, S. V. (2005) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501760500270745 · Cited by 237
Resilience strategies for flood risk management in the Netherlands
Vis, M., Klijn, F., de Bruijn, K., & van Buuren, M. (2003) · International Journal of River Basin Management · doi:10.1080/15715124.2003.9635190 · Cited by 227
Self-citationInsurability and Mitigation of Flood Losses in Private Households in Germany
Thieken, A. H., Petrow, T., Kreibich, H., et al. (2006) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00741.x · Cited by 225
Self-citationFloods as Catalysts for Policy Change: Historical Lessons from England and Wales
Johnson, C. L., Tunstall, S. M., & Penning‐Rowsell, E. C. (2005) · International Journal of Water Resources Development · doi:10.1080/07900620500258133 · Cited by 222
Self-citationChanges in future flood risk due to climate and development in a Dutch polder area
Bouwer, L. M., Bubeck, P., & Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2010) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.002 · Cited by 217
Self-citationPenning‐Rowsell, E. C., Johnson, C., & Tunstall, S. M. (2006) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.01.006 · Cited by 208
Self-citationDevelopment of flood exposure in the Netherlands during the 20th and 21st century
de Moel, H., Aerts, J. C. J. H., & Koomen, E. (2011) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.12.005 · Cited by 202
Future flood risk estimates along the river Rhine
Linde, A., Bubeck, P., Dekkers, J. E. C., de Moel, H., & Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2011) · Natural hazards and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-11-459-2011 · Cited by 185
Self-citationRecent changes in flood preparedness of private households and businesses in Germany
Kreibich, H., Seifert, I., Thieken, A. H., Lindquist, E., Wagner, K., & Merz, B. (2010) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-010-0119-3 · Cited by 184
Self-citationBubeck, P., Botzen, W. J. W., Kreibich, H., et al. (2012) · Natural hazards and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-12-3507-2012 · Cited by 175
Self-citationKlijn, F., Samuels, P., & van Os, A. G. (2008) · International Journal of River Basin Management · doi:10.1080/15715124.2008.9635358 · Cited by 152
Self-citationVictim pressure, institutional inertia and climate change adaptation: The case of flood risk
Harries, T., & Penning‐Rowsell, E. C. (2010) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.002 · Cited by 149
Self-citationImprovements on Flood Alleviation in Germany: Lessons Learned from the Elbe Flood in August 2002
Petrow, T., Thieken, A. H., Kreibich, H., et al. (2006) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-005-6291-4 · Cited by 113
Self-citationKlijn, F., van Buuren, M., & van Rooij, S. A. M. (2004) · AMBIO · doi:10.1579/0044-7447-33.3.141 · Cited by 110
Self-citationAerts, J. C. J. H., & Botzen, W. J. W. (2011) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06074.x · Cited by 103
Self-citationAssessment of the Netherlands’ Flood Risk Management Policy Under Global Change
Klijn, F., de Bruijn, K., Knoop, J. M., et al. (2011) · AMBIO · doi:10.1007/s13280-011-0193-x · Cited by 76
Self-citationThe evolution of UK flood insurance: incremental change over six decades
Penning‐Rowsell, E. C., Priest, S. J., & Johnson, C. (2014) · International Journal of Water Resources Development · doi:10.1080/07900627.2014.903166 · Cited by 52
Self-citationvan den Hurk, M., Mastenbroek, E., & Meijerink, S. V. (2013) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.017 · Cited by 30
Transboundary flood management in the Rhine basin: challenges for improved cooperation
Becker, G., Aerts, J. C. J. H., & Huitema, D. (2007) · Water Science & Technology · doi:10.2166/wst.2007.544 · Cited by 26
Compartmentalisation: flood consequence reduction by splitting up large polder areas
Klijn, F., Asselman, N. E. M., & van der Most, H. (2009) · Journal of Flood Risk Management · doi:10.1111/j.1753-318x.2009.01047.x · Cited by 23
Self-citationUnderstanding and Managing Water Policy Transitions: A Policy Science Perspective
Meijerink, S. V., & Huitema, D. (2009) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781849803366.00011 · Cited by 20
The distributional consequences of future flood risk management in England and Wales
Penning‐Rowsell, E. C., & Pardoe, J. (2014) · Environment and Planning C Government and Policy · doi:10.1068/c13241 · Cited by 20
Self-citationEditorial Note "A case of plagiarism"
Guzzetti, F. (2009) · Natural hazards and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-9-1-2009 · Cited by 19
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Baumgartner F.R., 2002, Policy dynamics
- Department for Communities and Local Government, 2010, Planning policy statement 25: development and flood risk
- European Union, 2007, DIRECTIVE 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks
- Federal Environment Agency, 2010, Water resource management in Germany
- Grin J., 2007, Handbook of public policy analysis: theory, politics, and methods, 201
- ICPR, 2008, The Rhine: a river and its relations
- Kind J., 2011, Societal cost benefit analysis water safety 21st century. Deltares report 1204144‐006
- Sabatier P.A., 1999, Theories of the policy process, 117
- Safecoast, 2008, Coastal flood risk and trends for the future in the North Sea region: synthesis report
- Zahariadis N., 1999, Theories of the policy process, 73
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Urban Stream and Wetland Restoration in the Global South—A DPSIR Analysis
Wantzen, K., Alves, C., Badiane, S., Bala, R., Blettler, M., Callisto, M., Cao, Y., Kolb, M., Kondolf, G., Leite, M., et al. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11184975 · Cited by 135
“The lack of inter-basin cooperation in the Global South is especially acute in relation to flood risk governance [74,75].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Bubeck, P., Kreibich, H., Penning‐Rowsell, E. C., Botzen, W. J. W., de Moel, H., & Klijn, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Potsdam (DE)
- GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE)
- Middlesex University London (GB)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Institute for Environmental Studies VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Deltares (NL)
- Venue
- Journal of Flood Risk Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-04-28
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 436-445
- ISSN
- 1753-318X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1938636163
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 10.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Flood Risk Management (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) (submittedVersion)
- publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Flood Risk Assessment and Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Integrated Water Resources Management
- Keywords
- flood risk management, integrated flood risk management, comparative policy analysis, policy science, conceptual framework, human behavior, geographical characteristics, Europe
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
