The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explaining differences in flood management approaches in Europe and in the USA – a comparative analysis
Open accessAbstract
Flood risk management in Europe and worldwide is not static but constantly in a state of flux. There has been a trend towards more integrated flood risk management in many countries. However, the initial situation and the pace and direction of change is very different in the various countries. In this paper, we will present a conceptual framework that seeks to explain why countries opt for different flood risk management portfolios. The developed framework utilises insights from a range of policy science concepts in an integrated way and considers, among others, factors such as geographical characteristics, the experience with flood disasters, as well as human behavioural aspects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The lack of inter-basin cooperation in the Global South is especially acute in relation to flood risk governance [74,75].”
From Urban Stream and Wetland Restoration in the Global South—A DPSIR Analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [74]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
North, D. C. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808678 · Cited by 32,691
Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies
Perry, J. L., & Kingdon, J. W. (1985) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3323801 · Cited by 11,238
Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination
Haas, P. M. (1992) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300001442 · Cited by 7,894
Griggs, D., & Noguer, M. (2002) · Weather · doi:10.1256/004316502320517344 · Cited by 5,801
Theories Of The Policy Process
Weible, C. M. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003308201 · Cited by 2,319
The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe
Sabatier, P. (1998) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501768880000051 · Cited by 1,564
Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change
Stéphane Hallegatte, A. (2009) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.12.003 · Cited by 1,468
An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems
Easton, D. (1957) · World Politics · doi:10.2307/2008920 · Cited by 742
Burby, R. J. (2006) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716205284676 · Cited by 736
Hallegatte, S. (2008) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01046.x · Cited by 717
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Baumgartner F.R., 2002, Policy dynamics
- Department for Communities and Local Government, 2010, Planning policy statement 25: development and flood risk
- European Union, 2007, DIRECTIVE 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks
- Federal Environment Agency, 2010, Water resource management in Germany
- Grin J., 2007, Handbook of public policy analysis: theory, politics, and methods, 201
- ICPR, 2008, The Rhine: a river and its relations
- Kind J., 2011, Societal cost benefit analysis water safety 21st century. Deltares report 1204144‐006
- Sabatier P.A., 1999, Theories of the policy process, 117
- Safecoast, 2008, Coastal flood risk and trends for the future in the North Sea region: synthesis report
- Zahariadis N., 1999, Theories of the policy process, 73
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Urban Stream and Wetland Restoration in the Global South—A DPSIR Analysis
Wantzen, K., Alves, C., Badiane, S., Bala, R., Blettler, M., Callisto, M., Cao, Y., Kolb, M., Kondolf, G., Leite, M., et al. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11184975 · Cited by 135
“The lack of inter-basin cooperation in the Global South is especially acute in relation to flood risk governance [74,75].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Bubeck, P., Kreibich, H., Penning‐Rowsell, E. C., Botzen, W. J. W., de Moel, H., & Klijn, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Potsdam (DE)
- GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE)
- Middlesex University London (GB)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Institute for Environmental Studies VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Deltares (NL)
- Venue
- Journal of Flood Risk Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-04-28
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 436-445
- ISSN
- 1753-318X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1938636163
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 10.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Flood Risk Management (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) (submittedVersion)
- publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Flood Risk Assessment and Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Integrated Water Resources Management
- Keywords
- flood risk management, integrated flood risk management, comparative policy analysis, policy science, conceptual framework, human behavior, geographical characteristics, Europe
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
