The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effectiveness of Acute Geriatric Unit Care Using Acute Care for Elders Components: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of acute geriatric unit care, based on all or part of the Acute Care for Elders ( ACE ) model and introduced in the acute phase of illness or injury, with that of usual care. Design: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of 13 randomized controlled and quasi‐experimental trials with parallel comparison groups retrieved from multiple sources. Setting: Acute care geriatric and nongeriatric hospital units. Participants: Acutely ill or injured adults (N = 6,839) with an average age of 81. Interventions: Acute geriatric unit care characterized by one or more ACE components: patient‐centered care, frequent medical review, early rehabilitation, early discharge planning, prepared environment. Measurements: Falls, pressure ulcers, delirium, functional decline at discharge from baseline 2‐week prehospital and hospital admission statuses, length of hospital stay, discharge destination (home or nursing home), mortality, costs, and hospital readmissions. Results: Acute geriatric unit care was associated with fewer falls (risk ratio ( RR ) = 0.51, 95% confidence interval ( CI ) = 0.29–0.88), less delirium ( RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.61–0.88), less functional decline at discharge from baseline 2‐week prehospital admission status ( RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.78–0.97), shorter length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference ( WMD ) = −0.61, 95% CI = −1.16 to −0.05), fewer discharges to a nursing home ( RR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.68–0.99), lower costs ( WMD = −$245.80, 95% CI = −$446.23 to −$45.38), and more discharges to home ( RR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.01–1.10). A nonsignificant trend toward fewer pressure ulcers was observed. No differences were found in functional decline between baseline hospital admission status and discharge, mortality, or hospital readmissions. Conclusion: Acute geriatric unit care, based on all or part of the ACE model and introduced during the acute phase of older adults' illness or injury, improves patient‐ and system‐level outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews
Lau, J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Schmid, C. H. (1997) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-127-9-199711010-00008 · Cited by 2,517 · cited 1×
“10 was considered statistically significant for heterogeneity.(23) Degree of heterogeneity is reported according to the I(2) statistic, which refers to the degree of variation between studies.”
BackgroundCovinsky, K. E., Palmer, R. M., Fortinsky, R. H., Counsell, S. R., Stewart, A. L., Kresevic, D., Burant, C. J., & Landefeld, C. S. (2003) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51152.x · Cited by 1,670
Landefeld, C. S., Palmer, R. M., Kresevic, D. M., Fortinsky, R. H., & Kowal, J. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199505183322006 · Cited by 824
Reuben, D. B., Inouye, S. K., Bogardus, S. T., Baker, D. I., Leo‐Summers, L., & Cooney, L. M. (2000) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03885.x · Cited by 802
Prevalence and Outcomes of Low Mobility in Hospitalized Older Patients
Brown, C. J., Friedkin, R. J., & Inouye, S. K. (2004) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52354.x · Cited by 656
National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2007 summary.
Hall, M. J., DeFrances, C. J., Williams, S. N., Golosinskiy, A., & Schwartzman, A. (2010) · PubMed · Cited by 626
Cited by
Frailty status at admission to hospital predicts multiple adverse outcomes
Hubbard, R. E., Peel, N. M., Samanta, M., Gray, L. C., Mitnitski, A., & Rockwood, K. (2017) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afx081 · Cited by 265
Geyskens, L., Jeuris, A., Deschodt, M., Van Grootven, B., Gielen, E., & Flamaing, J. (2022) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afac007 · Cited by 70
Association of the Trauma of Hospitalization With 30-Day Readmission or Emergency Department Visit
Rawal, S., Kwan, J. L., Razak, F., Detsky, A. S., Guo, Y., Lapointe-Shaw, L., Tang, T., Weinerman, A., Laupacis, A., Subramanian, S. V., et al. (2019) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5100 · Cited by 55
Changing hospital care for older adults: the case for geriatric hospitals in the United States
Flaherty, J. H., Rodin, M. B., & Morley, J. E. (2022) · Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine · doi:10.1177/23337214221109005 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Fox, M. T., Persaud, M., Maimets, I., O'Brien, K., Brooks, D., Tregunno, D., & Schraa, E.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-11-23
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2237-2245
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W2024820308
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 4.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effectiveness of Acute Geriatric Unit Care Using Acute Care for Elders Components: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jgs.12028
- The paper
- Fox, M. T., Persaud, M., Maimets, I., O'Brien, K., Brooks, D., Tregunno, D., & Schraa, E. (2012). Effectiveness of Acute Geriatric Unit Care Using Acute Care for Elders Components: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12028
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.