Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 656

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence and Outcomes of Low Mobility in Hospitalized Older Patients

Brown, Cynthia J., Friedkin, Rebecca J., Inouye, Sharon K.·2004·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of different levels of mobility in a hospitalized older cohort, to measure the degree and rate of adverse outcomes associated with different mobility levels, and to examine the physician activity orders and documented reasons for bedrest in the lowest mobility group. Design: A prospective cohort study. Setting: An 800‐bed university teaching hospital. Participants: Four hundred ninety‐eight hospitalized medical patients, aged 70 and older. Measurements: Using average mobility level, scored from 0 to 12, the low‐mobility group was defined as having a score of 4 or less, intermediate as a score of higher than 4 to 8, and high as higher than 8. Outcomes were functional decline, new institutionalization, death, and death or new institutionalization. Results: Low and intermediate levels of mobility were common, accounting for 80 (16%) and 157 (32%) study patients, respectively. Overall, any activity of daily living (ADL) decline occurred in 29%, new institutionalization in 13%, death in 7%, and death or new institutionalization in 22% of patients in this cohort. When compared with the high mobility group, the low and intermediate groups were associated with the adverse outcomes in a graded fashion, even after controlling for multiple confounders. The low‐mobility group had an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 5.6 (95% confidence interval (CI)=2.9–11.0) for ADL decline, 6.0 (95% CI=2.5–14.8) for new institutionalization, 34.3 (95% CI=6.3–185.9) for death, and 7.2 (95% CI=3.6–14.4) for death or new institutionalization. The intermediate group had adjusted ORs of 2.5 (95% CI=1.5–4.1), 2.9 (95% CI=1.4–6.0), 10.1 (95% CI=1.9–52.9), and 3.3 (95% CI=1.8–5.9) for ADL decline, new institutionalization, death, and death or new institutionalization, respectively. Bedrest was ordered at some point during hospitalization in 165 (33%) patients. For most patients, mobility was limited involuntarily (bedrest orders), and almost 60% of bedrest episodes in the lowest mobility group had no documented medical indication. Conclusion: Low mobility and bedrest are common in hospitalized older patients and are important predictors of adverse outcomes. This study demonstrated that the adverse outcomes associated with low mobility and bedrest may be viewed as iatrogenic events leading to complications, such as functional decline.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52354.x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 656

Metadata

Authors
Brown, C. J., Friedkin, R. J., & Inouye, S. K.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-07-19
Volume
52
Issue
8
Pages
1263-1270
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1596285328
Cited by
656
References
25
FWCI
7.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and Outcomes of Low Mobility in Hospitalized Older Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52354.x
The paper
Brown, C. J., Friedkin, R. J., & Inouye, S. K. (2004). Prevalence and Outcomes of Low Mobility in Hospitalized Older Patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52354.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.