Cited by 205Intensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersEmergency and Acute Care StudiesSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Delirium Risk Prediction, Healthcare Use and Mortality of Elderly Adults in the Emergency Department

Open access
Kennedy, Maura, Enander, Richard A., Tadiri, Sarah P., Wolfe, Richard E., Shapiro, Nathan I., Marcantonio, Edward R.·2014·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: To create a risk prediction rule for delirium in elderly adults in the emergency department ( ED ) and to compare mortality and resource use of elderly adults in the ED with and without delirium. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Urban tertiary care ED . Participants: Individuals aged 65 and older presenting for ED care ( N = 700). Measurements: A trained research assistant performed a structured mental status assessment and attention tests, after which delirium was determined using the C onfusion A ssessment M ethod. Data were collected on participant demographics, comorbidities, medications, ED course, hospital and intensive care unit ( ICU ) admission, length of stay, hospital charges, 30‐day rehospitalization, and mortality. Results: Nine percent of elderly study participants had delirium. Using logistic regression, a delirium prediction rule consisting of older age, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, dementia, suspected infection, and acute intracranial hemorrhage was created had good predictive accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.77). Admitted participants with ED delirium had longer median lengths of stay (4 vs 2 days) and were more likely to require ICU admission (13% vs 6%) and to be discharged to a new long‐term care facility (37% vs 9%) than those without. In all participants, ED delirium was associated with higher 30‐day mortality (6% vs 1%) and 30‐day readmission (27% vs 13%). Conclusion: This risk prediction rule may help identify a group of individuals in the ED at high risk of developing delirium who should undergo screening, but it requires external validation. Identification of delirium in the ED may enable physicians to implement strategies to decrease delirium duration and avoid inappropriate discharge of individuals with acute delirium, improving outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.12692

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kennedy, M., Enander, R. A., Tadiri, S. P., Wolfe, R. E., Shapiro, N. I., & Marcantonio, E. R.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kennedy, Maura
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02-10
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
462-469
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1967487362
Cited by
205
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3
FWCI
10.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Aging GEMSSTAR (1R03AG040706-01)
  • John A. Hartford Foundation, Inc
  • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
  • National Institute on Aging (K24 AG035075)
  • National Institutes of Health (HL091757, GM076659, 5R01HL093234-02)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
delirium, older adults, emergency department, Confusion Assessment Method, 30-day mortality, hospital resource utilization, intensive care unit admission, length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission, stroke, dementia, infection, intracranial hemorrhage, delirium screening, long-term care discharge
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Delirium, Delivery of Health Care, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Massachusetts, Mental Status Schedule, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Geriatric Assessment, Incidence, Survival Rate, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review