Cited by 189Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Anticholinergic Risk Scales and Associations with Adverse Health Outcomes in Older People

Open access
Salahudeen, Mohammed Saji, Hilmer, Sarah N., Nishtala, Prasad S.·2015·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate whether anticholinergic burden scores from nine published anticholinergic scales are associated with adverse health outcomes, including hospital admissions, hospitalizations for falls, hospital length of stay ( LOS ), and more visits to general practitioners ( GP s). Design: Pharmacoepidemiological population‐based study. Setting: New Zealand. Participants: Population aged 65 and older (n = 537,387). Measurements: Data were analyzed for 537,387 individuals from the Pharmaceutical Claims Data Mart data set (2011). Anticholinergic medication exposure was calculated using nine published scales. Events information (2012) was extracted from the National Minimum Datasets using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision , codes. Predictors of hospital admissions, hospitalizations for falls, LOS , and GP visits were examined using regression models adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, comorbidities, and polypharmacy. Results: Prevalence of exposure to anticholinergic medicines ranged from 22.8% to 55.9% according to the different scales. Multivariate regression analysis showed that anticholinergic burden scores quantified according to all nine scales were significantly associated with hospital admissions, hospitalizations for falls, LOS , and GP visits ( P < .001). The strongest predictors of these outcomes were the Drug Burden Index—Anticholinergic component scores, aged 85 and older, female sex, and polypharmacy. Conclusion: There are substantial differences in the estimation of anticholinergic burden exposure between the nine scales. Anticholinergic burden scores obtained from each of the scales were associated with adverse clinical outcomes of interest.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.13206

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is difficult to accurately assess the anticholinergic activity of each drug, and anticholinergic scales differ with respect to how they classify drugs.

    “It is difficult to accurately assess the anticholinergic activity of each drug, and anticholinergic scales differ with respect to how they classify drugs.29”
  • The anticholinergic effects of drugs are usually classified using scales developed by expert consensus aided by a literature review.

    “the anticholinergic effects of drugs are usually classified using scales developed by expert consensus aided by a literature review.29”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.1002/pds.1306 · DOI
  2. 10.2165/00002512-199303040-00004 · DOI
  3. 10.1176/ajp.149.10.1393 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01737.x · DOI
  5. 10.1136/bmj.38740.439664.DE · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.2217/1745509X.4.3.311 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1177/0091270006292126 · DOI
  8. 10.1136/jnnp.2009.186239 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02009.x · DOI
  10. 10.1001/archinternmed.2007.106 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1159/000325171 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0140-6736(81)90994-6 · DOI
  13. 10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.198 · DOI
  14. 10.1186/1471-2202-9-86 · DOI
  15. 10.1176/jnp.3.3.314 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/0091270009345690 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02411.x · DOI
  18. 10.1001/archinte.167.8.781 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/jhm.589 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04411.x · DOI
  21. 10.1007/s40266-012-0044-x · DOI
  22. 10.1177/014107680009300903 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/gerona/glt192 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03491.x · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1331/JAPhA.2013.12138 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/s40266-013-0111-y · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03411.x · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03386.x · DOI
  29. 10.1097/00005650-199508000-00004 · DOI
  30. 10.1371/journal.pone.0083224 · DOI
  31. 10.2165/11631420-000000000-00000 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.03.006 · DOI
  33. 10.2165/11585060-000000000-00000 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100303 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Tune LE, 2001, Anticholinergic effects of medication in elderly patients, J Clin Psychiatry, 62, 11
  36. 10.2165/00002512-199915010-00002 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/pds.3624 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/jgs.12632 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/gps.2157 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/gerona/gls176 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1007/s40266-013-0063-2 · DOI
  42. 10.1177/0269216309102528 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02377.x · DOI
  44. 10.1111/ggi.12000 · DOI
  45. 10.1177/0091270010368410 · DOI
  46. 10.3810/hp.2011.02.371 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2012.06.003 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.jamda.2008.11.005 · DOI
  49. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e7f2ab · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03676.x · DOI
  51. 10.1093/ageing/afr102 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.02.005 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1111/jgs.12093 · DOI
  54. 10.1371/journal.pone.0064111 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.psym.2013.04.004 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.jagp.2013.01.012 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Salahudeen, M. S., Hilmer, S. N., & Nishtala, P. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
85-90
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2070961119
Cited by
189
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 8
FWCI
13.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Ministry of Health, New Zealand
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Keywords
anticholinergic burden, Anticholinergic Risk Scale, older adults, hospitalization, length of hospital stay, general practitioner visits, polypharmacy, Drug Burden Index, adverse health effects, anticholinergic agents
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, New Zealand, Risk Assessment, Cholinergic Antagonists, General Practitioners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review