Cited by 171Elder Abuse and NeglectDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchIntimate Partner and Family Violence

Abuse of people with dementia by family carers: representative cross sectional survey

Open access
Cooper, C., Selwood, A., Blanchard, M., Walker, Z., Blizard, R., Livingston, G.·2009·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of abusive behaviours by family carers of people with dementia. DESIGN: Representative cross sectional survey SETTING: Community mental health teams in Essex and London. PARTICIPANTS: 220 family carers of people newly referred to secondary psychiatric services with dementia who were living at home. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Psychological and physical abuse (revised modified conflict tactics scale). RESULTS: 115 (52%, 95% confidence interval 46% to 59%) carers reported some abusive behaviour and 74 (34%, 27% to 40%) reported important levels of abuse. Verbal abuse was most commonly reported. Only three (1.4%) carers reported occasional physical abuse. CONCLUSIONS: Abusive behaviour by family carers towards people with dementia is common, with a third reporting important levels of abuse and half some abusive behaviour. We found few cases of physical or frequent abuse, although those with the most abusive behaviour may have been reluctant to report it.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.b155

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooper, C., Selwood, A., Blanchard, M., Walker, Z., Blizard, R., & Livingston, G.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Cooper, C.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2009-01-22
Volume
338
Issue
jan22 2
Pages
b155-b155
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2133881134
Cited by
171
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
FWCI
41.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Society
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Keywords
dementia, family caregivers, abuse, psychological violence, physical abuse, verbal abuse, prevalence, underreporting, caregiver burden, community mental health services
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dementia, Elder Abuse, England, Family Relations, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prevalence, Caregivers, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review