Diagnosis and Disruption: Population‐Level Analysis Identifying Points of Care at Which Transitions Are Highest for People with Dementia and Factors That Contribute to Them
Abstract
Objectives: To examine transitions that individuals with dementia experience longitudinally and to identify points of care when transitions are highest and the factors that contribute to those transitions. Design: Population‐based 10‐year retrospective cohort study from 2000 to 2011. Setting: General community. Participants: All individuals aged 65 and older newly diagnosed with dementia in British Columbia, Canada. Measurements: The frequency and timing of transitions over 10 years, participant characteristics associated with greater number of transitions, and the influence of recommended dementia care and high‐quality primary care on number of transitions. Results: Individuals experience a spike in transitions during the year of diagnosis, driven primarily by hospitalizations, despite accounting for end of life or newly moving to a long‐term care facility ( LTCF ). This occurs regardless of survival time or care location. Regardless of survival time, individuals not in LTCF s experience a marked increase in hospitalizations in the year before and the year of death, often exceeding hospitalizations in the year of diagnosis. Receipt of recommended dementia care and receipt of high‐quality primary care were independently associated with fewer transitions across care settings. Conclusion: The spike in transitions in the year of diagnosis highlights a distressing period for individuals with dementia during which unwanted or unnecessary transitions might occur and suggests a useful target for interventions. There is an association between recommended dementia care and outcomes and evidence of the continued value of high‐quality primary care in a complex population at a critical point when gaps in continuity are especially likely.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies examining health service utilisation among persons with dementia have been inconsistent regarding the timing of healthcare utilisation increases, with some finding increases with time following diagnosis and others observing increases near the time of death.
“Previous studies examining health service utilisation among persons with dementia have been inconsistent regarding the timing of healthcare utilisation increases—with some finding that utilisation increases with time following diagnosis2 and others observing increases near the time of death.2 12 13 33”
From Trajectories of health system use and survival for community-dwelling persons with dementia: a cohort study (2020) · cites this paper as [13]
Cites
Transitions in Care for Older Adults with and without Dementia
Callahan, C. M., Arling, G., Tu, W., Rosenman, M. B., Counsell, S. R., Stump, T. E., & Hendrie, H. C. (2012) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03905.x · Cited by 253 · see citing works
The Transition From Home to Nursing Home Mortality Among People With Dementia
Aneshensel, C. S., Pearlin, L. I., Levy-Storms, L., & Schuler, R. H. (2000) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/55.3.s152 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Dementia care in the context of primary care reform: an integrative review
Spenceley, S. M., Sedgwick, N., & Keenan, J. (2015) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2014.920301 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Primary care continuity and potentially avoidable hospitalization in persons with dementia
Godard‐Sebillotte, C., Strumpf, E., Sourial, N., Rochette, L., Pelletier, E., & Vedel, I. (2021) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.17049 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Bronskill, S. E., Maclagan, L. C., Walker, J. D., Guan, J., Wang, X., Ng, R., Rochon, P. A., Yates, E. A., Vermeulen, M. J., & Maxwell, C. J. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037485 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Lei, L., Cai, S., Conwell, Y., Fortinsky, R. H., & Intrator, O. (2020) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000001386 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sivananthan, S. N., & McGrail, K. M.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Sivananthan, Saskia N.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 569-577
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W2299946728
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of British Columbia
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Keywords
- dementia, care transitions, hospitalization, long-term care, primary care quality, continuity of care, older adults, end of life
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, British Columbia, Dementia, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Long-Term Care, Male, Patient Transfer, Primary Health Care, Quality of Health Care, Retrospective Studies, Terminal Care, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review