Cited by 15Primary Care and Health OutcomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Can continuity of care reduce hospitalization among community-dwelling older adult veterans living with dementia?

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospitalization is a difficult experience, especially for patients with dementia. Understanding whether better continuity of care (COC) reduces hospitalizations can indicate interventions that might help curb hospitalizations. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the causal impact of COC on hospitalizations and different reasons for hospitalization among community-dwelling older veterans with dementia. RESEARCH DESIGN: Population-based observational study using nationwide Veterans Health Administration data linked to Medicare claims in Fiscal Years (FYs) 2014-2015. To account for unobserved confounders we used an instrumental variable for COC-whether veteran changed residence by more than 10 miles. SUBJECTS: Community-dwelling veterans with dementia aged 66 and older, enrolled in Traditional Medicare (n=105,528). MEASURES: Bice-Boxerman Continuity of Care (BBC) index (0-worst to 1-best COC); binary indicators of any hospitalization for all causes, for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) and for reasons grouped by major diagnostic category. RESULTS: The mean BBC in FY 2014 was 0.32 (SD, 0.23). In FY 2015 43.3% of the cohort veterans were hospitalized. A 0.1 higher BBC resulted in 2.4% (95% confidence interval, 0.5%-4.4%) lower probability of hospitalization for all causes. BBC was not associated with hospitalization for ACSCs. Grouped by major diagnostic category, a 0.1 higher BBC resulted in 3.8% (95% confidence interval, 2.1%-5.4%) lower probability of hospitalization for neuropsychiatric diseases/disorders, with no impact on hospitalizations for circulatory, respiratory, infectious, kidney and urinary, digestive, musculoskeletal, and endocrine-metabolic diseases/disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Among community-dwelling older veterans with dementia, better COC resulted in less hospitalizations, and this effect was primarily due to less hospitalization for neuropsychiatric diseases/disorders but not hospitalization for ACSCs, or other hospitalization reasons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001386

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lei, L., Cai, S., Conwell, Y., Fortinsky, R. H., & Intrator, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Lei, Lianlian
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2020-09-10
Volume
58
Issue
11
Pages
988-995
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3086282682
Cited by
15
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
continuity of care, hospitalization, dementia, older veterans, community-dwelling older adults, ambulatory care sensitive conditions, neuropsychiatric disorders, Medicare, Veterans Health Administration
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Continuity of Patient Care, Dementia, Female, Medicare, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, United States, Veterans, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review