Cited by 35Primary Care and Health OutcomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Dementia care in the context of primary care reform: an integrative review

Spenceley, Shannon M., Sedgwick, Noëlle, Keenan, Jessie·2015·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this review was to determine the influence of the growing body of evidence about the attributes of high-performing primary care systems on the literature related to the primary care of people living with dementia. METHODS: In this integrative review, we examined a broad range of published and grey literature (2000-2013) about the primary care of dementia, using a systematic approach set up in advance of the literature search. The review was guided by two questions: What are the evident models of primary care for dementia? How do the models line up with the other attributes of high-performing primary care? RESULTS: Three models were noted: carved-out, co-managed, and integrative-hub, all informed by different assumptions about the role of primary care in dementia. The models varied in alignment with the attributes of high-performing primary care, although we found very little attention to accessibility, relational continuity or comprehensiveness of care. CONCLUSIONS: We know what we need to pay attention to in building our primary care system - and no population will put the performance of primary care more to the test over the next two decades than the rapidly growing number of people who will be living with complex chronic conditions like dementia. Recent literature around primary care and dementia shows promise in attending to some of the attributes of high-performing primary care, yet much more work is needed if we are to truly leverage the potential value of primary care in addressing the needs of these complex and numerous future patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607863.2014.920301

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Primary healthcare plays a critical role in rural dementia care due to lack of specialists and the importance of care coordination post-diagnosis.

    “Primary healthcare plays a critical role in rural dementia care due to lack of specialists and the importance of care coordination post-diagnosis [24, 25], thus effective models of primary healthcare for dementia in rural settings are needed [26], along with strategies for translating these into practice and ensuring sustainability.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spenceley, S. M., Sedgwick, N., & Keenan, J.
Affiliations
University of Lethbridge (CA)
Corresponding author
Spenceley, Shannon M.
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2014-06-05
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
107-120
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W2076202220
Cited by
35
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
dementia care, primary care reform, primary care models, co-management, relational continuity, care accessibility, comprehensiveness of care, complex chronic conditions
MeSH terms
Dementia, Humans, Primary Health Care, Quality of Health Care, Models, Organizational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review