Cited by 103Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionFrailty in Older AdultsPhysical Activity and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Physical Activity versus Health Education on Physical Function, Grip Strength and Mobility

Open access

Abstract

Background: Physical activity ( PA ) reduces the rate of mobility disability, compared with health education ( HE ), in at risk older adults. It is important to understand aspects of performance contributing to this benefit. Objective: To evaluate intervention effects on tertiary physical performance outcomes. Design: The Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders ( LIFE ) was a multi‐centered, single‐blind randomized trial of older adults. Setting: Eight field centers throughout the United States. Participants: 1635 adults aged 78.9 ± 5.2 years, 67.2% women at risk for mobility disability (Short Physical Performance Battery [SPPB] <10). Interventions: Moderate PA including walking, resistance and balance training compared with HE consisting of topics relevant to older adults. Outcomes: Grip strength, SPPB score and its components (balance, 4 m gait speed, and chair‐stands), as well as 400 m walking speed. Results: Total SPPB score was higher in PA versus HE across all follow‐up times (overall P = .04) as was the chair‐stand component (overall P < .001). No intervention effects were observed for balance (overall P = .12), 4 m gait speed (overall P = .78), or grip strength (overall P = .62). However, 400 m walking speed was faster in PA versus HE group (overall P =<.001). In separate models, 29% of the rate reduction of major mobility disability in the PA versus HE group was explained by change in SPPB score, while 39% was explained by change in the chair stand component. Conclusion: Lower extremity performance ( SPPB ) was significantly higher in the PA compared with HE group. Changes in chair‐stand score explained a considerable portion of the effect of PA on the reduction of major mobility disability–consistent with the idea that preserving muscle strength/power may be important for the prevention of major mobility disability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.14804

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1001/jama.1989.03420180087036 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 103

Metadata

Authors
Santanasto, A. J., Glynn, N. W., Lovato, L. C., Blair, S. N., Fielding, R. A., Gill, T. M., Guralnik, J. M., Hsu, F., King, A. C., Strotmeyer, E. S., Manini, T. M., Marsh, A. P., McDermott, M. M., Goodpaster, B. H., Pahor, M., Newman, A. B., & the LIFE Study Group
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Wake Forest University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Translational Research Institute for Metabolism and Diabetes (US)
Corresponding author
Newman, Anne B.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-21
Volume
65
Issue
7
Pages
1427-1433
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2589461526
Cited by
103
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 4
FWCI
39.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (58‐1950‐0‐014)
  • National Institute on Aging (K07AG3587)
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
physical activity, health education, older adults, mobility impairment, physical function, grip strength, Short Physical Performance Battery, walking speed, balance, resistance training, balance training, muscle strength
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Health Education, Humans, Life Style, Male, United States, Exercise, Geriatric Assessment, Single-Blind Method, Walking, Hand Strength, Lower Extremity, Mobility Limitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review