Cited by 34Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

Medical Comorbidities of Dementia: Links to Caregivers' Emotional Difficulties and Gains

Open access
Polenick, Courtney A., Min, Lillian, Kales, Helen C.·2020·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate how eight major medical comorbidities of dementia (arthritis, cancer, diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, lung disease, osteoporosis, and stroke) are associated with caregivers' perceptions of emotional caregiving difficulties and caregiving gains (ie, benefits or rewards from the care role). DESIGN: Nationally representative cross‐sectional surveys of community‐dwelling persons living with dementia (PLWDs) and their co‐resident family caregivers in the United States. SETTING: The 2011 National Health and Aging Trends Study and National Study of Caregiving. PARTICIPANTS: Total of 356 co‐resident family caregivers of community‐dwelling PLWDs. MEASUREMENTS: Caregivers' sociodemographic and health characteristics, caregiving stressors, emotional caregiving difficulties, caregiving gains, and chronic health conditions of PLWDs. RESULTS: Caregivers most commonly cared for a PLWD with arthritis (65.5%), followed by hypertension (64.9%), diabetes (30.1%), stroke (28.8%), osteoporosis (27.1%), heart disease (23.3%), cancer (21.5%), and lung disease (17.2%). Logistic regressions revealed that caregivers were 2.63 and 2.32 times more likely to report higher than median emotional caregiving difficulties when PLWDs had diagnoses of diabetes and osteoporosis, respectively, controlling for caregiver sex, relationship to the PLWD (spouse vs non‐spouse), educational attainment, self‐rated health, and assistance with activities of daily living and medical care activities. Caregivers were also 2.10 times more likely to report lower than median caregiving gains when PLWDs had a diagnosis of osteoporosis. CONCLUSION: Comorbid health conditions among PLWDs have distinct implications for caregiving outcomes. Clinical care and interventions to improve the well‐being of both care dyad members should support caregivers in managing medical comorbidities of dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:609–613, 2020

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.16244

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Caregivers of people with dementia who had a diagnosis of diabetes or osteoporosis were 2.6 and 2.3 times more likely, respectively, to report emotional difficulties with care compared with caregivers of people with dementia who did not have these co-occurring conditions.

    “a national study found that caregivers of people with dementia who had a diagnosis of diabetes or osteoporosis were 2.6 and 2.3 times more likely, respectively, to report emotional difficulties with care compared with caregivers of people with dementia who did not have these co‐occurring conditions. 525”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [525]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Polenick, C. A., Min, L., & Kales, H. C.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Polenick, Courtney A.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-11-20
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
609-613
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2990585354
Cited by
33
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (K01AG059829, P30AG024824)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
dementia, comorbidities, family caregivers, osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus, arthritis, caregiver well-being
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dementia, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Comorbidity, Caregivers, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review