Cited by 22Nursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental IllnessIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

Health-related quality of life: a comparative analysis of caregivers of people with dementia, cancer, COPD/emphysema, and diabetes and noncaregivers, 2015–2018 BRFSS

Open access
Secinti, Ekin, Lewson, Ashley B, Wu, Wei, Kent, Erin E, Mosher, Catherine E·2021·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many informal caregivers experience significant caregiving burden and report worsening health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Caregiver HRQoL may vary by disease context, but this has rarely been studied. PURPOSE: Informed by the Model of Carer Stress and Burden, we compared HRQoL outcomes of prevalent groups of caregivers of people with chronic illness (i.e., dementia, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]/emphysema, and diabetes) and noncaregivers and examined whether caregiving intensity (e.g., duration and hours) was associated with caregiver HRQoL. METHODS: Using 2015-2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, we identified caregivers of people with dementia (n = 4,513), cancer (n = 3,701), COPD/emphysema (n = 1,718), and diabetes (n = 2,504) and noncaregivers (n = 176,749). Regression analyses were used to compare groups. RESULTS: Caregiver groups showed small, nonsignificant differences in HRQoL outcomes. Consistent with theory, all caregiver groups reported more mentally unhealthy days than noncaregivers (RRs = 1.29-1.61, ps < .001). Caregivers of people with cancer and COPD/emphysema reported more physically unhealthy days than noncaregivers (RRs = 1.17-1.24, ps < .01), and caregivers of people with diabetes reported a similar pattern (RR = 1.24, p = .01). However, general health and days of interference of poor health did not differ between caregivers and noncaregivers. Across caregiver groups, most caregiving intensity variables were unrelated to HRQoL outcomes; only greater caregiving hours were associated with more mentally unhealthy days (RR = 1.13, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that HRQoL decrements associated with caregiving do not vary substantially across chronic illness contexts and are largely unrelated to the perceived intensity of the caregiving. Findings support the development and implementation of strategies to optimize caregiver health across illness contexts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/abm/kaab007

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Schulz R, Tompkins CA. Informal caregivers in the United States: prevalence, caregiver characteristics, and ability to provide care. In: Olson S, ed. The Role of Human Factors in Home Health Care: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2010:117-145.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Secinti, E., Lewson, A. B., Wu, W., Kent, E. E., & Mosher, C. E.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology, Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis, North Blackford Street, LD, Indianapolis, IN, USA
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2021-03-24
Volume
55
Issue
11
Pages
1130-1143
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W3136238889
Cited by
22
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
health-related quality of life, informal caregivers, caregiver burden, chronic disease, dementia, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, diabetes mellitus, care intensity, mental health, physical health, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
MeSH terms
Dementia, Diabetes Mellitus, Emphysema, Humans, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Caregivers, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review