Can fortified foods and snacks increase the energy and protein intake of hospitalised older patients? A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Background: Undernutrition affects over 44% of hospitalised older people, who often dislike oral nutritional supplements (ONS). This review summarises the evidence for an alternative strategy, using energy and protein dense meals (via fortification) or snacks (supplementation) to increase the dietary energy and protein intake of older inpatients. Methods: A search was conducted through PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane database of systematic reviews (May 1996 to May 2016) that used fortification or supplementation to increase the energy or protein intake of patients (mean age ≥60 years) in hospitals or rehabilitation centres. Results: Ten articles (546 patients, mean age 60–83 years) were identified. Compared with usual nutritional care, six studies using either energy or protein based fortification and supplementation significantly increased intake of energy (250–450 kcal day −1 ) or protein (12–16 g day −1 ). Two studies enriched menus with both energy and protein, and significantly increased both energy (698 kcal day −1 and 21 kJ kg −1 ) and protein (16 g and 0.2 g kg −1 ) intake compared to usual care. ONS was similar to supplementation in one study but superior to fortification in another. Four studies reported good acceptability of enriched products and two studies that found they were cost‐effective. Conclusions: Compared with usual nutritional care, energy‐ and protein‐based fortification and supplementation could be employed as an effective, well‐tolerated and cost‐effective intervention to improve dietary intake amongst older inpatients. This strategy may be particularly useful for patients with cognitive impairment who struggle with ONS, and clinical trials are required to compare these approaches and establish their impact on functional outcomes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A hospital food service organization based on systematic between-meals snacks (three meals and three snacks: 7:30 am, 10 am, noon, 3 pm, 7 pm, 10 pm) reaches the objective of preventing nocturnal starving in people aged 70 or more.
“A hospital food service organization based on systematic between-meals snacks 620 (three meals and three snacks: 7:30 am, 10 am, noon, 3 pm, 7 pm, 10 pm) reaches this objective 621 [49, 50].”
From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [49]
The Introduction and Conclusions (page not available) support offering between-meal snacks to older inpatients to improve dietary intake. The review does not establish the specified three-meal, three-snack timetable, an age threshold of 70, or prevention of overnight fasting. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Reprint—Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & and the PRISMA Group (2009) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/89.9.873 · Cited by 2,486 · see citing works
Protein and energy supplementation in elderly people at risk from malnutrition
Milne, A. C., Potter, J., Vivanti, A., & Avenell, A. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003288.pub3 · Cited by 849 · see citing works
Effectiveness of food-based fortification in older people a systematic review and meta-analysis
Morilla-Herrera, J. C., Martín-Santos, F. J., Caro-Bautista, J., Saucedo-Figueredo, C., García-Mayor, S., & Morales-Asencio, J. M. (2016) · The Journal of nutrition, health and aging · doi:10.1007/s12603-015-0591-z · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Trabal, J., & Farran-Codina, A. (2015) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuv023 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Kubrak C & Jensen L (2007) Malnutrition in acute care patients: a narrative review. Int J Nurs Stud 44, 1036-1054.
- Bally MR, Blaser Yildirim PZ, Bounoure L et al. (2016) Nutritional support and outcomes in malnourished medical inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 176, 43-53.
- Cawood AL, Elia M & Stratton RJ (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of high protein oral nutritional supplements. Ageing Res Rev 11, 278-296.
- Nieuwenhuizen WF, Weenen H, Rigby P et al. (2010) Older adults and patients in need of nutritional support: review of current treatment options and factors influencing nutritional intake. Clin Nutr 29, 160-169.
- Donahue E, Crowe K & Lawrence J (2014) Increasing dietary protein provision among older adults using protein-enhanced soups 2014. Food & nutrition conference & expo, October 18-21, 2014, Atlanta, GA. J Acad Nutr Diet 114, A14.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition
Thibault, R., Abbasoglu, O., Ioannou, E., Meija, L., Ottens-Oussoren, K., Pichard, C., Rothenberg, E., Rubin, D., Siljamäki-Ojansuu, U., Vaillant, M.-F., et al. (2021) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2021.09.039 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
ESPEN guideline on nutritional support for polymorbid medical inpatients
Wunderle, C., Gomes, F., Schuetz, P., Stumpf, F., Austin, P., Ballesteros-Pomar, M. D., Cederholm, T., Fletcher, J., Laviano, A., Norman, K., et al. (2023) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2023.06.023 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
“According to these results, fortification and supplementation of common food items could be considered a costeffective, well tolerated and effective way of improving nutrient intake in older inpatients [151].”
Background
- Authors
- Mills, S. R., Wilcox, C. R., Ibrahim, K., & Roberts, H. C.
- Affiliations
- Southampton General Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Mills, S. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-01-10
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 379-389
- ISSN
- 0952-3871 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-277X
- OpenAlex
- W2783641767
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8
- FWCI
- 1.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
- University of Southampton
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
- Keywords
- fortified foods, protein supplementation, hospitalized older adults, malnutrition, energy intake, protein intake, oral nutritional supplements, acceptability, cost-effectiveness, cognitive impairment
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Energy Intake, Dietary Proteins, Female, Food, Fortified, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Dietary Supplements, Nutrition Therapy, Snacks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review