Cited by 68Nutrition and Health in AgingClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyDysphagia Assessment and Management

Can fortified foods and snacks increase the energy and protein intake of hospitalised older patients? A systematic review

Open access
Mills, S. R., Wilcox, C. R., Ibrahim, K., Roberts, H. C.·2018·Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

Background: Undernutrition affects over 44% of hospitalised older people, who often dislike oral nutritional supplements (ONS). This review summarises the evidence for an alternative strategy, using energy and protein dense meals (via fortification) or snacks (supplementation) to increase the dietary energy and protein intake of older inpatients. Methods: A search was conducted through PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane database of systematic reviews (May 1996 to May 2016) that used fortification or supplementation to increase the energy or protein intake of patients (mean age ≥60 years) in hospitals or rehabilitation centres. Results: Ten articles (546 patients, mean age 60–83 years) were identified. Compared with usual nutritional care, six studies using either energy or protein based fortification and supplementation significantly increased intake of energy (250–450 kcal day −1 ) or protein (12–16 g day −1 ). Two studies enriched menus with both energy and protein, and significantly increased both energy (698 kcal day −1 and 21 kJ kg −1 ) and protein (16 g and 0.2 g kg −1 ) intake compared to usual care. ONS was similar to supplementation in one study but superior to fortification in another. Four studies reported good acceptability of enriched products and two studies that found they were cost‐effective. Conclusions: Compared with usual nutritional care, energy‐ and protein‐based fortification and supplementation could be employed as an effective, well‐tolerated and cost‐effective intervention to improve dietary intake amongst older inpatients. This strategy may be particularly useful for patients with cognitive impairment who struggle with ONS, and clinical trials are required to compare these approaches and establish their impact on functional outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jhn.12529

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A hospital food service organization based on systematic between-meals snacks (three meals and three snacks: 7:30 am, 10 am, noon, 3 pm, 7 pm, 10 pm) reaches the objective of preventing nocturnal starving in people aged 70 or more.

    “A hospital food service organization based on systematic between-meals snacks 620 (three meals and three snacks: 7:30 am, 10 am, noon, 3 pm, 7 pm, 10 pm) reaches this objective 621 [49, 50].”

    From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [49]

    The Introduction and Conclusions (page not available) support offering between-meal snacks to older inpatients to improve dietary intake. The review does not establish the specified three-meal, three-snack timetable, an age threshold of 70, or prevention of overnight fasting. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Kubrak C & Jensen L (2007) Malnutrition in acute care patients: a narrative review. Int J Nurs Stud 44, 1036-1054.
  2. Bally MR, Blaser Yildirim PZ, Bounoure L et al. (2016) Nutritional support and outcomes in malnourished medical inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 176, 43-53.
  3. Cawood AL, Elia M & Stratton RJ (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of high protein oral nutritional supplements. Ageing Res Rev 11, 278-296.
  4. Nieuwenhuizen WF, Weenen H, Rigby P et al. (2010) Older adults and patients in need of nutritional support: review of current treatment options and factors influencing nutritional intake. Clin Nutr 29, 160-169.
  5. Donahue E, Crowe K & Lawrence J (2014) Increasing dietary protein provision among older adults using protein-enhanced soups 2014. Food & nutrition conference & expo, October 18-21, 2014, Atlanta, GA. J Acad Nutr Diet 114, A14.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mills, S. R., Wilcox, C. R., Ibrahim, K., & Roberts, H. C.
Affiliations
Southampton General Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Mills, S. R.
Venue
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-10
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
379-389
ISSN
  • 0952-3871 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-277X
OpenAlex
W2783641767
Cited by
68
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Southampton
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Keywords
fortified foods, protein supplementation, hospitalized older adults, malnutrition, energy intake, protein intake, oral nutritional supplements, acceptability, cost-effectiveness, cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Energy Intake, Dietary Proteins, Female, Food, Fortified, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Dietary Supplements, Nutrition Therapy, Snacks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review