Cited by 140

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Statistical tests for measures of colocalization in biological microscopy

MCDONALD, JOHN H., DUNN, KENNETH W.·2013·Journal of Microscopy

Abstract

Summary: Colocalization analysis is the most common technique used for quantitative analysis of fluorescence microscopy images. Several metrics have been developed for measuring the colocalization of two probes, including Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC) and Manders’ correlation coefficient (MCC). However, once measured, the meaning of these measurements can be unclear; interpreting PCC or MCC values requires the ability to evaluate the significance of a particular measurement, or the significance of the difference between two sets of measurements. In previous work, we showed how spatial autocorrelation confounds randomization techniques commonly used for statistical analysis of colocalization data. Here we use computer simulations of biological images to show that the Student's one‐sample t‐test can be used to test the significance of PCC or MCC measurements of colocalization, and the Student's two‐sample t‐test can be used to test the significance of the difference between measurements obtained under different experimental conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jmi.12093

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initial attempts to quantify colocalization by imaging in two or three dimensions followed by application of Pearson's or Manders' coefficients did not accurately reflect the degree of overlap observed, likely because of the significant degree of cytoplasmic EHD1 haze that interferes with the analysis.

    “did not accurately reflect the degree of overlap observed, likely because of the significant degree of cytoplasmic EHD1 haze that interferes with the analysis, especially in cells imaged without LRP1 internalization.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.1091/mbc.E05-08-0799 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2000.010205.x · DOI
  3. 10.2307/2532039 · DOI
  4. 10.1529/biophysj.103.038422 · DOI
  5. 10.1152/ajpcell.00462.2010 · DOI
  6. 10.2307/2532625 · DOI
  7. 10.1006/excr.1996.3460 · DOI
  8. Fisher R.A., 1915, Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples from an indefinitely large population, Biometrika, 10, 507
  9. 10.1080/11956860.2002.11682707 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.0805636105 · DOI
  11. 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2003.01239.x · DOI
  12. 10.3102/00346543066004579 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1993.tb03313.x · DOI
  14. McDonald J.H., 2009, Handbook of Biological Statistics
  15. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2010.03369.x · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00575.x · DOI
  17. Sokal R.R., 2012, Biometry
  18. 10.2307/2331746 · DOI
  19. Steensel B., 1996, Partial colocalization of glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors in discrete compartments in nuclei of rat hippocampus neurons, J. Cell Sci, 109, 787, 10.1242/jcs.109.4.787 · DOI
  20. Wang E.X, 2001, Brefeldin A rapidly disrupts plasma membrane polarity by blocking polar sorting in common endosomes of MDCK cells, J. Cell Sci, 114, 3309, 10.1242/jcs.114.18.3309 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
MCDONALD, J. H., & DUNN, K. W.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biological Sciences University of Delaware Newark Delaware U.S.A.
  • Department of Medicine Division of Nephrology Indiana University Medical Center Indianapolis Indiana U.S.A.
Venue
Journal of Microscopy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-10-10
Volume
252
Issue
3
Pages
295-302
ISSN
  • 0022-2720
  • 1365-2818
Cited by
140
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review