The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 23 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Sorting nexin 17 (SNX17) links endosomal sorting to Eps15 homology domain protein 1 (EHD1)–mediated fission machinery
Open accessAbstract
Following endocytosis, receptors that are internalized to sorting endosomes are sorted to different pathways, in part by sorting nexin (SNX) proteins. Notably, SNX17 interacts with a multitude of receptors in a sequence-specific manner to regulate their recycling. However, the mechanisms by which SNX17-labeled vesicles that contain sorted receptors bud and undergo vesicular fission from the sorting endosomes remain elusive. Recent studies suggest that a dynamin-homolog, Eps15 homology domain protein 1, catalyzes fission and releases endosome-derived vesicles for recycling to the plasma membrane. However, the mechanism by which EHD1 is coupled to various receptors and regulates their recycling remains unknown. Here we sought to characterize the mechanism by which EHD1 couples with SNX17 to regulate recycling of SNX17-interacting receptors. We hypothesized that SNX17 couples receptors to the EHD1 fission machinery in mammalian cells. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments and in vitro assays provided evidence that EHD1 and SNX17 directly interact. We also found that inducing internalization of a SNX17 cargo receptor, low-density lipoprotein receptor–related protein 1 (LRP1), led to recruitment of cytoplasmic EHD1 to endosomal membranes. Moreover, surface rendering and quantification of overlap volumes indicated that SNX17 and EHD1 partially colocalize on endosomes and that this overlap further increases upon LRP1 internalization. Additionally, SNX17-containing endosomes were larger in EHD1-depleted cells than in WT cells, suggesting that EHD1 depletion impairs SNX17-mediated endosomal fission. Our findings help clarify our current understanding of endocytic trafficking, providing significant additional insight into the process of endosomal fission and connecting the sorting and fission machineries.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This study identifies a direct interaction between the sorting nexin SNX17 and the dynamin-like ATPase EHD1, linking endosomal cargo sorting to the fission machinery. Internalization of the SNX17 cargo receptor LRP1 recruits EHD1 to endosomal membranes, and EHD1 depletion enlarges SNX17-containing endosomes, consistent with impaired fission.
Key findings
- EHD1 and SNX17 co-immunoprecipitate from HeLa lysates and interact directly in vitro: His-EHD1 pulled down GST-SNX17 at roughly the level of the 20% input, but no detectable GST alone.
- Binding maps to the SNX17 atypical FERM domain: both GST-FERM B and GST-FERM C were precipitated by His-EHD1, whereas the SNX17 PX domain was not; the SNX17 W321A mutation had no effect on EHD1 binding. The EHD1 EH domain was not required (His-EHD1 ΔEH pulled down similar GST-SNX17 levels as full-length; His–EH-1 showed decreased pulldown).
- LRP1 internalization recruited EHD1 to endosomes: mean ~300% increase in total surface volume of EHD1-containing endosomes per cell, while SNX17 showed only a modest mean ~20% recruitment. Surface overlap of SNX17 with EHD1 was ~20% at steady state and increased 2- to 3-fold upon LRP1 uptake.
- EHD1 recruitment was SNX17-independent (SNX17 siRNA knockdown did not prevent LRP1-induced EHD1 recruitment), but EHD1 knockout cells had larger SNX17-containing endosomes, with the size distribution shifted right, particularly above a 3 μm² threshold.
Methods
- Cell systems: HeLa cells for co-immunoprecipitation; CRISPR/Cas9 gene-edited NIH3T3 cells expressing endogenous EHD1-GFP and EHD1 knockout NIH3T3 cells; SNX17 knockdown by siRNA (Dharmacon SMARTpool, 48 h).
- Binding assays: purified recombinant GST-SNX17, GST-FERM B, GST-FERM C, GST-PX, GST-MICAL-L1 CH1, and His-EHD1, His-EHD1 ΔEH, His–EH-1, used in Ni²⁺-NTA pulldown/direct interaction assays with micrococcal nuclease treatment; densitometry from three experiments.
- Imaging/quantification: LRP1 antibody uptake (30 min on ice, then 30 min at 37 °C), confocal z-stacks (Zeiss LSM 800, ×63/1.4 NA), IMARIS 3D surface rendering plus Kiss and Run surface–surface overlap module; >30 cells from three independent experiments; two-tailed t tests and frequency distributions in GraphPad Prism.
Limitations
- Stated by the paper: it remains unclear whether SNX17 can simultaneously bind both receptors and EHD1; whether a weak EHD1–SNX27 interaction exists requires MS and additional tests; how EHD1-mediated endosomal fission integrates with WASH complex/Arp2/3 and dynamin-controlled fission remains to be determined; additional experimentation is needed to test a wide range of receptors and whether their internalization induces EHD1 recruitment.
- Evident from the text: the recruitment and endosome-size analyses focus on a single cargo receptor (LRP1) and on mouse NIH3T3 and HeLa cell lines, so generalization to other SNX17 cargos and cell types is not established here.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
3 of 23 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ Abstract
SNX17 interacts with a multitude of receptors in a sequence-specific manner to regulate their recycling.
“Notably, SNX17 interacts with a multitude of receptors in a sequence-specific manner to regulate their recycling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [9] Donoso, 2009, Polarized traffic of LRP1 involves AP1B and SNX17 operating on Y-dependent sorting motifs in different pathways, Mol. Biol. Cell source
The Introduction reports that SNX17 binds several LDLR-family members, and the Results (p. 490) link a specific LRP1 motif to SNX17-dependent recycling. The paper does not establish that SNX17 regulates the recycling of a multitude of different receptors. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [10] Osborne, 2015, SNX17 affects T cell activation by regulating TCR and integrin recycling, J. Immunol source
- cites [11] Steinberg, 2012, SNX17 protects integrins from degradation by sorting between lysosomal and recycling pathways, J. Cell Biol source
- cites [12] Stockinger, 2002, The PX-domain protein SNX17 interacts with members of the LDL receptor family and modulates endocytosis of the LDL receptor, EMBO J source
The Results (page unavailable) show that SNX17 binds the intracellular tails of several LDL-receptor-family members but not megalin, supporting selective interaction. The Introduction and Discussion (pages unavailable) report enhanced LDLR endocytosis and suggest faster movement through endocytic or recycling compartments. They do not establish a specific binding sequence or show that SNX17 regulates recycling of all the receptors it binds. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data§ Results
The SNX17 PX domain does not interact with EHD1.
“no interaction with EHD1 was observed with this lipid-binding domain”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
EHD1 and SNX17 reside in a complex in cells.
“These data demonstrate that EHD1 and SNX17 reside in a complex in cells.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“In addition, IP with anti-EHD1 antibodies also led to detection of SNX17 (IP EHD1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data§ Introduction
EHD1 interaction with SNX17 depends on the presence of the SNX17 FERM B and FERM C domains.
“Recruitment of EHD1 to the SE leads to its direct interaction with SNX17 and depends on the presence of the SNX17 FERM B and FERM C domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
SNX17-containing endosomes are larger in EHD1-depleted cells than in WT cells.
“SNX17-containing endosomes were larger in EHD1-depleted cells than in WT cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data§ Introduction
EHD1 depletion leads to enlarged sorting endosome structures.
“Indeed, EHD1 depletion leads to enlarged SE structures, supporting a role of EHD1 in SE fission.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
SNX17 and EHD1 partially colocalize on endosomes.
“surface rendering and quantification of overlap volumes indicated that SNX17 and EHD1 partially colocalize on endosomes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
EHD1 and SNX17 directly interact.
“Coimmunoprecipitation experiments and in vitro assays provided evidence that EHD1 and SNX17 directly interact.”
- Also stated in: § Results · hedged
“These data support the notion that EHD1 and SNX17 reside within a complex in cells and are capable of direct interaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · hedged
- Findingown data§ Introduction
EHD1 undergoes recruitment to endosomal membranes upon induction of receptor-mediated endocytosis.
“Here we demonstrate that EHD1 undergoes recruitment to endosomal membranes upon induction of receptor-mediated endocytosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
Inducing internalization of LRP1 leads to recruitment of cytoplasmic EHD1 to endosomal membranes.
“We also found that inducing internalization of a SNX17 cargo receptor, low-density lipoprotein receptor–related protein 1 (LRP1), led to recruitment of cytoplasmic EHD1 to endosomal membranes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
The overlap between SNX17 and EHD1 on endosomes increases upon LRP1 internalization.
“and that this overlap further increases upon LRP1 internalization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Introduction
Recruitment of EHD1 to the sorting endosome leads to its direct interaction with SNX17.
“Recruitment of EHD1 to the SE leads to its direct interaction with SNX17 and depends on the presence of the SNX17 FERM B and FERM C domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
IP with anti-EHD1 antibodies led to detection of SNX17.
“In addition, IP with anti-EHD1 antibodies also led to detection of SNX17 (IP EHD1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Mutation of SNX17 W321 to W321A has no effect on its ability to bind EHD1.
“mutation of SNX17 to W321A had no effect on its ability to bind EHD1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Induced recruitment of EHD1 to SNX17-containing endosomes led to increased colocalization.
“As demonstrated in Fig. S5, A–F, insets), induced recruitment of EHD1 to SNX17-containing endosomes led to increased colocalization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
SNX17 showed only a modest mean ~20% recruitment upon induction of LRP1 internalization.
“showed only a modest mean ˜20% recruitment upon induction of LRP1 internalization (Fig. 3, C and D, and quantified in F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
EHD1 recruitment to SE is independent of SNX17.
“Overall, these data suggest that EHD1 recruitment to SE is independent of SNX17”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
“However, because SNX17 knockdown had little impact on the recruitment of EHD1 to endosomes, this suggests the following scenario (Fig. 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
- Findingown data§ Results
The percentage of SNX17 surface volume overlap with EHD1 increases significantly by 2- to 3-fold upon LRP1 uptake.
“As indicated, the percentage of SNX17 surface volume overlap with EHD1 increases significantly by 2- to 3-fold upon LRP1 uptake.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Remarkably, however, we observed a 2- to 3-fold increase in the surface overlap volume following 30-min internalization of LRP1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data§ Results
At steady state, in the absence of select uptake, EHD1 is visualized in the cytoplasm and on a smattering of puncta and small tubules, consistent with sorting endosomes (SE).
“At steady state, in the absence of select uptake, we visualized EHD1 in the cytoplasm and on a smattering of puncta and small tubules, consistent with SE (Fig. 3A, see inset for more detail).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Inducing LRP1 internalization and EHD1 recruitment leads to significantly more SNX17 overlap with EHD1.
“and that inducing LRP1 internalization and EHD1 recruitment leads to significantly more SNX17 overlap with EHD1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Discussion
Binding of SNX17 to EHD1 occurs through the SNX17 atypical FERM domain.
“Binding of SNX17 to EHD1 occurs through the SNX17 atypical FERM domain”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
EHD1 knockout cells appeared to have larger SNX17-containing endosomes.
“As shown in the representative micrographs (Fig. 6, A and B), EHD1 knockout cells indeed appeared to have larger SNX17-containing endosomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
In the absence of EHD1, the ratio of larger to smaller endosomes is higher compared with EHD1-GFP-containing cells.
“further highlights the notion that, in the absence of EHD1, the ratio of larger to smaller endosomes is higher compared with EHD1-GFP–containing cells (Fig. 6E, see shift to the right for the knockout in the inset).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Addition of a control antibody to the V5 epitope had no significant impact on EHD1 recruitment compared with LRP1 uptake.
“addition of a control antibody to the V5 epitope had no significant impact on EHD1 recruitment compared with LRP1 uptake (Fig. S4, A–C, and quantified in D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Quantification of total surface volume of EHD1-containing endosomes in cells that internalized LRP1 compared with untreated cells showed a mean ~300% increase per cell.
“Using 3D surface rendering of z-stacks with IMARIS software, we quantified the total surface volume of EHD1-containing endosomes in cells that internalized LRP1 compared with untreated cells, and we observed a mean ˜300% increase per cell (Fig. 3E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion
In the absence of EHD1, SNX17-containing endosomes increase in size.
“our data demonstrate that, in the absence of EHD1, SNX17-containing endosomes increase in size”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion
Receptor-mediated endocytosis of the LRP1 receptor induces massive recruitment of EHD1 to endosomal membranes.
“Our study demonstrates that receptor-mediated endocytosis of the LRP1 receptor induces massive recruitment of EHD1 to endosomal membranes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Incubating cells with an antibody to the SNX17-sorted cargo receptor LRP1 to induce its internalization dramatically increases the number and size of EHD1-containing puncta and small tubules.
“we observed a dramatic increase in the number and size of EHD1-containing puncta and small tubules (Fig. 3B, see inset for more detail).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
At steady state, ~20% of SNX17 overlaps with EHD1.
“Overall, these data support the notion that ˜20% of SNX17 overlaps with EHD1 at steady state”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
“Our data clearly show that ˜20% of SNX17 and EHD1 display overlap in 3D at steady state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
- Findingown data§ Discussion
We identified a novel direct interaction between the sorting nexin SNX17 and the endosomal fission protein EHD1.
“Overall, we identified a novel direct interaction between the sorting nexin SNX17 and the endosomal fission protein EHD1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Results
The EHD1 EH domain is not required for interaction with SNX17.
“These results support the notion that the EHD1 EH domain is not required for interaction with SNX17.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Introduction
The interaction between SNX17 and EHD1 provides a molecular explanation to couple the endosomal sorting and fission machineries.
“Our data are consistent with a new model of endosomal fission in which the interaction between SNX17 and EHD1 provides a molecular explanation to couple the endosomal sorting and fission machineries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms by which SNX17-labeled vesicles that contain sorted receptors bud and undergo vesicular fission from sorting endosomes remain elusive.
- Rests on an assumption: The mechanism by which EHD1 is coupled to various receptors and regulates their recycling remains unknown.
- Rests on an assumption: Direct interactions between EHD1 and the cytoplasmic tails of receptors have not been identified.
- Rests on an assumption: The mechanism of EHD1 recruitment and coupling to sorting endosomes has not been elucidated.
- Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms of coupling SNX17 and its cargo receptors to specific fission machinery at the sorting endosome remain unknown.
- Rests on an assumption: EHD1 appears to be recruited to sorting endosomes to facilitate fission of cargo in conjunction with SNX17-based cargo sorting.
- Interpretationown data§ Introduction
EHD1 plays a role in sorting endosome fission.
“Indeed, EHD1 depletion leads to enlarged SE structures, supporting a role of EHD1 in SE fission.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Abstract
EHD1 depletion impairs SNX17-mediated endosomal fission.
“suggesting that EHD1 depletion impairs SNX17-mediated endosomal fission.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Results
The SNX17 atypical FERM domain directly binds EHD1.
“These experiments suggest that the SNX17 atypical FERM domain directly binds to EHD1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion
Ultimately, EHD1 might play a significant role in fission of vesicles slated for recycling.
“Ultimately, EHD1 might play a significant role in fission of vesicles slated for recycling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ Discussion
The developed method using IMARIS surface rendering and Kiss and Run software converts 3D images of cells with EHD1-GFP and immunostained endogenous SNX17 to "3D surfaces," allowing effective filtering of most cytoplasmic protein haze.
“Accordingly, we developed a method using IMARIS surface rendering and Kiss and Run software in which 3D images of cells with EHD1-GFP and immunostained endogenous SNX17 were converted to “3D surfaces,” allowing us to effectively filter out most of the cytoplasmic protein haze.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Results
EHD1 recruitment to SE may rely on other interaction partners that are localized to SE.
“and may rely on other interaction partners that are localized to SE.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Results
Internalization of an SNX17-sorted receptor can lead to EHD1 recruitment to SE, potentially to facilitate fission events and recycling.
“These data suggest that internalization of an SNX17-sorted receptor can lead to EHD1 recruitment to SE, potentially to facilitate fission events and recycling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Discussion
EHD1 binding to SNX17 is atypical because most of the EHD1 interaction partners identified to date interact via NPF motifs.
“EHD1 binding to SNX17 is atypical because most of the EHD1 interaction partners identified to date interact via NPF motifs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [22] Naslavsky, 2005, C-terminal EH-domain-containing proteins: consensus for a role in endocytic trafficking, EH?, J. Cell Sci source
- cites [23] Naslavsky, 2011, EHD proteins: key conductors of endocytic transport, Trends Cell Biol source
A check is scheduled.
- cites [47] Kieken, 2010, Mechanism for the selective interaction of C-terminal Eps15 homology domain proteins with specific Asn-Pro-Phe-containing partners, J. Biol. Chem source
- Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion
The increase in SNX17-containing endosome size in the absence of EHD1 is likely a result of impaired fission.
“likely as a result of impaired fission.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ Results
Use of multiple z-sections and measurement of voxel overlap in this system provides the most accurate assessment of colocalization within the cell.
“Following extensive calibrations and comparisons with both 2D and 3D measurements of Pearson’s correlation and Manders overlap coefficient, we found that use of multiple z-sections and measurement of voxel overlap in this system provides the most accurate assessment of colocalization within the cell.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Discussion
SNX17 can couple internalized receptors with EHD1, a protein implicated in membrane fission.
“Here we demonstrated for the first time that a key sorting nexin, SNX17, can couple internalized receptors with EHD1, a protein implicated in membrane fission.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Discussion
This is the first evidence that EHD1 and endosomal fission machinery can be recruited to endosomal membranes by a specific physiologic signal.
“Indeed, to our knowledge, this is the first evidence that EHD1 and endosomal fission machinery can be recruited to endosomal membranes by a specific physiologic signal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion
SNX17 and EHD1 likely localize to common endosomal membrane complexes slated for budding and fission.
“Although it remains unclear whether SNX17 can simultaneously bind both receptors and EHD1, these proteins likely localize to common endosomal membrane complexes slated for budding and fission.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Probably not a substantial claim. 20
- It may state two separate claims as one. 13
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown data§ ResultsAn anti-EB3 antibody failed to precipitate SNX17.
“As a control, an anti-EB3 antibody failed to precipitate SNX17 (IP EB3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ ResultsBoth SNX17 FERM B and FERM C domains bind His-EHD1.
“both GST-FERM B and GST-FERM C domains were precipitated, whereas controls (GST alone or GST fused to the CH1 domain of MICAL-L1) were not precipitated”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ ResultsHis-EHD1 ΔEH pulls down similar levels of GST-SNX17 as full-length His-EHD1, whereas His-EH-1 shows decreased SNX17 pulldown.
“His-EHD1 ΔEH pulled down similar levels of GST-SNX17 as those observed upon full-length His-EHD1 pulldown. Moreover, when used as bait, His–EH-1 showed decreased SNX17 pulldown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ ResultsHis-EHD1 pulls down GST-SNX17 but not GST.
“His-EHD1 pulled down significant levels of GST-SNX17 (roughly equivalent to the 20% observed in the input), whereas His-EHD1 pulled down no detectable GST”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ ResultsFull-length SNX17 and each individual FERM domain show significant binding to His-EHD1 compared with the control MICAL-L1 CH1 domain.
“densitometric analysis from three experiments demonstrated that full-length SNX17 as well as each of the individual FERM domains showed significant binding to His-EHD1 compared with the control MICAL-L1 CH1 domain”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown data§ ResultsIP with antibodies to EHD1 led to detection of a weak, approximately 50-kDa band that was not observed in the lysate fraction for SNX27.
“IP with antibodies to EHD1 led to detection of a weak, ˜50-kDa band that was not observed in the lysate fraction for SNX27 (Fig. S1A, unknown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ ResultsThe receptor-antibody complex recycles and reappears on the plasma membrane within an hour of internalization and peaks on the cell surface at 2 h before undergoing additional uptake and removal from the plasma membrane.
“Moreover, we demonstrated that the receptor–antibody complex recycles and reappears on the plasma membrane within an hour of internalization and peaks on the cell surface at 2 h before undergoing additional uptake and removal from the plasma membrane (Fig. S3, C–F, and quantified in G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ ResultsThe distribution plot of SNX17-containing SE endosome size is shifted to the right upon EHD1 knockout and shows that as endosomes increase in size, particularly above a threshold of 3 μm2, the relative distribution of endosomes is increased in EHD1 knockout cells.
“The distribution plot is shifted to the right upon EHD1 knockout and shows that, as the endosomes increase in size (particularly above a threshold of 3 μm2), the relative distribution of endosomes is increased in EHD1 knockout cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ ResultsThe LRP1 antibody/LRP1 complex is internalized within 15-30 min and observed in endosomes.
“Typically, we observed that the LRP1 antibody/LRP1 complex is internalized within 15–30 min and observed in endosomes (Fig. S3, A and B, quantified in G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ AbstractEHD1 catalyzes fission and releases endosome-derived vesicles for recycling to the plasma membrane.
“Recent studies suggest that a dynamin-homolog, Eps15 homology domain protein 1, catalyzes fission and releases endosome-derived vesicles for recycling to the plasma membrane.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 8 sources checked- cites [14] Cai, 2012, cPLA2α and EHD1 interact and regulate the vesiculation of cholesterol-rich, GPI-anchored, protein-containing endosomes, Mol. Biol. Cell source
- cites [15] Cai, 2014, GRAF1 forms a complex with MICAL-L1 and EHD1 to cooperate in tubular recycling endosome vesiculation, Front. Cell Dev. Biol source
- cites [16] Caplan, 2002, A tubular EHD1-containing compartment involved in the recycling of major histocompatibility complex class I molecules to the plasma membrane, EMBO J source
- cites [17] Deo, 2018, ATP-dependent membrane remodeling links EHD1 functions to endocytic recycling, Nat. Commun source
- cites [18] Kamerkar, 2019, A screen for membrane fission catalysts identifies the ATPase EHD1, Biochemistry source
- cites [19] Rapaport, 2006, Recycling to the plasma membrane is delayed in EHD1 knockout mice, Traffic source
- cites [20] Sharma, 2009, MICAL-L1 links EHD1 to tubular recycling endosomes and regulates receptor recycling, Mol. Biol. Cell source
- cites [21] Jakobsson, 2011, Regulation of synaptic vesicle budding and dynamin function by an EHD ATPase, J. Neurosci source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown data§ ResultsEHD1 is recruited to SE, where it interacts with SNX17 and facilitates fission of transport vesicles.
“Overall, these data support the idea that EHD1 is recruited to SE, where it interacts with SNX17 and facilitates fission of transport vesicles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ DiscussionEndosomal fission mediated by EHD1 may include additional proteins involved in membrane curvature, such as cPLA2α.
“may include a variety of additional proteins involved in membrane curvature, such as cPLA2α”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Cai, 2012, cPLA2α and EHD1 interact and regulate the vesiculation of cholesterol-rich, GPI-anchored, protein-containing endosomes, Mol. Biol. Cell source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ DiscussionEHD1 is only one of several key mechanisms that regulate endosomal fission.
“However, EHD1 is only one of several key mechanisms that regulate endosomal fission”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone given§ DiscussionUpon LRP1 internalization, EHD1 is "activated" in the cytoplasm in a manner that might include ATP binding, dimerization, and/or phosphorylation and potentially other posttranslational modifications.
“Upon LRP1 internalization, EHD1 is “activated” in the cytoplasm in a manner that might include ATP binding, dimerization, and/or phosphorylation and potentially other posttranslational modifications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown data§ DiscussionBecause total SNX17 surface volume is only modestly increased upon LRP1 uptake, the increase in overlap with EHD1 comes primarily from a massive 3-fold recruitment of EHD1 to membrane surfaces upon LRP1 internalization.
“Significantly, because total SNX17 surface volume is only modestly increased upon LRP1 uptake, the increase in overlap with EHD1 comes primarily from a massive 3-fold recruitment of EHD1 to membrane surfaces upon LRP1 internalization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown data§ ResultsEHD1 is recruited to the SE membrane to catalyze fission and release transport vesicles to be targeted for recycling.
“We postulate that SNX17 selects and sorts cargo into budding structures on SE and that EHD1 is recruited to the SE membrane to catalyze fission and release transport vesicles to be targeted for recycling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationreasoning§ DiscussionRecruitment of EHD1 to endosomes by one or more EEIPs would explain why SNX17 knockdown did not affect recruitment.
“Recruitment of EHD1 to endosomes by one or more of these EEIPs would explain why SNX17 knockdown did not affect recruitment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationreasoning§ DiscussionEHD1 dimers might then interact with an endosomal EHD1 interaction partner (EEIP) at the endosomal membrane.
“The EHD1 dimers might then interact with an endosomal EHD1 interaction partner (EEIP) at the endosomal membrane.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone given§ DiscussionAll cell lines were routinely tested for Mycoplasma infection.
“All cell lines were routinely tested for Mycoplasma infection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown data§ DiscussionThis study provides new insight into coupling of the endosomal sorting and fission machineries, highlighting a significant role of EHD1 in the endosomal fission process.
“This study provides new insight into coupling of the endosomal sorting and fission machineries, highlighting a significant role of EHD1 in the endosomal fission process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ DiscussionEHD1 is a highly dynamic protein that cycles on and off of membranes, similar to many ATPases and GTPases.
“EHD1 is a highly dynamic protein that cycles on and off of membranes, similar to many ATPases and GTPases”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Caplan, 2002, A tubular EHD1-containing compartment involved in the recycling of major histocompatibility complex class I molecules to the plasma membrane, EMBO J source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationown data§ ResultsThe weak approximately 50-kDa band is most likely a nonspecific band enriched during the IP.
“the most likely explanation is that it is a nonspecific band that is enriched in the course of the IP.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Study design and conductnone given§ DiscussionExtensive washing of beads with 10 bed volumes of wash buffer removes nonspecifically bound proteins.
“To ensure the removal of any nonspecifically bound proteins, the beads were then washed extensively with 10 bed volumes of wash buffer”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductcitation§ DiscussionInitial attempts to quantify colocalization by imaging in two or three dimensions followed by application of Pearson's or Manders' coefficients did not accurately reflect the degree of overlap observed, likely because of the significant degree of cytoplasmic EHD1 haze that interferes with the analysis.
“did not accurately reflect the degree of overlap observed, likely because of the significant degree of cytoplasmic EHD1 haze that interferes with the analysis, especially in cells imaged without LRP1 internalization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] McDonald, 2013, Statistical tests for measures of colocalization in biological microscopy, J. Microsc source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ DiscussionProteins that interact with EHD1 without an NPF motif have been identified.
“However, proteins that interact with EHD1 without an NPF motif have been identified”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Shi, 2007, A novel requirement for C. elegans Alix/ALX-1 in RME-1-mediated membrane transport, Curr. Biol source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationreasoning§ DiscussionAfter recruitment, EHD1 might diffuse along the endosomal membrane, still bound to the EEIP via EH domain NPF motifs, until it comes into contact with and binds to SNX17 in an EH domain-independent mechanism, which is itself bound to a receptor cargo.
“After recruitment, EHD1 might be able to diffuse along the endosomal membrane, still bound to the EEIP via EH domain NPF motifs, until it comes into contact with and binds to SNX17 (in an EH domain–independent mechanism), which is itself bound to a receptor cargo.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone given§ ResultsSNX17 selects and sorts cargo into budding structures on SE.
“We postulate that SNX17 selects and sorts cargo into budding structures on SE and that EHD1 is recruited to the SE membrane to catalyze fission and release transport vesicles to be targeted for recycling.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ DiscussionThe process of endosomal fission mediated by EHD1 is highly complex.
“The process of endosomal fission mediated by EHD1 is highly complex”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ DiscussionMicrococcal nuclease treatment eliminates false positive interactions in protein-protein interaction assays.
“as described by Nguyen and Goodrich (60”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nguyen and Goodrich (60
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductown data§ DiscussionMore than 30 cells from three independent experiments were assessed using IMARIS.
“more than 30 cells from three independent experiments were assessed using IMARIS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation§ DiscussionThe WASH complex has been implicated in activation of the Arp2/3 actin polymerization nucleator at endosomes, a process thought to precede dynamin-controlled endosomal fission.
“the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein and SCAR homolog (WASH) complex has been implicated in activation of the Arp2/3 actin polymerization nucleator at endosomes, a process thought to precede dynamin-controlled endosomal fission”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] Derivery, 2009, The Arp2/3 activator WASH controls the fission of endosomes through a large multiprotein complex, Dev. Cell source
The paper relies on this without support.
The mechanisms by which SNX17-labeled vesicles that contain sorted receptors bud and undergo vesicular fission from sorting endosomes remain elusive.
“However, the mechanisms by which SNX17-labeled vesicles that contain sorted receptors bud and undergo vesicular fission from the sorting endosomes remain elusive.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The mechanism by which EHD1 is coupled to various receptors and regulates their recycling remains unknown.
“However, the mechanism by which EHD1 is coupled to various receptors and regulates their recycling remains unknown.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Whether WASH complex–mediated actin nucleation is sufficient for fission at sorting endosomes remains unknown.
“However, whether WASH complex–mediated actin nucleation is sufficient for fission at SE remains unknown”
The paper relies on this without support.
Direct interactions between EHD1 and the cytoplasmic tails of receptors have not been identified.
“However, to date, direct interactions between EHD1 and the cytoplasmic tails of receptors have not been identified.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The mechanism of EHD1 recruitment and coupling to sorting endosomes has not been elucidated.
“However, to date, the mechanism of EHD1 recruitment and coupling to SE has not been elucidated.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The mechanisms of coupling SNX17 and its cargo receptors to specific fission machinery at the sorting endosome remain unknown.
“However, the mechanisms of coupling SNX17 and its cargo receptors to specific fission machinery at the SE remain unknown.”
The paper relies on this without support.
EHD1 appears to be recruited to sorting endosomes to facilitate fission of cargo in conjunction with SNX17-based cargo sorting.
“because EHD1 appears to be recruited to SE to facilitate fission of cargo in conjunction with SNX17-based cargo sorting”
The paper relies on this without support.
Antibody-induced internalization of LRP1 is a valid model of physiological LRP1 trafficking.
“When incubated with an antibody to the SNX17-sorted cargo receptor low-density lipoprotein receptor–related protein 1 (LRP1)”
The paper relies on this without support.
SNX17 siRNA knockdown does not alter EHD1 expression or other factors that affect EHD1 recruitment.
“the same cells after SNX17 siRNA knockdown (decreased SNX17 expression validated and quantified in Fig. 5F)”
The paper relies on this without support.
EHD1-GFP expressed at endogenous levels in CRISPR/Cas9-edited NIH3T3 cells behaves like wild-type EHD1.
“we used mock (untreated) NIH3T3 CRISPR/Cas9 gene-edited EHD1-GFP cells”
The paper relies on this without support.
EHD1 knockout does not cause compensatory changes that affect SNX17-containing endosome size.
“we again used CRISPR/Cas9 gene-edited NIH3T3 cells and initially compared the size of SNX17-containing endosomes in EHD1-GFP and EHD1 knockout cells”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
SNX17 siRNA-treated cells are described as knockout cells
MinorThe experiment is described as an siRNA knockdown of SNX17, but the same cells are subsequently called SNX17 knockout cells. Knockdown and knockout are different conditions.
“However, when SNX17 knockout cells were subjected to LRP1 internalization, EHD1 was again recruited to endosomes in a manner similar to that seen in mock-treated cells (Fig. 5D and quantified in E).”
“For SNX17 siRNA-treated cells without internalization of LRP1, the distribution of EHD1 remained similar to that observed for mock-treated cells, with a mostly cytoplasmic distribution pattern and a smattering of vesicles and tubules (Fig. 5C and quantified in E).”
Citations
Cites
A Membrane Coat Complex Essential for Endosome-to-Golgi Retrograde Transport in Yeast
Seaman, M. N. J., Michael McCaffery, J., & Emr, S. D. (1998) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.142.3.665 · Cited by 698
The Arp2/3 Activator WASH Controls the Fission of Endosomes through a Large Multiprotein Complex
Derivery, E., Sousa, C., Gautier, J. J., Lombard, B., Loew, D., & Gautreau, A. (2009) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2009.09.010 · Cited by 602
Role of the mammalian retromer in sorting of the cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor
Arighi, C. N., Hartnell, L. M., Aguilar, R. C., Haft, C. R., & Bonifacino, J. S. (2004) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200312055 · Cited by 580
Steinberg, F., Gallon, M., Winfield, M., Thomas, E. C., Bell, A. J., Heesom, K. J., Tavaré, J. M., & Cullen, P. J. (2013) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2721 · Cited by 524
A FAM21-Containing WASH Complex Regulates Retromer-Dependent Sorting
Gomez, T. S., & Billadeau, D. D. (2009) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2009.09.009 · Cited by 521
Temkin, P., Lauffer, B., Jäger, S., Cimermancic, P., Krogan, N. J., & von Zastrow, M. (2011) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2252 · Cited by 459
Retromer: A Master Conductor of Endosome Sorting
Burd, C., & Cullen, P. J. (2014) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a016774 · Cited by 435
Endosomal sorting and signalling: an emerging role for sorting nexins
Cullen, P. J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2427 · Cited by 404
The enigmatic endosome—sorting the ins and outs of endocytic trafficking
Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S. (2018) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.216499 · Cited by 353
Self-citationRetriever is a multiprotein complex for retromer-independent endosomal cargo recycling
McNally, K. E., Faulkner, R., Steinberg, F., Gallon, M., Ghai, R., Pim, D., Langton, P., Pearson, N., Danson, C. M., Nägele, H., et al. (2017) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3610 · Cited by 346
Architectural and mechanistic insights into an EHD ATPase involved in membrane remodelling
Daumke, O., Lundmark, R., Vallis, Y., Martens, S., Butler, P. J. G., & McMahon, H. T. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06173 · Cited by 304
Caplan, S., Naslavsky, N., Hartnell, L. M., Lodge, R., Polishchuk, R. S., Donaldson, J. G., & Bonifacino, J. S. (2002) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/21.11.2557 · Cited by 270
Self-citationEvidence that RME-1, a conserved C. elegans EH-domain protein, functions in endocytic recycling
Grant, B. D., Zhang, Y., Paupard, M., Lin, S. X. H., Hall, D. H., & Hirsh, D. (2001) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/35078549 · Cited by 269
SNX27 mediates PDZ-directed sorting from endosomes to the plasma membrane
Lauffer, B. E. L., Melero, C., Temkin, P., Lei, C., Hong, W., Kortemme, T., & von Zastrow, M. (2010) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201004060 · Cited by 260
Harbour, M. E., Breusegem, S. Y., & Seaman, M. N. J. (2012) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20111761 · Cited by 238
EHD proteins: key conductors of endocytic transport
Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S. (2011) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2010.10.003 · Cited by 237
Self-citationJia, D., Gomez, T. S., Metlagel, Z., Umetani, J., Otwinowski, Z., Rosen, M. K., & Billadeau, D. D. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0913293107 · Cited by 232
Lin, S. X., Grant, B., Hirsh, D., & Maxfield, F. R. (2001) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/35078543 · Cited by 226
SNX17 protects integrins from degradation by sorting between lysosomal and recycling pathways
Steinberg, F., Heesom, K. J., Bass, M. D., & Cullen, P. J. (2012) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201111121 · Cited by 206
Jia, D., Gomez, T. S., Billadeau, D. D., & Rosen, M. K. (2012) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e11-12-1059 · Cited by 200
Towards a molecular understanding of endosomal trafficking by Retromer and Retriever
Chen, K., Healy, M. D., & Collins, B. M. (2019) · Traffic · doi:10.1111/tra.12649 · Cited by 193
Gallon, M., Clairfeuille, T., Steinberg, F., Mas, C., Ghai, R., Sessions, R. B., Teasdale, R. D., Collins, B. M., & Cullen, P. J. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1410552111 · Cited by 182
Endosomal receptor trafficking: Retromer and beyond
Wang, J., Fedoseienko, A., Chen, B., Burstein, E., Jia, D., & Billadeau, D. D. (2018) · Traffic · doi:10.1111/tra.12574 · Cited by 180
MICAL-L1 Links EHD1 to Tubular Recycling Endosomes and Regulates Receptor Recycling
Sharma, M., Panapakkam Giridharan, S. S., Rahajeng, J., Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S. (2009) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e09-06-0535 · Cited by 173
Self-citationInteractions between EHD Proteins and Rab11-FIP2: A Role for EHD3 in Early Endosomal Transport
Naslavsky, N., Rahajeng, J., Sharma, M., Jović, M., & Caplan, S. (2006) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e05-05-0466 · Cited by 171
Self-citationA molecular code for endosomal recycling of phosphorylated cargos by the SNX27–retromer complex
Clairfeuille, T., Mas, C., Chan, A. S. M., Yang, Z., Tello-Lafoz, M., Chandra, M., Widagdo, J., Kerr, M. C., Paul, B., Mérida, I., et al. (2016) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.3290 · Cited by 164
Braun, A., Pinyol, R., Dahlhaus, R., Koch, D., Fonarev, P., Grant, B. D., Kessels, M. M., & Qualmann, B. (2005) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e05-01-0076 · Cited by 151
Rabenosyn-5 and EHD1 Interact and Sequentially Regulate Protein Recycling to the Plasma Membrane
Naslavsky, N., Boehm, M., Backlund, P. S., & Caplan, S. (2004) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e03-10-0733 · Cited by 151
Self-citationSorting nexin 17 facilitates LRP recycling in the early endosome
van Kerkhof, P., Lee, J., McCormick, L., Tetrault, E., Lu, W., Schoenfish, M., Oorschot, V., Strous, G. J., Klumperman, J., & Bu, G. (2005) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600756 · Cited by 148
Statistical tests for measures of colocalization in biological microscopy
MCDONALD, J. H., & DUNN, K. W. (2013) · Journal of Microscopy · doi:10.1111/jmi.12093 · Cited by 140
Getting active: protein sorting in endocytic recycling
Hsu, V. W., Bai, M., & Li, J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3332 · Cited by 139
Mechanisms of EHD/RME‐1 Protein Function in Endocytic Transport
Grant, B. D., & Caplan, S. (2008) · Traffic · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00834.x · Cited by 137
Self-citationStructural basis for endosomal trafficking of diverse transmembrane cargos by PX-FERM proteins
Ghai, R., Bugarcic, A., Liu, H., Norwood, S. J., Skeldal, S., Coulson, E. J., Li, S. S.-C., Teasdale, R. D., & Collins, B. M. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1216229110 · Cited by 134
Stockinger, W., Sailler, B., Strasser, V., Recheis, B., Fasching, D., Kahr, L., Schneider, W. J., & Nimpf, J. (2002) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/cdf435 · Cited by 130
Association of Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 Receptor with EHD1 and SNAP29
Rotem-Yehudar, R., Galperin, E., & Horowitz, M. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m009913200 · Cited by 120
MICAL‐L1 is a Tubular Endosomal Membrane Hub that Connects Rab35 and Arf6 With Rab8a
Rahajeng, J., Panapakkam Giridharan, S. S., Cai, B., Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S. (2012) · Traffic · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01294.x · Cited by 106
Self-citationCooperation of MICAL-L1, syndapin2, and phosphatidic acid in tubular recycling endosome biogenesis
Giridharan, S. S. P., Cai, B., Vitale, N., Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S. (2013) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e13-01-0026 · Cited by 105
Self-citationProtein-protein interaction assays: eliminating false positive interactions
Nguyen, T. N., & Goodrich, J. A. (2006) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth0206-135 · Cited by 99
C-terminal EH-domain-containing proteins: consensus for a role in endocytic trafficking, EH?
Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S. (2005) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.02595 · Cited by 98
Self-citationYeow, I., Howard, G., Chadwick, J., Mendoza-Topaz, C., Hansen, C. G., Nichols, B. J., & Shvets, E. (2017) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.07.047 · Cited by 84
ATP Binding Regulates Oligomerization and Endosome Association of RME-1 Family Proteins
Lee, D., Zhao, X., Scarselletta, S., Schweinsberg, P. J., Eisenberg, E., Grant, B. D., & Greene, L. E. (2005) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m412751200 · Cited by 80
ATP-dependent membrane remodeling links EHD1 functions to endocytic recycling
Deo, R., Kushwah, M. S., Kamerkar, S. C., Kadam, N. Y., Dar, S., Babu, K., Srivastava, A., & Pucadyil, T. J. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07586-z · Cited by 77
Lee, S., Chang, J., & Blackstone, C. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10939 · Cited by 73
Donoso, M., Cancino, J., Lee, J., van Kerkhof, P., Retamal, C., Bu, G., Gonzalez, A., Cáceres, A., & Marzolo, M.-P. (2009) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e08-08-0805 · Cited by 69
Recycling to the Plasma Membrane is Delayed in EHD1 Knockout Mice
Rapaport, D., Auerbach, W., Naslavsky, N., Pasmanik‐Chor, M., Galperin, E., Fein, A., Caplan, S., Joyner, A. L., & Horowitz, M. (2006) · Traffic · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00359.x · Cited by 67
Self-citationA Novel Requirement for C. elegans Alix/ALX-1 in RME-1-Mediated Membrane Transport
Shi, A., Pant, S., Balklava, Z., Chen, C. C.-H., Figueroa, V., & Grant, B. D. (2007) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.045 · Cited by 64
Rabankyrin‐5 Interacts with EHD 1 and Vps 26 to Regulate Endocytic Trafficking and Retromer Function
Zhang, J., Reiling, C., Reinecke, J. B., Prislan, I., Marky, L. A., Sorgen, P. L., Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S. (2012) · Traffic · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0854.2012.01334.x · Cited by 57
Self-citationFunctions of Sorting Nexin 17 Domains and Recognition Motif for P-selectin Trafficking
Knauth, P., Schlüter, T., Czubayko, M., Kirsch, C., Florian, V., Schreckenberger, S., Hahn, H., & Bohnensack, R. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.02.004 · Cited by 55
Farfán, P., Lee, J., Larios, J., Sotelo, P., Bu, G., & Marzolo, M. (2013) · Traffic · doi:10.1111/tra.12076 · Cited by 51
Cai, B., Caplan, S., & Naslavsky, N. (2012) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e11-10-0881 · Cited by 51
Self-citationSNX17 Affects T Cell Activation by Regulating TCR and Integrin Recycling
Osborne, D. G., Piotrowski, J. T., Dick, C. J., Zhang, J.-S., & Billadeau, D. D. (2015) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1402734 · Cited by 50
Regulation of Synaptic Vesicle Budding and Dynamin Function by an EHD ATPase
Jakobsson, J., Ackermann, F., Andersson, F., Larhammar, D., Löw, P., & Brodin, L. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1289-11.2011 · Cited by 44
Structural insights into the activation mechanism of dynamin-like EHD ATPases
de Melo, A. A., Hegde, B. G., Shah, C., Larsson, E., Isas, J. M., Kunz, S., Lundmark, R., Langen, R., & Daumke, O. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1614075114 · Cited by 42
Kieken, F., Jović, M., Naslavsky, N., Caplan, S., & Sorgen, P. L. (2007) · Journal of Biomolecular NMR · doi:10.1007/s10858-007-9196-0 · Cited by 40
Self-citationMutually exclusive interactions of EHD1 with GS32 and Syndapin II
Xu, Y., Shi, H., Wei, S., Wong, S. H., & Hong, W. (2004) · Molecular Membrane Biology · doi:10.1080/09687680410001716871 · Cited by 39
Kieken, F., Sharma, M., Jović, M., Giridharan, S. S. P., Naslavsky, N., Caplan, S., & Sorgen, P. L. (2010) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m109.045666 · Cited by 38
Self-citationGRAF1 forms a complex with MICAL-L1 and EHD1 to cooperate in tubular recycling endosome vesiculation
Cai, B., Xie, S., Caplan, S., & Naslavsky, N. (2014) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2014.00022 · Cited by 37
Self-citationKieken, F., Jović, M., Tonelli, M., Naslavsky, N., Caplan, S., & Sorgen, P. L. (2009) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.258 · Cited by 28
Self-citationTrafficking cascades mediated by Rab35 and its membrane hub effector, MICAL-L1
Giridharan, S. S. P., Cai, B., Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S. (2012) · Communicative & Integrative Biology · doi:10.4161/cib.20064 · Cited by 27
Self-citationSharma, M., Giridharan, S. S. P., Rahajeng, J., Caplan, S., & Naslavsky, N. (2010) · Communicative & Integrative Biology · doi:10.4161/cib.3.2.10845 · Cited by 26
Self-citationGhai, R., & Collins, B. M. (2011) · Small GTPases · doi:10.4161/sgtp.2.5.17276 · Cited by 21
A Screen for Membrane Fission Catalysts Identifies the ATPase EHD1
Kamerkar, S. C., Roy, K., Bhattacharyya, S., & Pucadyil, T. J. (2019) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00925 · Cited by 18
The recognition of membrane-bound PtdIns3P by PX domains
Jia, Z., Ghai, R., Collins, B. M., & Mark, A. E. (2014) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24593 · Cited by 15
Vesicular trafficking plays a role in centriole disengagement and duplication
Xie, S., Reinecke, J. B., Farmer, T., Bahl, K., Yeow, I., Nichols, B. J., McLamarrah, T. A., Naslavsky, N., Rogers, G. C., & Caplan, S. (2018) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e18-04-0241 · Cited by 14
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Moulton, M. J., Barish, S., Ralhan, I., Chang, J., Goodman, L. D., Harland, J. G., Marcogliese, P. C., Johansson, J. O., Ioannou, M. S., & Bellen, H. J. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2112095118 · Cited by 180
Multiple roles for actin in secretory and endocytic pathways
Chakrabarti, R., Lee, M., & Higgs, H. N. (2021) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.03.038 · Cited by 87
Giridharan, S. S. P., Luo, G., Rivero-Rios, P., Steinfeld, N., Tronchere, H., Singla, A., Burstein, E., Billadeau, D. D., Sutton, M. A., & Weisman, L. S. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.69709 · Cited by 61
Assembly and fission of tubular carriers mediating protein sorting in endosomes
Gopaldass, N., Chen, K., Collins, B. M., & Mayer, A. (2024) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-024-00746-8 · Cited by 59
Defining the protein and lipid constituents of tubular recycling endosomes
Farmer, T., Xie, S., Naslavsky, N., Stöckli, J., James, D. E., & Caplan, S. (2021) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra120.015992 · Cited by 34
Self-citationFERARI and cargo adaptors coordinate cargo flow through sorting endosomes
Solinger, J. A., Rashid, H., & Spang, A. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32377-y · Cited by 29
The role of endocytic trafficking in antigen T cell receptor activation
Evnouchidou, I., Caillens, V., Koumantou, D., & Saveanu, L. (2021) · Biomedical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bj.2021.09.004 · Cited by 27
Advances and challenges in understanding endosomal sorting and fission
Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S. (2022) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.16687 · Cited by 24
Self-citationCoronin2A links actin-based endosomal processes to the EHD1 fission machinery
Dhawan, K., Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S. (2022) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e21-12-0624 · Cited by 23
Self-citationJones, T., Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239657 · Cited by 22
Self-citationClathrin-associated carriers enable recycling through a kiss-and-run mechanism
Xu, J., Liang, Y., Li, N., Dang, S., Jiang, A., Liu, Y., Guo, Y., Yang, X., Yuan, Y., Zhang, X., et al. (2024) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-024-01499-4 · Cited by 19
Endosomal actin branching, fission, and receptor recycling require FCHSD2 recruitment by MICAL-L1
Frisby, D., Murakonda, A. B., Ashraf, B., Dhawan, K., Almeida-Souza, L., Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S. (2024) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e24-07-0324 · Cited by 12
Self-citationBhattacharyya, S. S., & Pucadyil, T. J. (2020) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.3860 · Cited by 12
The retromer complex regulates C. elegans development and mammalian ciliogenesis
Xie, S., Dierlam, C., Smith, E., Duran, R., Williams, A., Davis, A., Mathew, D., Naslavsky, N., Iyer, J., & Caplan, S. (2022) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.259396 · Cited by 11
Self-citationWunderley, L., Zhang, L., Yarwood, R., Qin, W., Lowe, M., & Woodman, P. G. (2021) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.258549 · Cited by 9
Claudin-4 localization in epithelial ovarian cancer
Neville, M. C., Webb, P. G., Baumgartner, H. K., & Bitler, B. G. (2022) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10862 · Cited by 9
Jones, T., Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S. (2022) · Traffic · doi:10.1111/tra.12845 · Cited by 7
Self-citationHe, X., Zhou, S., Ji, Y., Zhang, Y., Lv, J., Quan, S., Zhang, J., Zhao, X., Cui, W., Li, W., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.916098 · Cited by 6
A missense mutation in Ehd1 associated with defective spermatogenesis and male infertility
Meindl, K., Issler, N., Afonso, S., Cebrian-Serrano, A., Müller, K., Sterner, C. W., Othmen, H., Tegtmeier, I., Witzgall, R., Klootwijk, E. D., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2023.1240558 · Cited by 4
Misri, G., Murakonda, A. B., Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S. (2025) · Traffic · doi:10.1111/tra.70015 · Cited by 3
Self-citationIntegrin receptor trafficking in health and disease
Samuel, V., Rajeev, T., Ramesh, L., & Sundararaman, A. (2022) · Progress in molecular biology and translational science · doi:10.1016/bs.pmbts.2022.09.008 · Cited by 3
Interactions of VMAT2 with CDCrel-1 and Parkin in Methamphetamine Neurotoxicity
Chauhan, H., Carruthers, N. J., Stemmer, P. M., Schneider, B. L., & Moszczyńska, A. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms252313070 · Cited by 2
The endocytic fission protein EHD1 interacts with tubulin and regulates microtubule function
Ashraf, B., Reddick-Umoja, J., Grant, J., Iyer, J., Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S. (2026) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2026.120120 · Cited by 1
Self-citationEndosomal actin attenuation and fission are regulated by MICAL2
Murakonda, A. B., Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S. (2026) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.264592 · Cited by 1
Self-citationCROP2, a Retriever-PROPPIN Complex Mediating Protein Export from Endosomes to the Plasma MembranePreprint
Leo, M. G. D., & Mayer, A. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.109403.1 · Cited by 1
Characterization of the viral replicase of hepatitis E virus
Metzger, K. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/f146e3e7zb582z42cdzbf30z5d7cc4575a9b
CROP2, a Retriever-PROPPIN Complex Mediating Protein Export from Endosomes to the Plasma MembranePreprint
Leo, M. G. D., & Mayer, A. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.1101/2025.10.08.681146
Leo, M. G. D., & Mayer, A. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.109403
Protrudin acts at ER-endosome contacts to promote KIF5-mediated endosomal tubule fission
Kleniuk, J., Nadadhur, A. G., Rodger, C. E., Wolfenden, E., Hall, I. A., Cheers, S. R., Zlamalova, E., & Reid, E. (2025) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2025.107231
ARF-1 coordinates cargo sorting at FERARI endosomal recycling hubs
Solinger, J. A., Franziscus, C. A., Nuredini, T., Müller, D., Clement, S., Ritz, D., Adarska, P., Bottanelli, F., & Spang, A. (2026) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.202512157
Selot, J. (2025) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/74c30d2aze916z480cz9e3fzc8cae81b5f04
A Quarter Century of EHD Protein Research: From Endosomal Recycling to Ciliopathies
Frisby, D., Misri, G., Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S. (2026) · Traffic · doi:10.1111/tra.70039
Self-citationSNX17 facilitates entry and infection of Rift Valley fever virus and related bunyaviruses
Ganaie, S. S., Fatma, F., Hu, Z., Grodzki, M., Rush, R. E., Clees, J., Brown, G., Barreca, O., Cui, X., Cho, B.-K., et al. (2026) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2026.118082
Metadata
- Authors
- Dhawan, K., Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
- Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Caplan, Steve
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 295
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3837-3850
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7086038
- OpenAlex
- W3006483309
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- HHS | National Institutes of Health (1R01GM123557, P20 GM103427)
- Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (2019–41)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
- Keywords
- SNX17, EHD1, endosomal sorting, endosomal trafficking, receptor recycling, LRP1, dynamin-related proteins, sorting nexins
- MeSH terms
- Gene Editing, Animals, Cell Membrane, HeLa Cells, Humans, Protein Binding, Endosomes, Recombinant Proteins, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-1, Vesicular Transport Proteins, RNA Interference, RNA, Small Interfering, NIH 3T3 Cells, Mice, Sorting Nexins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review