Cited by 36Cellular transport and secretionAutophagy in Disease and TherapyExtracellular vesicles in disease

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 23 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Sorting nexin 17 (SNX17) links endosomal sorting to Eps15 homology domain protein 1 (EHD1)–mediated fission machinery

Open access
Dhawan, Kanika, Naslavsky, Naava, Caplan, Steve·2020·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Following endocytosis, receptors that are internalized to sorting endosomes are sorted to different pathways, in part by sorting nexin (SNX) proteins. Notably, SNX17 interacts with a multitude of receptors in a sequence-specific manner to regulate their recycling. However, the mechanisms by which SNX17-labeled vesicles that contain sorted receptors bud and undergo vesicular fission from the sorting endosomes remain elusive. Recent studies suggest that a dynamin-homolog, Eps15 homology domain protein 1, catalyzes fission and releases endosome-derived vesicles for recycling to the plasma membrane. However, the mechanism by which EHD1 is coupled to various receptors and regulates their recycling remains unknown. Here we sought to characterize the mechanism by which EHD1 couples with SNX17 to regulate recycling of SNX17-interacting receptors. We hypothesized that SNX17 couples receptors to the EHD1 fission machinery in mammalian cells. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments and in vitro assays provided evidence that EHD1 and SNX17 directly interact. We also found that inducing internalization of a SNX17 cargo receptor, low-density lipoprotein receptor–related protein 1 (LRP1), led to recruitment of cytoplasmic EHD1 to endosomal membranes. Moreover, surface rendering and quantification of overlap volumes indicated that SNX17 and EHD1 partially colocalize on endosomes and that this overlap further increases upon LRP1 internalization. Additionally, SNX17-containing endosomes were larger in EHD1-depleted cells than in WT cells, suggesting that EHD1 depletion impairs SNX17-mediated endosomal fission. Our findings help clarify our current understanding of endocytic trafficking, providing significant additional insight into the process of endosomal fission and connecting the sorting and fission machineries.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study identifies a direct interaction between the sorting nexin SNX17 and the dynamin-like ATPase EHD1, linking endosomal cargo sorting to the fission machinery. Internalization of the SNX17 cargo receptor LRP1 recruits EHD1 to endosomal membranes, and EHD1 depletion enlarges SNX17-containing endosomes, consistent with impaired fission.

Key findings

  • EHD1 and SNX17 co-immunoprecipitate from HeLa lysates and interact directly in vitro: His-EHD1 pulled down GST-SNX17 at roughly the level of the 20% input, but no detectable GST alone.
  • Binding maps to the SNX17 atypical FERM domain: both GST-FERM B and GST-FERM C were precipitated by His-EHD1, whereas the SNX17 PX domain was not; the SNX17 W321A mutation had no effect on EHD1 binding. The EHD1 EH domain was not required (His-EHD1 ΔEH pulled down similar GST-SNX17 levels as full-length; His–EH-1 showed decreased pulldown).
  • LRP1 internalization recruited EHD1 to endosomes: mean ~300% increase in total surface volume of EHD1-containing endosomes per cell, while SNX17 showed only a modest mean ~20% recruitment. Surface overlap of SNX17 with EHD1 was ~20% at steady state and increased 2- to 3-fold upon LRP1 uptake.
  • EHD1 recruitment was SNX17-independent (SNX17 siRNA knockdown did not prevent LRP1-induced EHD1 recruitment), but EHD1 knockout cells had larger SNX17-containing endosomes, with the size distribution shifted right, particularly above a 3 μm² threshold.

Methods

  • Cell systems: HeLa cells for co-immunoprecipitation; CRISPR/Cas9 gene-edited NIH3T3 cells expressing endogenous EHD1-GFP and EHD1 knockout NIH3T3 cells; SNX17 knockdown by siRNA (Dharmacon SMARTpool, 48 h).
  • Binding assays: purified recombinant GST-SNX17, GST-FERM B, GST-FERM C, GST-PX, GST-MICAL-L1 CH1, and His-EHD1, His-EHD1 ΔEH, His–EH-1, used in Ni²⁺-NTA pulldown/direct interaction assays with micrococcal nuclease treatment; densitometry from three experiments.
  • Imaging/quantification: LRP1 antibody uptake (30 min on ice, then 30 min at 37 °C), confocal z-stacks (Zeiss LSM 800, ×63/1.4 NA), IMARIS 3D surface rendering plus Kiss and Run surface–surface overlap module; >30 cells from three independent experiments; two-tailed t tests and frequency distributions in GraphPad Prism.

Limitations

  • Stated by the paper: it remains unclear whether SNX17 can simultaneously bind both receptors and EHD1; whether a weak EHD1–SNX27 interaction exists requires MS and additional tests; how EHD1-mediated endosomal fission integrates with WASH complex/Arp2/3 and dynamin-controlled fission remains to be determined; additional experimentation is needed to test a wide range of receptors and whether their internalization induces EHD1 recruitment.
  • Evident from the text: the recruitment and endosome-size analyses focus on a single cargo receptor (LRP1) and on mouse NIH3T3 and HeLa cell lines, so generalization to other SNX17 cargos and cell types is not established here.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.ra119.011368

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

3 of 23 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    SNX17 interacts with a multitude of receptors in a sequence-specific manner to regulate their recycling.

    “Notably, SNX17 interacts with a multitude of receptors in a sequence-specific manner to regulate their recycling.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [9] Donoso, 2009, Polarized traffic of LRP1 involves AP1B and SNX17 operating on Y-dependent sorting motifs in different pathways, Mol. Biol. Cell source

      The Introduction reports that SNX17 binds several LDLR-family members, and the Results (p. 490) link a specific LRP1 motif to SNX17-dependent recycling. The paper does not establish that SNX17 regulates the recycling of a multitude of different receptors. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [10] Osborne, 2015, SNX17 affects T cell activation by regulating TCR and integrin recycling, J. Immunol source
    • cites [11] Steinberg, 2012, SNX17 protects integrins from degradation by sorting between lysosomal and recycling pathways, J. Cell Biol source
    • cites [12] Stockinger, 2002, The PX-domain protein SNX17 interacts with members of the LDL receptor family and modulates endocytosis of the LDL receptor, EMBO J source

      The Results (page unavailable) show that SNX17 binds the intracellular tails of several LDL-receptor-family members but not megalin, supporting selective interaction. The Introduction and Discussion (pages unavailable) report enhanced LDLR endocytosis and suggest faster movement through endocytic or recycling compartments. They do not establish a specific binding sequence or show that SNX17 regulates recycling of all the receptors it binds. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data
    § Results

    The SNX17 PX domain does not interact with EHD1.

    “no interaction with EHD1 was observed with this lipid-binding domain”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Results

    EHD1 and SNX17 reside in a complex in cells.

    “These data demonstrate that EHD1 and SNX17 reside in a complex in cells.”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “In addition, IP with anti-EHD1 antibodies also led to detection of SNX17 (IP EHD1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Introduction

    EHD1 interaction with SNX17 depends on the presence of the SNX17 FERM B and FERM C domains.

    “Recruitment of EHD1 to the SE leads to its direct interaction with SNX17 and depends on the presence of the SNX17 FERM B and FERM C domains.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Abstract

    SNX17-containing endosomes are larger in EHD1-depleted cells than in WT cells.

    “SNX17-containing endosomes were larger in EHD1-depleted cells than in WT cells”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 20
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 13
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    An anti-EB3 antibody failed to precipitate SNX17.

    “As a control, an anti-EB3 antibody failed to precipitate SNX17 (IP EB3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    Both SNX17 FERM B and FERM C domains bind His-EHD1.

    “both GST-FERM B and GST-FERM C domains were precipitated, whereas controls (GST alone or GST fused to the CH1 domain of MICAL-L1) were not precipitated”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    His-EHD1 ΔEH pulls down similar levels of GST-SNX17 as full-length His-EHD1, whereas His-EH-1 shows decreased SNX17 pulldown.

    “His-EHD1 ΔEH pulled down similar levels of GST-SNX17 as those observed upon full-length His-EHD1 pulldown. Moreover, when used as bait, His–EH-1 showed decreased SNX17 pulldown.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    His-EHD1 pulls down GST-SNX17 but not GST.

    “His-EHD1 pulled down significant levels of GST-SNX17 (roughly equivalent to the 20% observed in the input), whereas His-EHD1 pulled down no detectable GST”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    Full-length SNX17 and each individual FERM domain show significant binding to His-EHD1 compared with the control MICAL-L1 CH1 domain.

    “densitometric analysis from three experiments demonstrated that full-length SNX17 as well as each of the individual FERM domains showed significant binding to His-EHD1 compared with the control MICAL-L1 CH1 domain”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    IP with antibodies to EHD1 led to detection of a weak, approximately 50-kDa band that was not observed in the lysate fraction for SNX27.

    “IP with antibodies to EHD1 led to detection of a weak, ˜50-kDa band that was not observed in the lysate fraction for SNX27 (Fig. S1A, unknown).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    The receptor-antibody complex recycles and reappears on the plasma membrane within an hour of internalization and peaks on the cell surface at 2 h before undergoing additional uptake and removal from the plasma membrane.

    “Moreover, we demonstrated that the receptor–antibody complex recycles and reappears on the plasma membrane within an hour of internalization and peaks on the cell surface at 2 h before undergoing additional uptake and removal from the plasma membrane (Fig. S3, C–F, and quantified in G).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    The distribution plot of SNX17-containing SE endosome size is shifted to the right upon EHD1 knockout and shows that as endosomes increase in size, particularly above a threshold of 3 μm2, the relative distribution of endosomes is increased in EHD1 knockout cells.

    “The distribution plot is shifted to the right upon EHD1 knockout and shows that, as the endosomes increase in size (particularly above a threshold of 3 μm2), the relative distribution of endosomes is increased in EHD1 knockout cells.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    The LRP1 antibody/LRP1 complex is internalized within 15-30 min and observed in endosomes.

    “Typically, we observed that the LRP1 antibody/LRP1 complex is internalized within 15–30 min and observed in endosomes (Fig. S3, A and B, quantified in G).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    EHD1 catalyzes fission and releases endosome-derived vesicles for recycling to the plasma membrane.

    “Recent studies suggest that a dynamin-homolog, Eps15 homology domain protein 1, catalyzes fission and releases endosome-derived vesicles for recycling to the plasma membrane.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 8 sources checked
    • cites [14] Cai, 2012, cPLA2α and EHD1 interact and regulate the vesiculation of cholesterol-rich, GPI-anchored, protein-containing endosomes, Mol. Biol. Cell source
    • cites [15] Cai, 2014, GRAF1 forms a complex with MICAL-L1 and EHD1 to cooperate in tubular recycling endosome vesiculation, Front. Cell Dev. Biol source
    • cites [16] Caplan, 2002, A tubular EHD1-containing compartment involved in the recycling of major histocompatibility complex class I molecules to the plasma membrane, EMBO J source
    • cites [17] Deo, 2018, ATP-dependent membrane remodeling links EHD1 functions to endocytic recycling, Nat. Commun source
    • cites [18] Kamerkar, 2019, A screen for membrane fission catalysts identifies the ATPase EHD1, Biochemistry source
    • cites [19] Rapaport, 2006, Recycling to the plasma membrane is delayed in EHD1 knockout mice, Traffic source
    • cites [20] Sharma, 2009, MICAL-L1 links EHD1 to tubular recycling endosomes and regulates receptor recycling, Mol. Biol. Cell source
    • cites [21] Jakobsson, 2011, Regulation of synaptic vesicle budding and dynamin function by an EHD ATPase, J. Neurosci source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data
    § Results

    EHD1 is recruited to SE, where it interacts with SNX17 and facilitates fission of transport vesicles.

    “Overall, these data support the idea that EHD1 is recruited to SE, where it interacts with SNX17 and facilitates fission of transport vesicles.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Endosomal fission mediated by EHD1 may include additional proteins involved in membrane curvature, such as cPLA2α.

    “may include a variety of additional proteins involved in membrane curvature, such as cPLA2α”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] Cai, 2012, cPLA2α and EHD1 interact and regulate the vesiculation of cholesterol-rich, GPI-anchored, protein-containing endosomes, Mol. Biol. Cell source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    EHD1 is only one of several key mechanisms that regulate endosomal fission.

    “However, EHD1 is only one of several key mechanisms that regulate endosomal fission”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Discussion

    Upon LRP1 internalization, EHD1 is "activated" in the cytoplasm in a manner that might include ATP binding, dimerization, and/or phosphorylation and potentially other posttranslational modifications.

    “Upon LRP1 internalization, EHD1 is “activated” in the cytoplasm in a manner that might include ATP binding, dimerization, and/or phosphorylation and potentially other posttranslational modifications.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data
    § Discussion

    Because total SNX17 surface volume is only modestly increased upon LRP1 uptake, the increase in overlap with EHD1 comes primarily from a massive 3-fold recruitment of EHD1 to membrane surfaces upon LRP1 internalization.

    “Significantly, because total SNX17 surface volume is only modestly increased upon LRP1 uptake, the increase in overlap with EHD1 comes primarily from a massive 3-fold recruitment of EHD1 to membrane surfaces upon LRP1 internalization.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data
    § Results

    EHD1 is recruited to the SE membrane to catalyze fission and release transport vesicles to be targeted for recycling.

    “We postulate that SNX17 selects and sorts cargo into budding structures on SE and that EHD1 is recruited to the SE membrane to catalyze fission and release transport vesicles to be targeted for recycling.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Discussion

    Recruitment of EHD1 to endosomes by one or more EEIPs would explain why SNX17 knockdown did not affect recruitment.

    “Recruitment of EHD1 to endosomes by one or more of these EEIPs would explain why SNX17 knockdown did not affect recruitment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Discussion

    EHD1 dimers might then interact with an endosomal EHD1 interaction partner (EEIP) at the endosomal membrane.

    “The EHD1 dimers might then interact with an endosomal EHD1 interaction partner (EEIP) at the endosomal membrane.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Discussion

    All cell lines were routinely tested for Mycoplasma infection.

    “All cell lines were routinely tested for Mycoplasma infection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data
    § Discussion

    This study provides new insight into coupling of the endosomal sorting and fission machineries, highlighting a significant role of EHD1 in the endosomal fission process.

    “This study provides new insight into coupling of the endosomal sorting and fission machineries, highlighting a significant role of EHD1 in the endosomal fission process.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    EHD1 is a highly dynamic protein that cycles on and off of membranes, similar to many ATPases and GTPases.

    “EHD1 is a highly dynamic protein that cycles on and off of membranes, similar to many ATPases and GTPases”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Caplan, 2002, A tubular EHD1-containing compartment involved in the recycling of major histocompatibility complex class I molecules to the plasma membrane, EMBO J source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationown data
    § Results

    The weak approximately 50-kDa band is most likely a nonspecific band enriched during the IP.

    “the most likely explanation is that it is a nonspecific band that is enriched in the course of the IP.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Discussion

    Extensive washing of beads with 10 bed volumes of wash buffer removes nonspecifically bound proteins.

    “To ensure the removal of any nonspecifically bound proteins, the beads were then washed extensively with 10 bed volumes of wash buffer”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductcitation
    § Discussion

    Initial attempts to quantify colocalization by imaging in two or three dimensions followed by application of Pearson's or Manders' coefficients did not accurately reflect the degree of overlap observed, likely because of the significant degree of cytoplasmic EHD1 haze that interferes with the analysis.

    “did not accurately reflect the degree of overlap observed, likely because of the significant degree of cytoplasmic EHD1 haze that interferes with the analysis, especially in cells imaged without LRP1 internalization.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [49] McDonald, 2013, Statistical tests for measures of colocalization in biological microscopy, J. Microsc source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Proteins that interact with EHD1 without an NPF motif have been identified.

    “However, proteins that interact with EHD1 without an NPF motif have been identified”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [48] Shi, 2007, A novel requirement for C. elegans Alix/ALX-1 in RME-1-mediated membrane transport, Curr. Biol source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Discussion

    After recruitment, EHD1 might diffuse along the endosomal membrane, still bound to the EEIP via EH domain NPF motifs, until it comes into contact with and binds to SNX17 in an EH domain-independent mechanism, which is itself bound to a receptor cargo.

    “After recruitment, EHD1 might be able to diffuse along the endosomal membrane, still bound to the EEIP via EH domain NPF motifs, until it comes into contact with and binds to SNX17 (in an EH domain–independent mechanism), which is itself bound to a receptor cargo.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Results

    SNX17 selects and sorts cargo into budding structures on SE.

    “We postulate that SNX17 selects and sorts cargo into budding structures on SE and that EHD1 is recruited to the SE membrane to catalyze fission and release transport vesicles to be targeted for recycling.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    The process of endosomal fission mediated by EHD1 is highly complex.

    “The process of endosomal fission mediated by EHD1 is highly complex”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [17] Deo, 2018, ATP-dependent membrane remodeling links EHD1 functions to endocytic recycling, Nat. Commun source
    • cites [18] Kamerkar, 2019, A screen for membrane fission catalysts identifies the ATPase EHD1, Biochemistry source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Micrococcal nuclease treatment eliminates false positive interactions in protein-protein interaction assays.

    “as described by Nguyen and Goodrich (60”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nguyen and Goodrich (60

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Discussion

    More than 30 cells from three independent experiments were assessed using IMARIS.

    “more than 30 cells from three independent experiments were assessed using IMARIS.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    The WASH complex has been implicated in activation of the Arp2/3 actin polymerization nucleator at endosomes, a process thought to precede dynamin-controlled endosomal fission.

    “the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein and SCAR homolog (WASH) complex has been implicated in activation of the Arp2/3 actin polymerization nucleator at endosomes, a process thought to precede dynamin-controlled endosomal fission”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [59] Derivery, 2009, The Arp2/3 activator WASH controls the fission of endosomes through a large multiprotein complex, Dev. Cell source
31 of 31
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mechanisms by which SNX17-labeled vesicles that contain sorted receptors bud and undergo vesicular fission from sorting endosomes remain elusive.

    “However, the mechanisms by which SNX17-labeled vesicles that contain sorted receptors bud and undergo vesicular fission from the sorting endosomes remain elusive.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mechanism by which EHD1 is coupled to various receptors and regulates their recycling remains unknown.

    “However, the mechanism by which EHD1 is coupled to various receptors and regulates their recycling remains unknown.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Whether WASH complex–mediated actin nucleation is sufficient for fission at sorting endosomes remains unknown.

    “However, whether WASH complex–mediated actin nucleation is sufficient for fission at SE remains unknown”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Direct interactions between EHD1 and the cytoplasmic tails of receptors have not been identified.

    “However, to date, direct interactions between EHD1 and the cytoplasmic tails of receptors have not been identified.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mechanism of EHD1 recruitment and coupling to sorting endosomes has not been elucidated.

    “However, to date, the mechanism of EHD1 recruitment and coupling to SE has not been elucidated.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mechanisms of coupling SNX17 and its cargo receptors to specific fission machinery at the sorting endosome remain unknown.

    “However, the mechanisms of coupling SNX17 and its cargo receptors to specific fission machinery at the SE remain unknown.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    EHD1 appears to be recruited to sorting endosomes to facilitate fission of cargo in conjunction with SNX17-based cargo sorting.

    “because EHD1 appears to be recruited to SE to facilitate fission of cargo in conjunction with SNX17-based cargo sorting”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Antibody-induced internalization of LRP1 is a valid model of physiological LRP1 trafficking.

    “When incubated with an antibody to the SNX17-sorted cargo receptor low-density lipoprotein receptor–related protein 1 (LRP1)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    SNX17 siRNA knockdown does not alter EHD1 expression or other factors that affect EHD1 recruitment.

    “the same cells after SNX17 siRNA knockdown (decreased SNX17 expression validated and quantified in Fig. 5F)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    EHD1-GFP expressed at endogenous levels in CRISPR/Cas9-edited NIH3T3 cells behaves like wild-type EHD1.

    “we used mock (untreated) NIH3T3 CRISPR/Cas9 gene-edited EHD1-GFP cells”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    EHD1 knockout does not cause compensatory changes that affect SNX17-containing endosome size.

    “we again used CRISPR/Cas9 gene-edited NIH3T3 cells and initially compared the size of SNX17-containing endosomes in EHD1-GFP and EHD1 knockout cells”
11 of 11

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • SNX17 siRNA-treated cells are described as knockout cells

    Minor

    The experiment is described as an siRNA knockdown of SNX17, but the same cells are subsequently called SNX17 knockout cells. Knockdown and knockout are different conditions.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dhawan, K., Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Caplan, Steve
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
295
Issue
12
Pages
3837-3850
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3006483309
Cited by
36
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | National Institutes of Health (1R01GM123557, P20 GM103427)
  • Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (2019–41)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
Keywords
SNX17, EHD1, endosomal sorting, endosomal trafficking, receptor recycling, LRP1, dynamin-related proteins, sorting nexins
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Animals, Cell Membrane, HeLa Cells, Humans, Protein Binding, Endosomes, Recombinant Proteins, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-1, Vesicular Transport Proteins, RNA Interference, RNA, Small Interfering, NIH 3T3 Cells, Mice, Sorting Nexins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review