Cited by 289Occupational Health and BurnoutHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStress and Burnout Research

Predictors of Compassion Fatigue and Compassion Satisfaction in Acute Care Nurses

Kelly, Lesly, Runge, Jody, Spencer, Christina·2015·Journal of Nursing Scholarship

Abstract

Purpose To examine compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction in acute care nurses across multiple specialties in a hospital-based setting. Design A cross-sectional electronic survey design was used to collect data from direct care nurses in a 700-bed, quaternary care, teaching facility in the southwestern United States. Methods A total of 491 direct care registered nurses completed a survey measuring their professional quality of life (burnout, secondary traumatic stress, and compassion satisfaction). Analysis was conducted to assess for differences between demographics, specialties, job satisfaction, and intent to leave their current position. Findings Significant predictors of burnout included lack of meaningful recognition, nurses with more years of experience, and nurses in the "Millennial" generation (ages 21-33 years). Receiving meaningful recognition, higher job satisfaction, nurses in the "Baby Boomer" generation (ages 50-65 years), and nurses with fewer years of experience significantly predicted compassion satisfaction. No significant differences were noted across nurse specialties, units, or departments. Conclusions This study adds to the literature the impact meaningful recognition may have on compassion satisfaction and fatigue. Our findings provide a potential explanation for the lack of retention of nurses in the millennial generation who leave their positions with limited years of experience. Based on our research, meaningful recognition may increase comp…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jnu.12162

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelly, L., Runge, J., & Spencer, C.
Affiliations
  • Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix (US)
  • HonorHealth (US)
Corresponding author
Kelly, Lesly
Venue
Journal of Nursing Scholarship
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-08-19
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
522-528
ISSN
  • 0363-2792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-6546
  • 1547-5069
OpenAlex
W2116581847
Cited by
289
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
54.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Scholarship (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
compassion fatigue, compassion satisfaction, burnout, secondary traumatic stress, acute care nurses, meaningful recognition, job satisfaction, nurse retention, nurse turnover, nursing specialties, years of nursing experience, nursing workforce
MeSH terms
Compassion Fatigue, Workforce, Adult, Aged, Burnout, Professional, Critical Care, Cross-Sectional Studies, Empathy, Fatigue, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Middle Aged, Nurses, Personal Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Southwestern United States, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review