Cited by 18Patient Satisfaction in HealthcareNursing education and managementSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

Leveraging Technology to Sustain Extraordinary Care: A Qualitative Analysis of Meaningful Nurse Recognition

Clavelle, Joanne T., Sweeney, Cynthia D., Swartwout, Ellen, Lefton, Cindy, Guney, Senem·2019·JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Meaningful recognition of nurses submitted by patients and families using interactive patient care (IPC) technology was analyzed using artificial intelligence (AI) to identify the themes and behaviors associated with extraordinary nursing. BACKGROUND: Meaningful recognition positively impacts nursing and organizational outcomes. The use of AI techniques such as natural language processing and machine learning to identify and describe behaviors impacting patient experiences is an emerging science. METHODS: Nurse recognition comments were collected from a convenience sample of 3 organizations via an IPC inpatient platform and analyzed using the AI techniques of natural language processing, machine learning, sentiment analytics, and corollary dictionaries based on rules of linguistics. RESULTS: The top theme of nursing recognition comments was courtesy and respect with the behaviors of empathy/compassion, helpfulness, kindness, attentiveness, and emotional comfort. The theme of skills/knowledge was the 2nd most common, with the behaviors of being professional, knowledgeable, keeping track, competence, dedication, and being thorough. CONCLUSIONS: AI techniques for qualitative analysis of comments collected through IPC reveal nurse themes and behaviors most meaningful to patients and their family members. Nurses can advance the science of AI and guide its evolution so that nurse caring behaviors associated with establishing human connections that positively influence patient and family experience are accurately represented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nna.0000000000000757

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participants' enthusiasm about AI's capacity to facilitate early detection and intervention and relieve nurses from routine tasks mirrors earlier studies showing AI enhances clinical decision-making and optimizes workflow efficiency.

    “The fervor surrounding AI's capacity to facilitate early detection and intervention, coupled with its potential to relieve nurses from routine tasks, mirrors findings from earlier studies that accentuate AI's role in enhancing clinical decision-making and optimizing workflow efficiency [56,57].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clavelle, J. T., Sweeney, C. D., Swartwout, E., Lefton, C., & Guney, S.
Affiliations
DAISY Foundation (US)
Corresponding author
Clavelle, Joanne T.
Venue
JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration
Published
2019-06
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
303-309
ISSN
  • 0002-0443 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-0721
OpenAlex
W2945350763
Cited by
18
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Keywords
nurse recognition, empathy and compassion, sentiment analysis, natural language processing, patient experience, inpatient care
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Competence, Empathy, Humans, Nurse-Patient Relations, Nurses, Nursing Care, Professional-Family Relations, Technology, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review