Leveraging Technology to Sustain Extraordinary Care: A Qualitative Analysis of Meaningful Nurse Recognition
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Meaningful recognition of nurses submitted by patients and families using interactive patient care (IPC) technology was analyzed using artificial intelligence (AI) to identify the themes and behaviors associated with extraordinary nursing. BACKGROUND: Meaningful recognition positively impacts nursing and organizational outcomes. The use of AI techniques such as natural language processing and machine learning to identify and describe behaviors impacting patient experiences is an emerging science. METHODS: Nurse recognition comments were collected from a convenience sample of 3 organizations via an IPC inpatient platform and analyzed using the AI techniques of natural language processing, machine learning, sentiment analytics, and corollary dictionaries based on rules of linguistics. RESULTS: The top theme of nursing recognition comments was courtesy and respect with the behaviors of empathy/compassion, helpfulness, kindness, attentiveness, and emotional comfort. The theme of skills/knowledge was the 2nd most common, with the behaviors of being professional, knowledgeable, keeping track, competence, dedication, and being thorough. CONCLUSIONS: AI techniques for qualitative analysis of comments collected through IPC reveal nurse themes and behaviors most meaningful to patients and their family members. Nurses can advance the science of AI and guide its evolution so that nurse caring behaviors associated with establishing human connections that positively influence patient and family experience are accurately represented.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Participants' enthusiasm about AI's capacity to facilitate early detection and intervention and relieve nurses from routine tasks mirrors earlier studies showing AI enhances clinical decision-making and optimizes workflow efficiency.
“The fervor surrounding AI's capacity to facilitate early detection and intervention, coupled with its potential to relieve nurses from routine tasks, mirrors findings from earlier studies that accentuate AI's role in enhancing clinical decision-making and optimizing workflow efficiency [56,57].”
From Artificial intelligence in future nursing care: exploring perspectives of nursing professionals - a descriptive qualitative study (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Cites
Opinion mining and sentiment analysis
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1561/1500000011 · Cited by 6,372 · see citing works
Will artificial intelligence solve the human resource crisis in healthcare?
Meskó, B., Hetényi, G., & Győrffy, Z. (2018) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3359-4 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Predictors of Compassion Fatigue and Compassion Satisfaction in Acute Care Nurses
Kelly, L., Runge, J., & Spencer, C. (2015) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/jnu.12162 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Nursing staff teamwork and job satisfaction
Kalisch, B. J., Lee, H., & Rochman, M. F. (2010) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01153.x · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Ranard, B. L., Werner, R. M., Antanavicius, T., et al. (2016) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1030 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Work engagement in nursing: a concept analysis
Bargagliotti, L. A. (2011) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05859.x · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Intentionality and Caring-Healing Consciousness
Watson, J. (2002) · Holistic Nursing Practice · doi:10.1097/00004650-200207000-00005 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Positive Psychology in the Workplace
Froman, L. (2009) · Journal of Adult Development · doi:10.1007/s10804-009-9080-0 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Cowden, T. L., & Cummings, G. G. (2012) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05927.x · Cited by 107 · see citing works
McClelland, L. E., & Vogus, T. J. (2014) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12186 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Nurses' job satisfaction, stress, and recognition in a pediatric setting setting.
Ernst, M. E., Messmer, P. R., Franco, M. G., & Gonzalez, J. L. (2004) · PubMed · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Measuring the patient experience
Lees, C. (2011) · Nurse Researcher · doi:10.7748/nr2011.10.19.1.25.c8768 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Projects for Increasing Job Satisfaction and Creating a Healthy Work Environment
Brunges, M., & Foley‐Brinza, C. (2014) · AORN Journal · doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2014.01.029 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Strengthening the workforce through meaningful recognition.
Lefton, C. (2013) · PubMed · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationGrob, R., Schlesinger, M. J., Parker, A. M., Shaller, D., Barre, L. R., Martino, S. C., Finucane, M. L., Rybowski, L., & Cerully, J. (2016) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12503 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Reflective practices: meaningful recognition for healthy work environments
Sherwood, G. D., Cherian, U. K., Horton‐Deutsch, S., et al. (2018) · Nursing Management · doi:10.7748/nm.2018.e1684 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Impact of satisfactions with psychological reward and pay on Chinese nurses' work attitudes
Chen, F., Yang, M., Gao, W., Liu, Y., & Gieter, S. D. (2015) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2015.03.002 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Putting the “Meaning” in Meaningful Recognition of Nurses
Barnes, B., Barnes, M. R., & Sweeney, C. D. (2016) · JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration · doi:10.1097/nna.0000000000000394 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationBand 5 nurses’ perceptions and experiences of professional development
Wilkinson, S. J., & Hayward, R. A. (2017) · Nursing Management · doi:10.7748/nm.2017.e1537 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Application Scenarios for Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Care: Rapid Review
Seibert, K., Domhoff, D., Bruch, D., Schulte-Althoff, M., Fürstenau, D., Biessmann, F., & Wolf-Ostermann, K. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/26522 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Predicted Influences of Artificial Intelligence on the Domains of Nursing: Scoping Review
Buchanan, C., Howitt, M. L., Wilson, R., Booth, R. G., Risling, T., & Bamford, M. (2020) · JMIR Nursing · doi:10.2196/23939 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Rony, M. K. K., Kayesh, I., Bala, S. D., Akter, F., & Parvin, M. R. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25718 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Hwang, G.-J., Tang, K.-Y., & Tu, Y.-F. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2086579 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
A Concept Analysis on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Nursing
Shang, Z. (2021) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.14857 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
- Authors
- Clavelle, J. T., Sweeney, C. D., Swartwout, E., Lefton, C., & Guney, S.
- Affiliations
- DAISY Foundation (US)
- Corresponding author
- Clavelle, Joanne T.
- Venue
- JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 303-309
- ISSN
- 0002-0443 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0721
- OpenAlex
- W2945350763
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- nurse recognition, empathy and compassion, sentiment analysis, natural language processing, patient experience, inpatient care
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Competence, Empathy, Humans, Nurse-Patient Relations, Nurses, Nursing Care, Professional-Family Relations, Technology, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review