Cited by 28Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery TechniquesDermatologic Treatments and ResearchFacial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research

Clinical efficacy and safety of polynucleotides highly purified technology (PN‐HPT®) and cross‐linked hyaluronic acid for moderate to severe nasolabial folds: A prospective, randomized, exploratory study

Open access
Araco, Antonino, Araco, Francesco, Raichi, Mauro·2023·Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology

Abstract

Introduction: The mandibular profile undergoes progressive wasting with aging, and the deepening of nasolabial folds (NLFs) has a leading role. Hyaluronic acid (HA) efficiently controls tissue hydration and permeability to small and large molecules. NLFs are an acknowledged HA target; at the same time, another class of agents, PN‐HPT® (Polynucleotides Highly Purified Technology), enjoy growing acknowledgement in aesthetic medicine. This exploratory, prospective study probed the rationale of sequentially associating PN‐HPT® as a first priming agent acting in the skin followed by HA dermal filler injections for correcting moderate to severe NLFs. Methods: Following strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, the authors screened Caucasian ambulatory women aged 40–65 with moderate to severe NLFs and randomly selected two NLFs for each enrolled woman. Due to the purely explorative nature of the study, the authors initially planned to enroll no >10 women. According to a split‐face design, the selected right‐side NLFs received 4 ml of PN‐HPT® intradermally in the initial priming phase (“NLF Rx group”); the selected left‐side NLFs received 4 ml of saline (placebo) (“NLF Lx group”). After 3 and 6 weeks, all patients received 2 ml of subdermal cross‐linked HA over both NLF areas (4 ml overall). The total study follow‐up was 6 months after the first injection, with objective assessments, based on the qualitative and quantitative Antera 3D® and Vectra H2® skin imaging technologies, after 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months. Results: Because of the favorable early outcomes, the authors let enrollment progress between January and June 2020 up to a total of 20 women and 40 NLFs. All treated women completed the six‐month follow‐up without reporting side effects, even clinically minor. The Antera 3D® device demonstrated that wrinkles and skin texture significantly improved in the NLF Rx after 6 weeks (monotherapy phase) and 3 and 6 months (PN‐HPT® priming + HA phase) compared with baseline. HA levels, measured with the quantitative Vectra H2® assessment technology in the right NLFs, were significantly higher than contralaterally at both 3 and 6 months. Conclusions: Although conceived only as an exploratory investigation, the study confirmed that PN‐HPT® monotherapy might be a valuable and effective option to rapidly improve the skin dermis texture and quality in individuals with moderate to severe NLFs. Acting as a priming agent in the skin, PN‐HPT® prolong the clinical efficacy of cross‐linked HA. Well‐designed trials in larger treatment groups will hopefully confirm these early promising results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jocd.15064

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Additional improvements were observed in skin surface evenness, including reduction in pores, wrinkles, and acne scars.

    “Additional improvements were observed in skin surface evenness, including reduction in pores, wrinkles, and acne scars [168,169].”

    From Comparison of Polynucleotide and Polydeoxyribonucleotide in Dermatology: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [168]

    The Results (page unavailable) report improved wrinkles and skin texture in treated nasolabial folds, supporting the wrinkles and surface-evenness portions of the claim. The paper does not report a reduction in pores or measure acne-scar improvement in this study; its Discussion mentions acne-scar results from an earlier study. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The commercialization of Placentex® in the early 1990s marked a significant milestone in the therapeutic use of PDRN.

    “The commercialization of Placentex® in the early 1990s marked a significant milestone in the therapeutic use of PDRN”

    From Comparison of Polynucleotide and Polydeoxyribonucleotide in Dermatology: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [168]

    The Discussion distinguishes PDRN from PN‐HPT® and describes a current therapeutic indication for PDRN, but does not mention Placentex® or its commercialization. Searches for Placentex®, commercialization, and the early 1990s found no passage addressing the claimed milestone; no page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The commercialization of Placentex® catalyzed advancements in DNA purification technologies.

    “and catalyzed advancements in DNA purification technologies [147,148,168].”

    From Comparison of Polynucleotide and Polydeoxyribonucleotide in Dermatology: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [168]

    The Discussion distinguishes PN-HPT® from PDRN and describes their clinical uses, but does not mention Placentex® or a history of DNA purification. Searches for Placentex® commercialization and advances in DNA purification found no passage addressing the claimed causal link. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. [1]Guida S, Pellacani G, Ciardo S, Longo C. Reflectance confocal microscopy of aging skin and skin cancer. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2021; 11: e2021068. 34123564 PMC8172052
  2. [2]Guida S, Ciardo S, De Pace B, et al. Atrophic and hypertrophic skin photoaging and melanocortin‐1 receptor (MC1R): the missing link. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021; 84: 187‐ 190. 32335180
  3. [3]Guida S, Ciardo S, De Pace B, et al. The influence of MC1R on dermal morphological features of photo‐exposed skin in women revealed by reflectance confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography. Exp Dermatol. 2019; 28: 1321‐ 1327. 31520496
  4. [4]Gierloff M, Stohring C, Buder T, et al. Aging changes of the midfacial fat compartments: a computed tomographic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129: 263‐ 273. 21915077
  5. [5]Le Louarn C, Buthiau D, Buis J. Structural aging: the facial recurve concept. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2007; 31: 213‐ 218. 17380358
  6. [6]Beasley KL, Weiss MA, Weiss RA. Hyaluronic acid fillers: a comprehensive review. Facial Plast Surg. 2009; 25: 86‐ 94. 19415575
  7. [7]Dicker KT, Gurski LA, Pradhan‐Bhatt S, Witt RL, Farach‐Carson MC, Jia X. Hyaluronan: a simple polysaccharide with diverse biological functions. Acta Biomater. 2014; 10: 1558‐ 1570. 24361428 PMC3960342
  8. [8]Vigetti D, Karousou E, Viola M, Deleonibus S, de Luca G, Passi A. Hyaluronan: biosynthesis and signaling. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014; 1840: 2452‐ 2459. 24513306
  9. [9]Galimberti MG, Guida S, Pellacani G, Bencini PL. Hyaluronic acid filler for skin rejuvenation: the role of diet on outcomes. A pilot study. Dermatol Ther. 2018; 31: e12646. 30019474
  10. [10]Hiramoto K, Kobayashi H, Yamate Y, Ishii M, Sato EF. Intercellular pathway through hyaluronic acid in UVB‐induced inflammation. Exp Dermatol. 2012; 21: 911‐ 914. 23171450
  11. [11]Cavallini M, Papagni M. Long‐chain polynucleotides gel and skin biorevitalization. J Plastic Dermatol. 2007; 3: 27‐ 32.
  12. [12]Matera G, Dodici N, Raichi M. Improving on laser: biorevitalization of stretch marks, the polynucleotides infiltrations combined with CO2 laser option. Aesthetic Med. 2020; 6: 19‐ 26.
  13. [13]Cavallini M, Bartoletti E. Members of the polynucleotides HPT® priming board, Italian College of the Aesthetic Medicine Scientific Societies (SIME, AGORÀ, SIES). Consensus report on the use of PN‐HPT® (polynucleotide highly purified technology) in aesthetic medicine. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021; 20: 922‐ 928. 32799391 PMC7984045
  14. [14]De Caridi G, Massara M, Acri I, et al. Trophic effects of polynucleotides and hyaluronic acid in the healing of venous ulcers of the lower limbs: a clinical study. Int Wound J. 2016; 13: 754‐ 758. 25224018 PMC7949893
  15. [15]Palmieri IP, Raichi M. Biorevitalization of postmenopausal labia majora, the polynucleotide/hyaluronic acid option. Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2019; 3: 2‐ 5.
  16. [16]Giarratana LS, Marelli BM. A randomized, double‐blind clinical trial on the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: the efficacy of polynucleotides compared to standard hyaluronan viscosupplementation. Knee. 2014; 21: 661‐ 668. 24703391
  17. [17]Jiechen Z, H W. Classification of facial wrinkles among Chinese women. J Biomed Res. 2017; 31: 108‐ 115. 28808192 PMC5445213
  18. [18]Guida S, Pellacani G, Bencini PL. Picosecond laser treatment of atrophic and hypertrophic surgical scars: in vivo monitoring of results by means of 3D imaging and reflectance confocal microscopy. Skin Res Technol. 2019; 25: 896‐ 902. 31338926
  19. [19]Jang SI, Kim EJ, Park H, et al. A quantitative evaluation method using processed optical images and analysis of age‐dependent changes on nasolabial lines. Skin Res Technol. 2015; 21: 201‐ 206. 25130375
  20. [20]Tanizaki H, Tanioka M, Yamashita Y, Hayashi N. Quantitative evaluation of atrophic acne scars using 3D image analysis with reflected LED light. Skin Res Technol. 2020; 26: 20‐ 24. 31478266
  21. [21]Araco A, Araco F. Preliminary prospective and randomized study of highly purified polynucleotide versus placebo in treatment of moderate to severe acne scars. Aesthet Surg J. 2021; 41: NP866‐ NP874. 33755110
  22. [23]Ezure T, Amano S. Involvement of upper cheek sagging in nasolabial fold formation. Skin Res Technol. 2012; 18: 259‐ 264. 22092417
  23. [24]Papakonstantinou E, Roth M, Karakiulakis G. Hyaluronic acid: a key molecule in skin aging. Dermato‐Endocrinol. 2012; 4: 253‐ 258. PMC3583886 23467280
  24. [25]Ascher B, Bayerl C, Brun P, et al. Efficacy and safety of a new hyaluronic acid dermal filler in the treatment of severe nasolabial lines—6‐month interim results of a randomized, evaluator‐blinded, intra‐individual comparison study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2011; 10: 94‐ 98. 21649813
  25. [26]Croce MA, Dyne K, Boraldi F, et al. Hyaluronan affects protein and collagen synthesis by in vitro human skin fibroblasts. Tissue Cell. 2001; 33: 326‐ 331. 11521947
  26. [27]La Gatta A, Schiraldi C, Papa A, De Rosa M. Comparative analysis of commercial dermal fillers based on cross‐linked hyaluronan: physical characterization and in vitro enzymatic degradation. Polym Degrad Stab. 2011; 96: 630‐ 636.
  27. [28]De Backer D, Hollenberg S, et al. How to evaluate the microcirculation: report of a round table conference. Crit Care. 2007; 11: R101. 17845716 PMC2556744
  28. [30]Polito F, Bitto A, Galeano M, et al. Polydeoxyribonucleotide restores blood flow in an experimental model of ischemic skin flaps. J Vasc Surg. 2012; 55: 479‐ 488. 22051873
  29. [31]Massirone A. Polynucleotides highly purified technology and the face skin, a story of innovative skin priming. Aesth Med. 2021; 7: 35‐ 40.
  30. [32]Bartoletti E, Cavallini M, Maioli L, et al. Introduction to polynucleotides highly purified technology. Aesth Med. 2020; 6: 43‐ 47.
  31. [33]Brandi C, Cuomo R, Nisi G, Grimaldi L, D'Aniello C. Face rejuvenation: a new combined protocol for biorevitalization. Acta Biomed. 2018; 89: 400‐ 405. 30333466 PMC6502127
  32. [34]Zhang J, Hou W, Feng S, Chen X, Wang H. Classification of facial wrinkles among Chinese women. J Biomed Res. 2017; 31: 108‐ 115. 28808192 PMC5445213

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Araco, A., Araco, F., & Raichi, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
  • Cosmetic and Plastic Surgeon San Giovanni Evangelista Hospital Tivoli Italy
  • Clinical Pharmacology Consultant in Aesthetic Medicine Milan Italy
Corresponding author
Araco, Antonino
Venue
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-05-26
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
146-155
ISSN
  • 1473-2130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-2165
OpenAlex
W4229454470
Cited by
28
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
Keywords
nasolabial fold, cross-linked hyaluronic acid, dermal fillers, facial aging, skin hydration, skin texture, wrinkle reduction, aesthetic medicine, treatment safety, treatment efficacy, Vectra
MeSH terms
Dermal Fillers, Cosmetic Techniques, Female, Humans, Hyaluronic Acid, Prospective Studies, Skin Aging, Treatment Outcome, Nasolabial Fold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review