Cited by 29Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationClinical practice guidelines implementation

How actionable are staff behaviours specified in policy documents? A document analysis of protocols for managing deteriorating patients

Open access
Smith, Duncan, Sekhon, Mandeep, Francis, Jill J., Aitken, Leanne M.·2019·Journal of Clinical Nursing

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To optimise care of deteriorating patients, healthcare organisations have implemented rapid response systems including an "afferent" and "efferent" limb. Afferent limb behaviours include monitoring vital signs and escalating care. To strengthen afferent limb behaviour and reduce adverse patient outcomes, the National Early Warning Score was implemented in the UK. There are no published reports of how National Early Warning Score guidance has translated into trust-level deteriorating patient policy and whether these documents provide clear, actionable statements guiding staff. AIM: To identify how deteriorating patient policy documents provide "actionable" behavioural instruction for staff, responsible for actioning the afferent limb of the rapid response system. DESIGN: A structured content analysis of a national guideline and local policies using a behaviour specification framework. METHODS: Local deteriorating patient policies were obtained. Statements of behaviour were extracted from policies; coded using a behaviour specification framework: Target, Action, Context, Timing and Actor and scored for specificity (1 = present, nonspecific; 2 = present, specific). Frequencies and proportions of statements containing elements of the Target, Action, Context, Timing and Actor framework were summarised descriptively. Reporting was guided by the COREQ checklist. RESULTS: There were more statements related to monitoring than escalation behaviour (65% vs 35%). Despite high levels of clear specification of the action (94%) and the target of the behaviour (74%), context, timing and actor were poorly specified (37%, 37% and 33%). CONCLUSION: Delay in escalating deteriorating patients is associated with adverse outcomes. Some delay could be addressed by writing local protocols with greater behavioural specificity, to facilitate actionability. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Numerous clinical staff are required for an effective response to patient deterioration. To mitigate role confusion, local policy writers should provide clear specification of the actor. As the behaviours are time-sensitive, clear specification of the time frame may increase actionability of policy statements for clinical staff.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jocn.15005

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Smith, D. J., & Aitken, L. M. (2016). Use of a single parameter track and trigger chart and the perceived barriers and facilitators to escalation of a deteriorating ward patient: A mixed methods study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25(1-2). https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13104 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, D., Sekhon, M., Francis, J. J., & Aitken, L. M.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Smith, Duncan
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-08-07
Volume
28
Issue
21-22
Pages
4139-4149
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W2963649144
Cited by
29
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Kingston University London) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
City, University of London
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
clinical deterioration, rapid response system, National Early Warning Score, afferent limb, vital signs monitoring, treatment escalation, identity diffusion
MeSH terms
Clinical Deterioration, Humans, Time Factors, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Vital Signs, Hospital Rapid Response Team, Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review