Cited by 484Health Policy Implementation ScienceBehavioral Health and InterventionsHealth Sciences Research and Education

Theories of behaviour change synthesised into a set of theoretical groupings: introducing a thematic series on the theoretical domains framework

Open access
Francis, Jill J, O’Connor, Denise, Curran, Janet·2012·Implementation Science

Abstract

Behaviour change is key to increasing the uptake of evidence into healthcare practice. Designing behaviour-change interventions first requires problem analysis, ideally informed by theory. Yet the large number of partly overlapping theories of behaviour makes it difficult to select the most appropriate theory. The need for an overarching theoretical framework of behaviour change was addressed in research in which 128 explanatory constructs from 33 theories of behaviour were identified and grouped. The resulting Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) appears to be a helpful basis for investigating implementation problems. Research groups in several countries have conducted TDF-based studies. It seems timely to bring together the experience of these teams in a thematic series to demonstrate further applications and to report key developments. This overview article describes the TDF, provides a brief critique of the framework, and introduces this thematic series.In a brief review to assess the extent of TDF-based research, we identified 133 papers that cite the framework. Of these, 17 used the TDF as the basis for empirical studies to explore health professionals' behaviour. The identified papers provide evidence of the impact of the TDF on implementation research. Two major strengths of the framework are its theoretical coverage and its capacity to elicit beliefs that could signify key mediators of behaviour change. The TDF provides a useful conceptual basis for assessing implementation problems, designing interventions to enhance healthcare practice, and understanding behaviour-change processes. We discuss limitations and research challenges and introduce papers in this series.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1748-5908-7-35

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Helms C Leask J Robbins SC Chow MYK McIntyre P Implementation of mandatory immunisation of healthcare workers: observations from New South Wales, Australia Vaccine 2011 29 16 2895 2901 21338677
  2. Cuthbertson BH Francis J Campbell MK MacIntyre L Seppelt I Grimshaw J A study of the perceived risks, benefits and barriers to the use of SDD in adult critical care units (The SuDDICU study) Trials 2010 11 117 21129208 PMC3017022
  3. McKenzie JE O’Connor DA Page MJ Mortimer DS French SD Walker BF Keating JL Grimshaw JM Michie S Francis JJ Green SE Improving the care for people with acute low-back pain by allied health professionals (the ALIGN trial): a cluster randomised trial protocol Implementation Science 2010 5 86 21067614 PMC2994785
  4. Hetrick S Álvarez-Jiménez M Parker A Hughes F Willet M Morley K Fraser R McGorry PD Thompson A Promoting physical health in youth mental health services: ensuring routine monitoring of weight and metabolic indices in a first episode psychosis clinic Australas Psychiatry 2010 18 5 451 455 20863186
  5. McCluskey A Middleton S Delivering an evidence-based outdoor journey intervention to people with stroke: Barriers and enablers experienced by community rehabilitation teams BMC Health Services Research 2010 10 18 20082725 PMC2821384
  6. Pitt VJ O’Connor D Green S Referral of people with osteoarthritis to self-management programmes: barriers and enablers identified by general practitioners Disabil Rehabil 2008 30 25 1938 1946 18608407
  7. Brotherton JML Leask J Jackson C McCaffery K Trevena LJ National survey of general practitioners experience of delivering the national human papillomavirus vaccination program Sex Heal 2010 7 3 291 298 20719217
  8. Clarkson JE Ramsay CR Eccles MP Eldridge S Eldridge S Grimshaw JM Johnston M Michie S Treweek S Walker A Young L Black I Bonetti D Cassie H Francis J MacKenzie G MacPherson L McKee L Pitts N Rennie J Stirling D Tilley C Torgerson C Vale L The translation research in a dental setting (TRiaDS) programme protocol Implementation Science 2010 5 57 20646275 PMC2920875
  9. Edwards P Felix L Harris J Ferguson E Free C Landon J Lock K Michie S Miners A Murray E Assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of adaptive e-Learning to improve dietary behaviour: Protocol for a systematic review BMC Public Health 2010 10 200 20409308 PMC2868000
  10. Guillaumie L Godin G Vézina-Im L Psychosocial determinants of fruit and vegetable intake in adult population: a systematic review Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ 2010 7 12 PMC2831029 20181070
  11. Zhu DQ Norman IJ While AE The relationship between doctors’ and nurses’ own weight status and their weight management practices: a systematic review Obes Rev 2011 12 6 459 469 21366835
  12. Jacobs N De Bourdeaudhuij I Thijs H Dendale P Claes N Effect of a cardiovascular prevention program on health behavior and BMI in highly educated adults: a randomized controlled trial Patient Educ Couns 2011 85 1 122 126 20888728
  13. Judah G Aunger R Schmidt W Michie S Granger S Curtis V Experimental pretesting of hand-washing interventions in a natural setting Am J Public Health 2009 99 SUPPL. 2 S405 S411 19797755 PMC4504379
  14. Ivers NM Tu K Francis J Barnsley J Shah B Upshur R Kiss A Grimshaw JM Zwarenstein M Feedback GAP: Study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial of goal setting and action plans to increase the effectiveness of audit and feedback interventions in primary care Implementation Science 2010 5 98 21167034 PMC3161381
  15. Stevens G Bias in attributions of positive and negative behavior in children by school psychologists, parents, and teachers Percept Mot Ski 1980 50 3 1283 1290 7413400
  16. Rogers EM Diffusion of Innovations 1962 Free Press, Glencoe
  17. Kitson AL Rycroft-Malone J Harvey G McCormack B Seers K Titchen A Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges Implementation Science 2008 3 1 18179688 PMC2235887

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Francis, J. J., O’Connor, D., & Curran, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Francis, Jill J
Venue
Implementation Science
Published
2012-04-24
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
35-35
ISSN
1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103125760
Cited by
484
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
43.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • uO Research (University of Ottawa) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
  • Scottish Government
  • Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (606726)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
Theoretical Domains Framework, behaviour change theory, implementation research, implementation problems, behaviour change interventions
MeSH terms
Diffusion of Innovation, Health Services Research, Humans, Models, Psychological, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Health Behavior, Guideline Adherence, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review