The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychological impact of COVID‐19 outbreak on frontline nurses: A cross‐sectional survey study
Open accessAbstract
Aims and objectives: This study aimed to portray the prevalence and associated factors of psychological distress among frontline nurses during COVID‐19 outbreak. Background: The COVID‐19 outbreak has posed great threat to public health worldwide. Nurses fighting against the epidemic on the frontline might be under great physical and psychological distress. This psychological distress was predominantly described as sleep disturbance, symptoms of anxiety and depression, post‐traumatic stress, inability to make decisions and even somatic symptoms. Design: Cross‐sectional study. Methods: Frontline nurses from designated hospitals for COVID‐19 patients were invited to complete an online survey by convenience sampling, and the survey included six main sections: the General Health Questionnaire, the Perceived Social Support Scale, the Simplified Coping Style Scale, the Impact of Event Scale‐Revised, socio‐demographic, occupation and work history. Multiple logistic analysis was used to identify the potential risk factors of psychological distress. The study methods were compliant with the STROBE checklist. Results: Of the 263 frontline nurses, 66 (25.1%) were identified as psychological distress. Multiple logistic analysis revealed that working in emergency department, concern for family, being treated differently, negative coping style and COVID‐19‐related stress symptom were positive related to psychological distress. Perceived more social support and effective precautionary measures were negatively associated with psychological distress. Conclusions: The study demonstrated that COVID‐19 had a significant psychological impact on frontline nurses. Early detection of psychological distress and supportive intervention should be taken according to the associated factors to prevent more serious psychological impact on frontline nurses. Relevance to clinical practice: This study highlighted that the frontline nurses were suffering from varying degrees of psychological distress, which needed early screening and supportive intervention for preventing more serious psychological impact on frontline nurses. Beside, more specific measurement should be combined with the GHQ‐12 to assess the varying degrees of psychological distress in frontline nurses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2 · Cited by 13,339
(1988) · NFER-Nelson eBooks · Cited by 5,560
Psychometric Characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
Zimet, G. D., Powell, S. S., Farley, G. K., Werkman, S., & Berkoff, K. A. (1990) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.1990.9674095 · Cited by 4,855
The Validity of Two Versions of the GHQ in the WHO Study of Mental Illness in General Health Care
GOLDBERG, D. P., GATER, R., SARTORIUS, N., USTUN, T. B., PICCINELLI, M., GUREJE, O., & RUTTER, C. (1997) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291796004242 · Cited by 3,657
Transmission routes of 2019-nCoV and controls in dental practice
Peng, X., Xu, X., Li, Y., Cheng, L., Zhou, X., & Ren, B. (2020) · International Journal of Oral Science · doi:10.1038/s41368-020-0075-9 · Cited by 2,437
Prevalence of mental disorders in China: a cross-sectional epidemiological study
Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, H., Liu, Z., Yu, X., Yan, J., Yu, Y., Kou, C., Xu, X., Lu, J., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30511-x · Cited by 2,335
SARS control and psychological effects of quarantine, Toronto, Canada
Hawryluck, L., Gold, W. L., Robinson, S., Pogorski, S., Galea, S., & Styra, R. (2004) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1007.030703 · Cited by 1,929
Wu, P., Fang, Y., Guan, Z., Fan, B., Kong, J., Yao, Z., Liu, X., Fuller, C. J., Susser, E., Lu, J., et al. (2009) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674370905400504 · Cited by 1,647
Maunder, R., Hunter, J., Vincent, L. H., Bennett, J. P., Peladeau, N., Leszcz, M., Sadavoy, J., Verhaeghe, L. M., Steinberg, R. J., & Mazzulli, T. (2003) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 1,495
Psychosocial effects of SARS on hospital staff: survey of a large tertiary care institution
Nickell, L. A. (2004) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.1031077 · Cited by 711
Cited by
Al Maqbali, M., Al Sinani, M., & Al-Lenjawi, B. (2021) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110343 · Cited by 501
Yuan, K., Gong, Y.-M., Liu, L., Sun, Y.-K., Tian, S.-S., Wang, Y.-J., Zhong, Y., Zhang, A.-Y., Su, S.-Z., Liu, X.-X., et al. (2021) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-021-01036-x · Cited by 300
Chang, M.-C., Chen, P.-F., Lee, T.-H., Lin, C.-C., Chiang, K.-T., Tsai, M.-F., Kuo, H.-F., & Lung, F.-W. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.628894 · Cited by 53
Resilience room use and its effect on distress among nurses and allied staff
Prendergast, V., Elmasry, S., Juhl, N. A., & Chapple, K. M. (2023) · Journal of Neuroscience Nursing · doi:10.1097/jnn.0000000000000701 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Nie, A., Su, X., Zhang, S., Guan, W., & Li, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-08-25
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 21-22
- Pages
- 4217-4226
- ISSN
- 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2702
- OpenAlex
- W3048910704
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 21.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological impact of COVID‐19 outbreak on frontline nurses: A cross‐sectional survey study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jocn.15454
- The paper
- Nie, A., Su, X., Zhang, S., Guan, W., & Li, J. (2020). Psychological impact of COVID‐19 outbreak on frontline nurses: A cross‐sectional survey study. Journal of Clinical Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15454
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.