Cited by 24Electronic Health Records SystemsPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsNursing education and management

Implementation of distributed automated medication dispensing units in a new hospital: Nursing and pharmacy experience

Craswell, Alison, Bennett, Kate, Hanson, Julie, Dalgliesh, Brett, Wallis, Marianne·2021·Journal of Clinical Nursing

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the structures, processes and outcomes involved in an Automated Medication Dispensing system implementation and its impact on patient safety. BACKGROUND: Increasing digitalisation of medication prescribing, dispensing, administration and stock management has occurred over the past two decades. While automated medication dispensing units aim to provide safe, high-quality, patient-centred care, the implementation may result in unintended consequences leading to suboptimal outcomes. DESIGN: This study uses a qualitative approach guided by Donabedian's structure, process and outcome framework. METHODS: Twenty-six registered nurses and pharmacy assistant staff, from clinical areas equipped with automated medication dispensing cabinets, participated in semi-structured interviews. In-depth, thematic analysis explored the structures and processes. Together with interview data, content analysis of text data generated by internal risk management and critical incident reporting systems was undertaken to evaluate outcomes. Findings were considered in light of the Interactive Sociotechnical Analysis approach to health information technology. The COREQ checklist was used in preparation of this article. RESULTS: Pharmacy assistants reported better satisfaction with the system at implementation than nurses. Training provided for nurses and their involvement in system implementation was reported as insufficient; however, nurses' use of and satisfaction with the system improved over time. A recursive relationship between the changes imposed by the system and nurses' creative problem solving (workarounds) used to manage these changes, impacted work productivity for nurses and safety for patients. CONCLUSIONS: The individualised nature of "workarounds" employed offered both risks and opportunities which require further identification, investigation and management. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses are the majority of the health workforce. Digitalisation of traditionally paper-based activities in health care, impacting nursing work, requires similar strategies to any practice change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jocn.15793

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craswell, A., Bennett, K., Hanson, J., Dalgliesh, B., & Wallis, M.
Affiliations
  • University of the Sunshine Coast (AU)
  • Sunshine Coast University Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Craswell, Alison
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-04-30
Volume
30
Issue
19-20
Pages
2863-2872
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W3159685927
Cited by
24
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
automated dispensing, health information technology implementation, patient safety, nurses' satisfaction, nursing workload, pharmacy assistants, Donabedian structure-process-outcome framework, socio-technical analysis, employee training, hospital pharmacy
MeSH terms
Pharmaceutical Preparations, Hospitals, Humans, Pharmacy, Pharmacy Service, Hospital, Drug Prescriptions, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review