Cited by 8Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthGlobal Maternal and Child HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

Care and management of stillborn babies from the parents’ perspective: A phenomenological study

Sun, Jui‐Chiung, Rei, Wenmay, Chang, Min‐Yu, Sheu, Shuh‐Jen·2022·Journal of Clinical Nursing

Abstract

Aim To explore parents' perspective on hospital's care and management of the remains of stillborn babies. Background Each year, 2.6 million of pregnancies end as stillbirth. Recent literature began to understand parents' traumatic experience in stillbirth and its profound impact on parents' mental health and psychosocial effect. But there is limited understanding on the actual care and management of the stillborn baby, nor is there an agreement on how hospitals should care for the stillborn baby to mitigate parents' profound loss. Design A descriptive phenomenological approach was applied to conduct this study. Methods A purposive sample of twenty couples (40 individuals) who had encountered how to care for the remains of their stillborn babies participated in the study. The data were collected through in-depth interviews, which involved semi-structured and open-ended questions. The phenomenological methods of Giorgi were applied to analyse the data. The COREQ checklist was used preparing the manuscript. Results Parents felt unprepared and lack of support when they had to handle their stillborn babies' remains. The research results revealed two major themes: (1) Handling stillborn babies remain ignorantly; (2) Pacifying the disturbed soul on both sides. Conclusions It was found in the study that reflection and identification were the emerging themes, which can enable healthcare professionals to understand parents' concerns in a meaningful way, as they deal with the remains of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jocn.15936

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, J., Rei, W., Chang, M., & Sheu, S.
Affiliations
  • Chang Gung University of Science and Technology (TW)
  • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
  • Asia Eastern University of Science and Technology (TW)
Corresponding author
Sheu, Shuh‐Jen
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-07-06
Volume
31
Issue
7-8
Pages
860-868
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W3181127366
Cited by
8
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
stillbirth, parents' perspective, grief and loss, parental support
MeSH terms
Emotions, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Infant, Parents, Pregnancy, Stillbirth, Hope

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review