The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exit as Governance: An Empirical Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Recent theory posits a new governance channel available to blockholders: threat of exit. Threat of exit, as opposed to actual exit, is difficult to measure directly. However, a crucial property is that it is weaker when stock liquidity is lower and vice versa. We use natural experiments of financial crises and decimalization as exogenous shocks to stock liquidity. Firms with larger blockholdings experience greater declines (increases) in firm value during the crises (decimalization), particularly if the manager's wealth is sensitive to the stock price and thus to exit threats. Additional tests suggest exit threats are distinct from blockholder intervention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches
Petersen, M. A. (2009) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn053 · Cited by 10,746
Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects
Amihud, Y. (2002) · Journal of Financial Markets · doi:10.1016/s1386-4181(01)00024-6 · Cited by 9,963
Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading
Kyle, A. S. (1985) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913210 · Cited by 9,580
Large Shareholders and Corporate Control
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261385 · Cited by 8,408
Management ownership and market valuation
Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(88)90048-7 · Cited by 6,895
The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences
Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261354 · Cited by 6,236
On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets
Stiglitz, J. E., & Grossman, S. J. (1980) · Columbia University · doi:10.7916/d8765r99 · Cited by 3,645
Formal and Real Authority in Organizations
Aghion, P., & Tirole, J. (1997) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/262063 · Cited by 3,046
What Matters in Corporate Governance?
Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. (2009) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn099 · Cited by 2,906
Asset pricing with liquidity risk
ACHARYA, V, & PEDERSEN, L. (2005) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.06.007 · Cited by 2,773
Cited by
Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?
FANG, V. W., TIAN, X., & TICE, S. (2014) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12187 · Cited by 1,339
Stock Liquidity and Stock Price Crash Risk
Chang, X., Chen, Y., & Zolotoy, L. (2017) · Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis · doi:10.1017/s0022109017000473 · Cited by 486
Agency Conflicts and Cash: Estimates from a Dynamic Model
NIKOLOV, B., & WHITED, T. M. (2014) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12183 · Cited by 363
Institutional investor cliques and governance
Crane, A. D., Koch, A., & Michenaud, S. (2019) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.11.012 · Cited by 214
Metadata
- Authors
- BHARATH, S. T., JAYARAMAN, S., & NAGAR, V.
- Venue
- The Journal of Finance
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-11-12
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2515-2547
- ISSN
- 0022-1082 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6261
- OpenAlex
- W2316509495
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 88.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exit as Governance: An Empirical Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jofi.12073
- The paper
- BHARATH, S. T., JAYARAMAN, S., & NAGAR, V. (2013). Exit as Governance: An Empirical Analysis. The Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12073
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.